Literature DB >> 27465631

Concurrent Validity of Wearable Activity Trackers Under Free-Living Conditions.

Skyler M Brooke1, Hyun-Sung An, Seoung-Ki Kang, John M Noble, Kris E Berg, Jung-Min Lee.   

Abstract

Brooke, SM, An, H-S, Kang, S-K, Noble, JM, Berg, KE, and Lee, J-M. Concurrent validity of wearable activity trackers under free-living conditions. J Strength Cond Res 31(4): 1097-1106, 2017-The purpose of this study is to evaluate the concurrent validity of wearable activity trackers in energy expenditure (EE) and sleep period time (SPT) under free-living conditions. Ninety-five (28.5 ± 9.8 years) healthy men (n = 34) and women (n = 61) participated in this study. The total EE and SPT were measured using 8 monitors: Nike+ FuelBand SE (NFB), Garmin VivoFit (VF), Misfit Shine (MF), Fitbit Flex (FF), Jawbone UP (JU), Polar Loop (PL), Fitbit Charge HR (FC), and SenseWear Armband Mini (SWA) (criterion measures: SWA for EE and a sleep log for SPT). The mean absolute percent error (MAPE) for EE was 13.0, 15.2, 15.5, 16.1, 16.2, 22.8, and 24.5% for PL, MF, FF, NFB, FC, JU, and VF, respectively. Mean absolute percent errors were calculated for SPT to be 4.0, 8.8, 10.2, 11.5, 12.9, 13.6, 17.5, and 21.61% for VF, FF, JU, FC, MF, SWA laying down, PL, and SWA, respectively. Concurrent validity was examined using equivalence testing on EE (equivalence zone: 2,889.7-3,531.9 kcal); 2 trackers fell short of falling in the zone: PL (2,714.4-3,164.8 kcal) and FC (2,473.8-3,066.5 kcal). For SPT (equivalence zone: 420.6-514.0 minutes), several monitors fell in the zone: PL (448.3-485.6 minutes), MS (442.8-492.2 minutes), and FF (427.7-486.7 minutes). This study suggests that the PL and FC provide a reasonable estimate of EE under free-living conditions. The PL, FC, and MF were the most valid monitors used for measuring SPT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27465631     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  26 in total

Review 1.  Feeling validated yet? A scoping review of the use of consumer-targeted wearable and mobile technology to measure and improve sleep.

Authors:  Kelly Glazer Baron; Jennifer Duffecy; Mark A Berendsen; Ivy Cheung Mason; Emily G Lattie; Natalie C Manalo
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 11.609

2.  How reliable are commercially available trackers in detecting daytime sleep.

Authors:  Philip Lambrechtse; Victoria C Ziesenitz; Adam Cohen; Johannes N van den Anker; Ernst Jan Bos
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Trauma, Sleep and Mental Health Problems in Low-Income Young Adults.

Authors:  Rachel A Fusco; Yan Yuan; Hyunji Lee; Christina E Newhill
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Influence of upper limb activity on the step count and accuracy of sleep time of a wristband-type physical activity tracker.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Sano; Takanori Taniguchi; Hisato Nakazono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Impact of Volume and Type of Overnight Pages on Resident Sleep During Home Call.

Authors:  Adam E Ludvigson; Stephen T Ryan; Christina R Gentile; Gregory J Mills; Graham T VerLee; Moritz H Hansen
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-10

6.  Review of Validity and Reliability of Garmin Activity Trackers.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Camden L Spade
Journal:  J Meas Phys Behav       Date:  2020-06

7.  Monitoring the recovery time of children after tonsillectomy using commercial activity trackers.

Authors:  Philip Lambrechtse; Victoria C Ziesenitz; Andrew Atkinson; Ernst Jan Bos; Tatjana Welzel; Yael Gilgen; Nicolas Gürtler; Simone Heuscher; Adam Frederik Cohen; Johannes N van den Anker
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  A Mobile Health Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Anna R Hemnes; Luke G Silverman-Lloyd; Shi Huang; Grant MacKinnon; Jeffrey Annis; Carolyn S Whitmore; Ravinder Mallugari; Rashundra N Oggs; Rezzan Hekmat; Rongzi Shan; Pauline P Huynh; Chang Yu; Seth S Martin; Michael J Blaha; Evan L Brittain
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 10.262

Review 9.  The Effectiveness of Wearable Devices as Physical Activity Interventions for Preventing and Treating Obesity in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wentao Wang; Jing Cheng; Weijun Song; Yi Shen
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.947

10.  Comparing the Effectiveness of a Wearable Activity Tracker in Addition to Counseling and Counseling Only to Reinforce Leisure-Time Physical Activity among Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sunga Kong; Jae Kyung Lee; Danbee Kang; Nayeon Kim; Young Mog Shim; Won Park; Dooho Choi; Juhee Cho
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.