| Literature DB >> 33810290 |
Nisar Ahmad Zahid1,2, Hawa Z E Jaafar1, Mansor Hakiman1,3.
Abstract
'Bentong' ginger is the most popular variety of Zingiber officinale in Malaysia. It is vegetatively propagated and requires a high proportion of rhizomes as starting planting materials. Besides, ginger vegetative propagation using its rhizomes is accompanied by several types of soil-borne diseases. Plant tissue culture techniques have been applied in many plant species to produce their disease-free planting materials. As 'Bentong' ginger is less known for its micropropagation, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of Clorox (5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)) on explant surface sterilization, effects of plant growth regulators, and basal media on shoots' multiplication and rooting. The secondary metabolites and antioxidant activities of the micropropagated plants were evaluated in comparison with conventionally propagated plants. Rhizome sprouted buds were effectively sterilized in 70% Clorox for 30 min by obtaining 75% contamination-free explants. Murashige and Skoog (MS) supplemented with 10 µM of zeatin was the suitable medium for shoot multiplication, which resulted in the highest number of shoots per explant (4.28). MS medium supplemented with 7.5 µM 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) resulted in the highest number of roots per plantlet. The in vitro-rooted plantlets were successfully acclimatized with a 95% survival rate in the ex vitro conditions. The phytochemical analysis showed that total phenolic acid and total flavonoid content and antioxidant activities of the micropropagated plants were not significantly different from the conventionally propagated plants of 'Bentong' ginger. In conclusion, the present study's outcome can be adopted for large-scale propagation of disease-free planting materials of 'Bentong' ginger.Entities:
Keywords: Zingiber officinale Roscoe; flavonoid; micropropagation; multiplication; phenolic acid; rooting; surface sterilization
Year: 2021 PMID: 33810290 PMCID: PMC8066238 DOI: 10.3390/plants10040630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Effects of different Clorox concentrations for 30 min immersion on explant surface sterilization and survival rate of ‘Bentong’ ginger rhizome sprouted buds explants.
| Treatment (Clorox® %) | Aseptic Culture ± SE (%) | Survival Rate ± SE (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.00 ± 0.00 e | 0.00 ± 0.00 d |
| 30 | 41.25 ± 3.75 d | 100.00 ± 0.00 a |
| 40 | 43.75 ± 3.15 cd | 100.00 ± 0.00 a |
| 50 | 51.25 ± 3.75 bc | 100.00 ± 0.00 a |
| 60 | 57.5 ± 3.23 b | 91.48 ± 3.41 b |
| 70 | 75 ± 3.54 a | 83.60 ± 4.18 c |
Values are means ± standard error (SE) (n = 80). Means within columns followed by the different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT).
Figure 1Micropropagation of ‘Bentong’ ginger. (A) Rhizome sprouted bud of ‘Bentong’ ginger used as explant for culture initiation; (B) aseptically established culture when surface sterilized with 70% Clorox after four weeks of inoculation; (C) in vitro-raised shoot used as explant for shoot multiplication (after 10 days of inoculation on MS medium supplemented with 10 µM zeatin); (D) multiple shoots produced in MS medium supplemented with 10 µM of zeatin after six weeks of inoculation; (E) in vitro-raised shoot used as explant for rooting; (F) in vitro-rooted plantlet derived from MS medium supplemented with 7.5 µM NAA after four weeks of culture; (G) acclimatized plantlets after three weeks of acclimatization; (H) in vitro-raised plant of ‘Bentong’ ginger after seven months of transplanting.
Effects of different types of cytokinins on the percentage of explants responded to multiple shoots induction, number of days to shoot initiation, number of shoots per explant, shoot length, number of leaves per shoot, and number of roots per explant of ‘Bentong’ ginger after six weeks of culture.
| Cytokinin (µM) | Explant Responded to Shoot Induction (%) | Number of Days to Shoot Initiation | Number of Shoots/Explant | Shoots Length (cm) | Number of Leaves/Shoot | Number of Roots/Explant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (0) | 77.78 | 10.83 ± 0.20 a | 1.93 ± 0.12 e | 3.73 ± 0.07 a | 2.43 ± 0.12 b | 4.07 ± 0.12 c |
| Zeatin (10) | 100 | 6.87 ± 0.31 d | 4.07 ± 0.12 a | 3.71 ± 0.07 a | 2.90 ± 0.19 a | 9.43 ± 0.42 a |
| BAP (10) | 100 | 7.13 ± 0.39 cd | 3.53 ± 0.17 b | 3.51 ± 0.15 a | 2.45 ± 0.17 b | 7.43 ± 0.31 b |
| Kinetin (10) | 86.67 | 8.60 ± 0.27 b | 2.40 ± 0.19 c | 3.48 ± 0.35 a | 2.05 ± 0.12 b | 6.03 ± 0.37 b |
| TDZ (5) | 93.33 | 8.00 ± 0.35 bc | 3.07 ± 0.16 d | 1.08 ± 0.07 b | 1.20 ± 0.12 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 d |
Values are means ± standard error (n = 30). Means followed by the same letters in each column are not significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). BAP = 6-benzylaminopurine and TDZ = thidiazuron.
Main effects of different basal media and zeatin concentrations on number of days to shoot initiation, number of shoots per explant, shoot length, number of leaves per shoot, and number of roots per explant of Bentong ginger after six weeks of inoculation.
| Treatment | Number of Days to Shoot Initiation | Number of Shoots/Explant | Shoot Length (cm) | Number of Leaves/Shoot | Number of Roots/Explant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Media | |||||
| MS | 10.83 ± 0.40 b | 3.35 ± 0.19 a | 3.33 ± 0.11 a | 2.80 ± 0.10 a | 5.40 ± 0.20 b |
| LS | 10.70 ± 0.36 b | 3.15 ± 0.18 a | 3.35 ± 0.11 a | 2.88 ± 0.10 a | 5.79 ± 0.20 b |
| B5 | 12.98 ± 0.62 a | 2.90 ± 0.21 b | 2.77 ± 0.14 b | 1.87 ± 0.06 b | 6.60 ± 0.34 a |
| Zeatin (µM) | |||||
| 0 | 13.33 ± 0.61 a | 1.98 ± 0.12 d | 3.77 ± 0.10 a | 2.49 ± 0.18 abc | 4.59 ± 0.17 c |
| 5 | 12.44 ± 0.54 ab | 2.95 ± 0.10 c | 3.00 ± 0.20 bc | 2.67 ± 0.22 ab | 6.50 ± 0.29 a |
| 10 | 11.89 ± 0.61 b | 3.81 ± 0.17 a | 3.16 ± 0.12 b | 2.80 ± 0.23 a | 6.46 ± 0.30 ab |
| 15 | 10.83 ± 0.46 c | 3.58 ± 0.11 ab | 3.07 ± 0.16 bc | 2.39 ± 0.15 bc | 6.28 ± 0.30 ab |
| 20 | 9.02 ± 0.14 d | 3.34 ± 0.13 b | 2.76 ± 0.13 c | 2.23 ± 0.16 c | 5.81 ± 0.32 b |
| F value | |||||
| Media | 25.99 *** | 8.51 ** | 13.18 *** | 50.22 *** | 13.18 *** |
| Zeatin (µM) | 26.26 *** | 52.29 *** | 10.59 *** | 4.77 ** | 13.36 *** |
| Media × Zeatin (µM) | 1.76 ns | 2.52 * | 0.89 ns | 0.5 ns | 1.34 ns |
| CV (%) | 8.44 | 9.51 | 11.03 | 12.25 | 11.01 |
Values are means ± standard error (n = 18). Means followed by the same letters in each column are not significantly different at * p < 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). F value represented ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, and ns = not significant. CV = coefficient of variation, MS = Murashige and Skoog medium, LS = Linsmaier and Skoog medium, and B5 = Gamborg et al. medium.
Interaction effects of different basal media and zeatin concentrations on the number of shoots per explant of ‘Bentong’ ginger after six weeks of culture.
| Zeatin (µM) | Basal Media | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MS | LS | B5 | |
| 0 | 2.22 ± 0.11 g | 2.17 ± 0.17 g | 1.56 ± 0.06 h |
| 5 | 3.19 ± 0.10 cde | 3.00 ± 0.19 ef | 2.66 ± 0.09 fg |
| 10 | 4.28 ± 0.15 a | 3.90 ± 0.21 ab | 3.27 ± 0.07 cde |
| 15 | 3.73 ± 0.13 bc | 3.57 ± 0.23 bcd | 3.43 ± 0.23 b-e |
| 20 | 3.31 ± 0.19 cde | 3.12 ± 0.25 def | 3.58 ± 0.22 bcd |
Values are means ± standard error (n = 18). Means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). MS = Murashige and Skoog medium, LS = Linsmaier and Skoog medium, and B5 = Gamborg et al. medium.
Effect of different types and concentrations of auxin on rooting of in vitro-raised shoot of ’Bentong’ ginger after four weeks of the culture.
| Treatment (Auxin) | Auxin Concentration (µM) | Plantlet Responded to Rooting (%) | Number of Days to Root Initiation | Number of Roots/Explant | Root Length (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 100 | 6.06 ± 0.47 a | 6.33 ± 0.38 e | 3.16 ± 0.19 bc |
| IAA | 2.5 | 100 | 5.89 ± 0.22 a | 10.44 ± 0.62 bc | 2.77 ± 0.21 bcd |
| IAA | 5 | 100 | 5.44 ± 0.48 a | 8.22 ± 0.59 de | 3.94 ± 0.29 a |
| IAA | 7.5 | 100 | 6.00 ± 0.19 a | 6.67 ± 0.33 e | 3.41 ± 0.29 ab |
| IBA | 2.5 | 100 | 5.67 ± 0.51 a | 7.22 ± 0.56 de | 2.67 ± 0.24 cde |
| IBA | 5 | 100 | 6.22 ± 0.48 a | 9.11 ± 0.40 cd | 3.35 ± 0.28 abc |
| IBA | 7.5 | 100 | 6.33 ± 0.33 a | 9.22 ± 0.48 cd | 2.78 ± 0.2 bcd |
| NAA | 2.5 | 100 | 6.00 ± 0.38 a | 10.56 ± 0.78 bc | 1.93 ± 0.14 f |
| NAA | 5 | 100 | 6.11 ± 0.4 a | 11.67 ± 1.02 b | 2.03 ± 0.16 ef |
| NAA | 7.5 | 100 | 6.78 ± 0.59 a | 15.44 ± 0.80 a | 2.19 ± 0.11 edf |
Value are means ± standard error (n = 18). Means followed by different letters in each column are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). IAA = indole-3-acetic acid, NAA = 1-naphthaleneacetic acid, and IBA = indole-3-butyric acid.
Total phenolic acid and flavonoid content of micropropagated and conventionally propagated rhizomes of ‘Bentong’ ginger.
| Propagation | Solvent | Phenolic Acid (mg GAE/g DW) | Flavonoid (mg RE/g DW) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional | Aqueous | 16.53 ± 0.45 c | 16.73 ± 0.53 cd |
| Ethanol | 23.1 ± 0.43 a | 32.2 ± 0.64 b | |
| Acetone | 19.85 ± 0.42 b | 51.75 ± 1.39 a | |
| Hexane | 8.32 ± 0.63 d | 14.65 ± 0.39 d | |
| Mean | 16.95 | 28.83 | |
| Micropropagation | Aqueous | 16.64 ± 0.37 c | 18.75 ± 0.45 c |
| Ethanol | 23.93 ± 0.48 a | 33.74 ± 0.49 b | |
| Acetone | 21.1 ± 0.43 b | 52.53 ± 2.01 a | |
| Hexane | 8.85 ± 0.52 d | 16.08 ± 0.7 cd | |
| Mean | 17.68 | 30.28 | |
| F value | |||
| Propagation | 4.16 ns | 4.30 ns | |
| Solvent | 373.56 *** | 595.03 *** | |
| Propagation × Solvent | 0.52 ns | 0.14 ns | |
| CV (%) | 4.74 | 5.76 | |
Values are means ± standard error (n = 12). Means followed by different letters in each column are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). F value represented *** = p < 0.001 and ns = not significant.
2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay of micropropagated and conventionally propagated rhizomes of ‘Bentong’ ginger.
| Propagation | Solvent | DPPH Inhibition (%) | FRAP (mg TE/g DW) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional | Aqueous | 58.25 ± 0.01 c | 40.39 ± 0.69 c |
| Ethanol | 75.46 ± 2.58 ab | 62.96 ± 0.67 ab | |
| Acetone | 71.61 ± 0.65 b | 59.76 ± 1.17 b | |
| Hexane | 61.56 ± 0.92 c | 40.48 ± 2.07 c | |
| Mean | 66.72 | 50.90 | |
| Micropropagation | Aqueous | 63.32 ± 3.41 c | 42.52 ± 0.64 c |
| Ethanol | 77.01 ± 0.83 a | 64.10 ± 1.78 a | |
| Acetone | 72.28 ± 1.16 ab | 60.59 ± 1.16 ab | |
| Hexane | 63.55 ± 0.25 c | 43.37 ± 0.52 c | |
| Mean | 69.04 | 52.65 | |
| F value | |||
| Propagation | 3.98 ns | 4.15 ns | |
| Solvent | 40.69 *** | 186.35 *** | |
| Propagation × Solvent | 0.68 ns | 0.3 ns | |
| CV (%) | 4.2 | 4.06 | |
Values are means ± standard error (n = 12). Means followed by different letters in each column are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). F value represented *** = p < 0.001 and ns = not significant.