| Literature DB >> 34069262 |
Caterina Gabriele1, Licia E Prestagiacomo1, Giovanni Cuda1, Marco Gaspari1.
Abstract
Aberrant glycosylation has long been known to be associated with cancer, since it is involved in key mechanisms such as tumour onset, development and progression. This review will focus on protein glycosylation studies in cells, tissue, urine and serum in the context of prostate cancer. A dedicated section will cover the glycoforms of prostate specific antigen, the molecule that, despite some important limitations, is routinely tested for helping prostate cancer diagnosis. Our aim is to provide readers with an overview of mass spectrometry-based glycoproteomics of prostate cancer. From this perspective, the first part of this review will illustrate the main strategies for glycopeptide enrichment and mass spectrometric analysis. The molecular information obtained by glycoproteomic analysis performed by mass spectrometry has led to new insights into the mechanism linking aberrant glycosylation to cancer cell proliferation, migration and immunoescape.Entities:
Keywords: PSA; SPEG; TiO2; biomarker discovery; glycocapture; protein glycosylation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069262 PMCID: PMC8156230 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105222
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Bottom-up approach.
Figure 2This figure is a simple representation of the enrichment methods.
Main differentially abundant glycoproteins (DAPs) identified in cell cultures or PCa tissue by MS-based workflows. Plain text = discovery level; bold character = validation level; italic = protein is downregulated; (f) core-fucosylated glycopeptide; (g) glycopeptide.
| Ref. | Sample Groups | Workflow | Analyte | Main DAPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Cells: LNCaP and PC3 | SPEG | N-glycosites, | |
| [ | Cells: LNCaP/LAPC4 (NAG) vs. PC3/DU145 (AG) | LAC- | Glycopeptides | NT5E ( |
| [ | Cells: nonmetastatic (N2) and highly metastatic (ML2) PC3 | Met. Lab./SPE-SG | Sialo- | BSG, POSTN, GPI, |
| [ | Tissue: PCa versus normal | Met. Lab./SPE-SG | Sialo- | VDAC1, DPP2, EZRI, |
| [ | Tissue: NAG vs. AG | SPEG | N-glycosites | |
| [ | Tissue: N, NAG, AG, MET | SPEG | N-glycosites | AG vs. NAG: POSTN, ASPN, LAMB2, SERPINH1, CSPG2, ENTPD1, SEL1L, ITGAV, FOLH1, STIM1, |
| [ | Tissue: PCa vs. BPH | ZIC-HILIC | Intact | |
| [ | Cells: M2 vs. M1 macrophages | SPEG | N-glycosites | MRC1, CTSL, |
AUC values obtained by different combinations of candidate biomarkers in the discovery and validation cohorts [49].
| Panel of Candidate Biomarkers | Area under the ROC Curve (95% Confidence Interval) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | Validation | Validation | |
| 40 AG and | 40 AG and | ||
| ACPP & Serum PSA | 0.82 (0.75, 0.89) | 0.83 (0.74, 0.92) | 0.8 (0.67, 0.93) |
| ACPP & CLU & Serum PSA | 0.86 (0.8, 0.92) | 0.85 (0.76, 0.94) | 0.76 (0.6, 0.92) |
| ACPP & LOX & Serum PSA | 0.82 (0.75, 0.89) | 0.85 (0.76, 0.93) | 0.81 (0.69, 0.93) |
| ACPP & SERPINA1 & Serum PSA | 0.83 (0.76, 0.9) | 0.84 (0.75, 0.93) | 0.82 (0.7, 0.94) |
| ACPP & ORM1 & Serum PSA | 0.83 (0.76, 0.9) | 0.82 (0.72, 0.91) | 0.82 (0.71, 0.94) |
Main differentially abundant glycoproteins (DAPs) identified in PCa urine samples by MS-based workflows. Plain text = discovery level; bold character = validation level; italic = protein is downregulated.
| Reference | Sample | Sample Groups | Workflow | Analyte | Main DAPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Urine | AG vs. NAG | SPEG | N-glycosites | |
| [ | Urine | PCa vs. BPH | TiO2 and HILIC | Intact | |
| [ | EPS-urine | AG vs. NAG | C18/MAX tips | N-glycosites |
Main differentially abundant glycoproteins (DAPs) identified in PCa urine sample by MS-based workflows. Plain text = discovery level; bold character = validation level; italic = protein is downregulated; (f) core-fucosylated glycopeptide; (g) glycopeptide, (h) highly branched glycopeptide.
| Reference | Sample | Sample Groups | Workflow | Analyte | Main DAPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Serum | PCA vs. BPH | SPEG | N-glycosites | |
| [ | Serum | mCRPC | SPEG | N-glycosites | |
| [ | Serum | NAG vs. AG | SPEG | N-glycosites | CD44, IGHG2, ITIH2, CDH13 |
| [ | Serum | PCa vs. BPH | M-LAC | glycoproteins | CD5L, CFP, C8A, BST1, C7 |
| [ | Serum | colorectal, pancreatic, lung, prostate, and ovarian cancer | SPEG | N-glycosites | Pancancer candidate |
| [ | Serum | PCa vs. BPH | TiO2 | N-glycosites | APMAP, POSTN, CATD and LAMP2 |
Figure 3Advantages and disadvantages for each sample type.
Figure 4This figure shows the correlation between the alteration of tissue architecture and the increase of serum levels of PSA in PCa.
Main differentially abundant glycoforms of PSA found increased in PCa. * indicates non-MS-based workflows. Plain text = discovery level; bold character = validation level. Bead capture = PSA immunopurification by anti-PSA microbeads.
| Ref. | Sample | Sample Groups | Workflow | PSA Glycoforms | Depiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Serum | Non-PCa = 176 and PCa = 138 | Bead-capture * |
|
|
| [ | Serum | BPH= 29 and low-risk PCa = 7, intermediate risk PCa = 21, high-risk PCa = 22 | Bead-capture and lectin chromatography * | α2,3-sialic acid-linked (in high risk PCa) |
|
| [ | Urine | BPH = 43 and PCa = 20 | Bead-capture | H5N4S2F1 and H6N3S1 glycoforms |
|
| [ | Serum | PCA = 15 and BPH = 15 | Bead-capture | di/trisialylated (GalNAcβ1-4GlcNAc)-containing structures |
|