INTRODUCTION: Approximately 11.1 million cancer survivors are alive in the United States. Activity prescriptions for cancer survivors rely on evidence as to whether exercise during or after treatment results in improved health outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the extent to which physical activity during and post treatment is appropriate and effective across the cancer control continuum. METHODS: A systematic quantitative review of the English language scientific literature searched controlled trials of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors during and post treatment. Data from 82 studies were abstracted, weighted mean effect sizes (WMES) were calculated from 66 high quality studies, and a systematic level of evidence criteria was applied to evaluate 60 outcomes. Reports of adverse events were abstracted from all studies. RESULTS: Quantitative evidence shows a large effect of physical activity interventions post treatment on upper and lower body strength (WMES = 0.99 & 0.90, p < 0.0001 & 0.024, respectively) and moderate effects on fatigue and breast cancer-specific concerns (WMES = -0.54 & 0.62, p = 0.003 & 0.003, respectively). A small to moderate positive effect of physical activity during treatment was seen for physical activity level, aerobic fitness, muscular strength, functional quality of life, anxiety, and self-esteem. With few exceptions, exercise was well tolerated during and post treatment without adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests many health benefits from physical activity during and post cancer treatments. Additional studies are needed in cancer diagnoses other than breast and with a focus on survivors in greatest need of improvements for the health outcomes of interest.
INTRODUCTION: Approximately 11.1 million cancer survivors are alive in the United States. Activity prescriptions for cancer survivors rely on evidence as to whether exercise during or after treatment results in improved health outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the extent to which physical activity during and post treatment is appropriate and effective across the cancer control continuum. METHODS: A systematic quantitative review of the English language scientific literature searched controlled trials of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors during and post treatment. Data from 82 studies were abstracted, weighted mean effect sizes (WMES) were calculated from 66 high quality studies, and a systematic level of evidence criteria was applied to evaluate 60 outcomes. Reports of adverse events were abstracted from all studies. RESULTS: Quantitative evidence shows a large effect of physical activity interventions post treatment on upper and lower body strength (WMES = 0.99 & 0.90, p < 0.0001 & 0.024, respectively) and moderate effects on fatigue and breast cancer-specific concerns (WMES = -0.54 & 0.62, p = 0.003 & 0.003, respectively). A small to moderate positive effect of physical activity during treatment was seen for physical activity level, aerobic fitness, muscular strength, functional quality of life, anxiety, and self-esteem. With few exceptions, exercise was well tolerated during and post treatment without adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests many health benefits from physical activity during and post cancer treatments. Additional studies are needed in cancer diagnoses other than breast and with a focus on survivors in greatest need of improvements for the health outcomes of interest.
Authors: B A Cunningham; G Morris; C L Cheney; N Buergel; S N Aker; P Lenssen Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 1986 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Dean Ornish; Gerdi Weidner; William R Fair; Ruth Marlin; Elaine B Pettengill; Caren J Raisin; Stacey Dunn-Emke; Lila Crutchfield; F Nicholas Jacobs; R James Barnard; William J Aronson; Patricia McCormac; Damien J McKnight; Jordan D Fein; Ann M Dnistrian; Jeanmaire Weinstein; Tung H Ngo; Nancy R Mendell; Peter R Carroll Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Elizabeth C Clipp; Miriam C Morey; Carl F Pieper; Richard Sloane; Denise Clutter Snyder; Harvey J Cohen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Victoria Mock; Constantine Frangakis; Nancy E Davidson; Mary E Ropka; Mary Pickett; Barbara Poniatowski; Kerry J Stewart; Lane Cameron; Kristin Zawacki; Laura J Podewils; Gary Cohen; Ruth McCorkle Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: K S Courneya; C M Friedenreich; H A Quinney; A L A Fields; L W Jones; A S Fairey Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Cindy L Carter; Georgiana Onicescu; Kathleen B Cartmell; Katherine R Sterba; James Tomsic; Anthony J Alberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Erin L McGowan; Amy E Speed-Andrews; Ryan E Rhodes; Chris M Blanchard; S Nicole Culos-Reed; Christine M Friedenreich; Kerry S Courneya Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-05-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lee W Jones; Yuanyuan Liang; Edith N Pituskin; Claudio L Battaglini; Jessica M Scott; Whitney E Hornsby; Mark Haykowsky Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011-01-06
Authors: C M Donnelly; A Lowe-Strong; J P Rankin; A Campbell; J M Blaney; J H Gracey Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Laura Q Rogers; Kerry S Courneya; Phillip M Anton; Patricia Hopkins-Price; Steven Verhulst; Randall S Robbs; Sandra K Vicari; Edward McAuley Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2017-04
Authors: Raheem J Paxton; Pratibha Nayak; Wendell C Taylor; Shine Chang; Kerry S Courneya; Leslie Schover; Kelly Hodges; Lovell A Jones Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 4.442