Literature DB >> 18395404

Palliative percutaneous nephrostomy in recurrent cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive cases.

Rodrigo Dienstmann1, Cristhiane da Silva Pinto, Margarida Tutungi Pereira, Isabele Avila Small, Carlos Gil Ferreira.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a public health problem in Brazil, with annual incidence rates of 20-40 cases/100,000 women. Most patients with recurrent disease have symptoms from locoregional disease and may develop renal failure. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of patients with recurrent cervical cancer who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (PN). We reviewed the medical records of 50 such patients who were referred to the Palliative Care Unit of the Brazilian National Cancer Institute from January 2002 to October 2006. Median age was 44 years (range, 26-67 years). Half the patients had improvement in pain or uremic symptoms, and seven (14%) had improved performance status (PS) after the procedure. Thirty patients (60%) had improvement of renal function; median creatinine levels before and after PN were 6.4 and 3.7mg/dL, respectively (P<0.05). Median overall survival after PN was 8.9 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.4-10.3). Median survival was 9.9 weeks (95% CI: 8.7-11.0) in 40 patients with baseline PS 1-3 and one week (95% CI: 0.1-1.9) in 10 patients with PS 4 (log rank, P<0.0001). Median survival in patients with and without improvement of renal function after PN was 10.0 weeks (95% CI: 8.6-11.3) and 2.6 weeks (95% CI: 0-11.3), respectively (log rank, P=0.01). Twenty-nine patients (58%) died from renal failure. Complications were mainly urinary tract infection (n=10), catheter loss (n=9), and bleeding (n=1). These data suggest that PN can be of clinical benefit for carefully selected patients with recurrent cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18395404     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  6 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrostomy in obstructing pelvic malignancy does not facilitate further oncological treatment.

Authors:  Samuel Stephen Folkard; Srijit Banerjee; Richard Menzies-Wilson; Joseph Reason; Evangelos Psallidas; Elliot Clissold; Ahmad Al-Mushatat; Saurabh Chaudhri; James Stephen Arthur Green
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  In Vitro Study of Antimicrobial Percutaneous Nephrostomy Catheters for Prevention of Renal Infections.

Authors:  Nylev Vargas-Cruz; Ruth A Reitzel; Joel Rosenblatt; Mohamed Jamal; Ariel D Szvalb; Anne-Marie Chaftari; Ray Hachem; Issam Raad
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Malignant ureteric obstruction decompression: how much gain for how much pain? A narrative review.

Authors:  Joanna Prentice; Tarik Amer; Ali Tasleem; Omar Aboumarzouk
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Factors Affecting Survival Outcome After Percutaneous Nephrostomy as Palliative Urinary Diversion in Obstructive Uropathy due to Advance Cervical Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Bambang Sasongko Noegroho; Andri Pratama Kurniawan; Zola Wijayanti; Akhmad Mustafa
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 5.  Practical aspects of palliative care & palliative radiotherapy in incurable cervical cancer.

Authors:  Reena George; Bhavana Rai
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

Review 6.  Outcomes Related to Percutaneous Nephrostomies (PCN) in Malignancy-Associated Ureteric Obstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Francesca J New; Sally J Deverill; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.