Literature DB >> 34070937

Comparing the Effectiveness of a Wearable Activity Tracker in Addition to Counseling and Counseling Only to Reinforce Leisure-Time Physical Activity among Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sunga Kong1,2, Jae Kyung Lee2, Danbee Kang1,3, Nayeon Kim4, Young Mog Shim5, Won Park6, Dooho Choi6, Juhee Cho1,3,7.   

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of a wearable activity tracker (WAT) in addition to counseling (WAT+counseling) and counseling only for reinforcing leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) among breast cancer patients during radiotherapy (RT). A total of 152 breast cancer patients who were planning to undergo radiation therapy (RT) after surgery participated in the study. The WAT+counseling group (n = 76) underwent physical activity (PA) self-monitoring using a WAT and participated in counseling. The counseling-only group (n = 76) received telephone counseling once a week during RT and did not receive WAT. The WAT+counseling group had increased relative change in self-reported LTPA (102.8) compared with the counseling-only group (57.8) immediately after RT compared to baseline. Although the relative changes of self-reported LTPA of the WAT+counseling group were higher at three and six months after the end of RT compared to in the counseling-only group, the results were not significant. The mean average daily step count of the WAT+counseling group was 9351.7, which increased to 11,592.2 during RT and 12,240.1 after RT. In the subgroup analysis, patients who did not perform regular PA before cancer diagnosis had significantly increased step counts. This study shows the feasibility of WAT with counseling to reinforce PA among breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; physical activity; radiation therapy; reinforcing factor; step counters; wearable activity tracker

Year:  2021        PMID: 34070937     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  54 in total

Review 1.  An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca M Speck; Kerry S Courneya; Louise C Mâsse; Sue Duval; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Stage of change and motivation to healthy diet and habitual physical activity in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  E Centis; M Trento; A Dei Cas; A E Pontiroli; P De Feo; A Bruno; A S Sasdelli; F Arturi; F Strollo; S Vigili De' Kreutzenberg; C Invitti; P Di Bonito; M Di Mauro; G Pugliese; A Molteni; G Marchesini
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  Efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel technology-based intervention to support physical activity in cancer survivors.

Authors:  Nancy M Gell; Kristin W Grover; Morgan Humble; Michelle Sexton; Kim Dittus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Effects of the BEAT Cancer physical activity behavior change intervention on physical activity, aerobic fitness, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura Q Rogers; Kerry S Courneya; Philip M Anton; Patricia Hopkins-Price; Steven Verhulst; Sandra K Vicari; Randall S Robbs; Robert Mocharnuk; Edward McAuley
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Concurrent Validity of Wearable Activity Trackers Under Free-Living Conditions.

Authors:  Skyler M Brooke; Hyun-Sung An; Seoung-Ki Kang; John M Noble; Kris E Berg; Jung-Min Lee
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 6.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dena M Bravata; Crystal Smith-Spangler; Vandana Sundaram; Allison L Gienger; Nancy Lin; Robyn Lewis; Christopher D Stave; Ingram Olkin; John R Sirard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: a systematic review of behaviour theories.

Authors:  Dominika Kwasnicka; Stephan U Dombrowski; Martin White; Falko Sniehotta
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-03-07

8.  Evaluating Motivational Interviewing and Habit Formation to Enhance the Effect of Activity Trackers on Healthy Adults' Activity Levels: Randomized Intervention.

Authors:  Laura D Ellingson; Jeni E Lansing; Kathryn J DeShaw; Karissa L Peyer; Yang Bai; Maria Perez; L Alison Phillips; Gregory J Welk
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour.

Authors:  Claire L Cleland; Ruth F Hunter; Frank Kee; Margaret E Cupples; James F Sallis; Mark A Tully
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Reliability and validity of two fitness tracker devices in the laboratory and home environment for older community-dwelling people.

Authors:  Elissa Burton; Keith D Hill; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani; Gill Lewin; Eileen Boyle; Erin Howie
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.921

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effectiveness of physical activity monitors in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rasmus Tolstrup Larsen; Vibeke Wagner; Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen; Camilla Keller; Carsten Bogh Juhl; Henning Langberg; Jan Christensen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-01-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.