Literature DB >> 15046783

Multi-species assessment of electrical resistance as a skin integrity marker for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies.

D J Davies1, R J Ward, J R Heylings.   

Abstract

Assessment of percutaneous absorption in vitro provides key information when predicting dermal absorption in vivo. Confirmation of skin membrane integrity is an essential component of the in vitro method, as described in test guideline OECD 428. Historically, assessment of the membrane's permeability to tritiated water (T2O) and the generation of a permeability coefficient (Kp) were used to confirm that the skin membrane was intact prior to application of the test penetrant. Measuring electrical resistance (ER) across the membrane is a simpler, quicker, safer and more cost effective method. To investigate the robustness of the ER integrity measure, the Kp values for T2O for a range of human and animal skin membranes were compared with corresponding ER data. Overall, for human, rat, pig, mouse, rabbit and guinea pig skin, the ER data gave a good inverse association with the corresponding Kp values; the higher the Kp the lower the ER values. In addition, the distribution across a large dataset for individual skin samples was similar for Kp and ER, allowing a cut-off value for ER to be established for each skin type. Based on CTL's (Syngenta Central Toxicology Laboratory) standard static diffusion cells and databridge, we propose that intact skin should have an ER equal to or above (in kOmega): human (10), mouse (5) guinea pig (5), pig (4) rat (3), and rabbit (0.8). We conclude that measurement of ER across in vitro skin membranes provides a robust measurement of skin barrier integrity and is an appropriate alternative to Kp for T2O in order to identify intact membranes that have acceptable permeability characteristics for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15046783     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2003.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  49 in total

1.  Recovery of skin barrier after stratum corneum removal by microdermabrasion.

Authors:  Samantha Andrews; Jeong Woo Lee; Mark Prausnitz
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Investigating transdermal delivery of vitamin D3.

Authors:  Ahmed Alsaqr; Mohammed Rasoully; Florin Marcel Musteata
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Transdermal delivery of human growth hormone via laser-generated micropores.

Authors:  Yang Song; Karishma Hemmady; Ashana Puri; Ajay K Banga
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Distribution and visualisation of chlorhexidine within the skin using ToF-SIMS: a potential platform for the design of more efficacious skin antiseptic formulations.

Authors:  Amy M Judd; David J Scurr; Jon R Heylings; Ka-Wai Wan; Gary P Moss
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Skin Delivery and Irritation Potential of Phenmetrazine as a Candidate Transdermal Formulation for Repurposed Indications.

Authors:  Ying Jiang; Kevin S Murnane; Sonalika A Bhattaccharjee; Bruce E Blough; Ajay K Banga
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Synthesis of a semi-interpenetrating polymer network as a bioactive curcumin film.

Authors:  Naeema Mayet; Pradeep Kumar; Yahya E Choonara; Lomas K Tomar; Charu Tyagi; Lisa C du Toit; Viness Pillay
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Magnetophoresis in combination with chemical enhancers for transdermal drug delivery.

Authors:  Srinivasa M Sammeta; Michael A Repka; S Narasimha Murthy
Journal:  Drug Dev Ind Pharm       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Motor Recovery Studies Exhibit a Dose-Response Relationship.

Authors:  Pratik Y Chhatbar; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Steven Kautz; Mark S George; Robert J Adams; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  The Tritiated Water Skin Barrier Integrity Test: Considerations for Acceptance Criteria with and Without 14C-Octanol.

Authors:  Paul A Lehman; Kacie Beatch; Sam G Raney; Thomas J Franz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Development and in vitro evaluation of a nanoemulsion for transcutaneous delivery.

Authors:  Grace Ledet; Sarala Pamujula; Valencia Walker; Shana Simon; Richard Graves; Tarun K Mandal
Journal:  Drug Dev Ind Pharm       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.