Literature DB >> 18554655

Prognostic model for predicting survival after palliative urinary diversion for ureteral obstruction: analysis of 140 cases.

Junichiro Ishioka1, Yukio Kageyama, Masaharu Inoue, Yotsuo Higashi, Kazunori Kihara.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We identified patients with ureteral obstruction likely to benefit from palliative urinary diversion so that they can be advised appropriately.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 140 patients with obstructive nephropathy secondary to advanced incurable malignant disease underwent percutaneous nephrostomy urinary diversion. Several variables were investigated including sex, age, type of primary malignancy, events related to malignant dissemination (metastasis, ascites and pleural effusion), number of events related to malignant dissemination, degree of hydronephrosis, location of obstruction, interval from initial diagnosis of bilateral hydronephrosis to percutaneous nephrostomy, and serum creatinine, hemoglobin and serum albumin levels before nephrostomy.
RESULTS: Median overall survival was 96 days (range 2 to 1,283). The 1, 6 and 12-month survival rates were 78%, 30% and 12%, respectively. On multivariate analysis the number of events related to malignant dissemination (3 or more), degree of hydronephrosis (grade 1 or 2) and serum albumin before nephrostomy (3 gm/dl or less) were significantly associated with a short survival time. The patients were divided into 3 risk groups of favorable-0 risk factors (34 patients), intermediate-1 risk factor (60) and poor-2 or 3 risk factors (41). There were significant differences in the survival profiles of the 3 risk groups (p <0.0001). The 6-month survival rates for the favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups were 69%, 24% and 2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The current stratification model may represent a useful tool for clinicians treating patients with ureteral obstruction due to advanced cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18554655     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Management of ureteral obstruction in crossed fused renal ectopia: A case report.

Authors:  Nicholas Bhojwani; Jason Brett Hartman; Manzoor Ahmed; Robert Morgan; Jon C Davidson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Percutaneous nephrostomy: technical aspects and indications.

Authors:  Mandeep Dagli; Parvati Ramchandani
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Use of percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stenting in management of ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  Linda Hsu; Hanhan Li; Daniel Pucheril; Moritz Hansen; Raymond Littleton; James Peabody; Jesse Sammon
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-06

4.  Percutaneous nephrostomy in obstructing pelvic malignancy does not facilitate further oncological treatment.

Authors:  Samuel Stephen Folkard; Srijit Banerjee; Richard Menzies-Wilson; Joseph Reason; Evangelos Psallidas; Elliot Clissold; Ahmad Al-Mushatat; Saurabh Chaudhri; James Stephen Arthur Green
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Acute reversible kidney injury secondary to bilateral ureteric obstruction.

Authors:  Michael Organ; Richard W Norman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Comparison of single and tandem ureteral stenting for malignant ureteral obstruction: a prospective study of 104 patients.

Authors:  Kao-Lang Liu; Bo-Ching Lee; Jian-De Ye; Yu-Hsuan Chang; Chin-Chen Chang; Kuo-How Huang; Yuan-Ju Lee; Yeun-Chung Chang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Clinical outcome and management of ureteral obstruction secondary to gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Akihiko Watanabe; Shoji Samma; Takao Ohyama; Hirofumi Ishikawa; Yoriaki Kagebayashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  [Management of ureteral obstruction : Value of percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stents].

Authors:  C Netsch; B Becker; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Aggressive approach in a case of cancer cervix with uremia.

Authors:  Mg Janaki; S Mukesh; Tr Arul Ponni; S Nirmala
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2010-01

10.  Percutaneous nephrostomy for ureteric obstruction due to advanced pelvic malignancy: have we got the balance right?

Authors:  Saumya Misra; Charles Coker; Jonathan Richenberg
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.