Literature DB >> 34072127

Outcomes Related to Percutaneous Nephrostomies (PCN) in Malignancy-Associated Ureteric Obstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Francesca J New1, Sally J Deverill2, Bhaskar K Somani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant ureteric obstruction occurs in a variety of cancers and has been typically associated with a poor prognosis. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) can potentially help increase patient longevity by establishing urinary drainage and treating renal failure. Our aim was to look at the outcomes of PCN in patients with advanced cancer and the impact on the patients' lifespan and quality of life.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was carried out for articles from 2000 to 2020 on PCN in patients with advanced malignancies, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar. All English-language articles reporting on a minimum of 20 patients who underwent PCN for malignancy-associated ureteric obstruction were included.
RESULTS: A total of 21 articles (1674 patients) met the inclusion criteria with a mean of 60.2 years (range: 21-102 years). PCN was performed for ureteric obstruction secondary to urological malignancies (n = -633, 37.8%), gynaecological malignancies (n = 437, 26.1%), colorectal and GI malignancies (n = 216, 12.9%), and other specified malignancies (n = 205, 12.2%). The reported mean survival times varied from 2 to 8.5 months post PCN insertion, with an average survival time of 5.6 months, which depended on the cancer type, stage, and previous treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced malignancies who need PCN tend to have a survival rate under 12 months and spend a large proportion of this time in the hospital. Although the advent of newer chemotherapy and immunotherapy options has changed the landscape of managing advanced cancer, decisions on nephrostomy must be balanced with their survival and quality of life, which must be discussed with the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; nephrostomy; prostate cancer; quality of life; survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 34072127     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  24 in total

1.  The role of percutaneous nephrostomy in malignant ureteric obstruction.

Authors:  J R Wilson; G H Urwin; M J Stower
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  A qualitative study exploring male cancer patients' experiences with percutaneous nephrostomy.

Authors:  Lene Hyldgaard Bigum; Marlène Elisabeth Spielmann; Gitte Juhl; Annlise Rasmussen
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 1.612

3.  Percutaneous nephrostomy in obstructing pelvic malignancy does not facilitate further oncological treatment.

Authors:  Samuel Stephen Folkard; Srijit Banerjee; Richard Menzies-Wilson; Joseph Reason; Evangelos Psallidas; Elliot Clissold; Ahmad Al-Mushatat; Saurabh Chaudhri; James Stephen Arthur Green
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

5.  The role of percutaneous nephrostomy in malignant urinary tract obstruction.

Authors:  A F Watkinson; R P A'Hern; A Jones; D M King; E C Moskovic
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Percutaneous nephrostomy for ureteric obstruction due to advanced pelvic malignancy: have we got the balance right?

Authors:  Saumya Misra; Charles Coker; Jonathan Richenberg
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with tumors of advanced stage: treatment dilemmas and impact on clinical course and quality of life.

Authors:  Evangelos Aravantinos; Theodore Anagnostou; Anastasios D Karatzas; Wassileios Papakonstantinou; Michael Samarinas; Michael D Melekos
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Palliative percutaneous nephrostomy in recurrent cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dienstmann; Cristhiane da Silva Pinto; Margarida Tutungi Pereira; Isabele Avila Small; Carlos Gil Ferreira
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Prognostic factors in malignant ureteric obstruction.

Authors:  Andrew Lienert; Andrew Ing; Stephen Mark
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Prognostic model for predicting survival after palliative urinary diversion for ureteral obstruction: analysis of 140 cases.

Authors:  Junichiro Ishioka; Yukio Kageyama; Masaharu Inoue; Yotsuo Higashi; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Predictors of nadir serum creatinine after drainage of bilaterally obstructed kidneys due to different etiologies.

Authors:  Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem; Ahmed Mahmoud Abdelraouf; Ahmed Mohammed El-Taher; Abdelfattah Ibrahim Ahmed; Nasreldin Mohammed
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.266

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.