| Literature DB >> 34069253 |
Zi-Yi Zhang1, Jia-Yin Guan1, Yu-Rou Cao1, Xin-Yi Dai1, Kenneth B Storey2, Dan-Na Yu1,3, Jia-Yong Zhang1,3.
Abstract
We determined the mitochondrial gene sequence of Monochamus alternatus and three other mitogenomes of Lamiinae (Insect: Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) belonging to three genera (Aulaconotus, Apriona and Paraglenea) to enrich the mitochondrial genome database of Lamiinae and further explore the phylogenetic relationships within the subfamily. Phylogenetic trees of the Lamiinae were built using the Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods and the monophyly of Monochamus, Anoplophora, and Batocera genera was supported. Anoplophora chinensis, An. glabripennis and Aristobia reticulator were closely related, suggesting they may also be potential vectors for the transmission of the pine wood pathogenic nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) in addition to M. alternatus, a well-known vector of pine wilt disease. There is a special symbiotic relationship between M. alternatus and Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. As the native sympatric sibling species of B. xylophilus, B. mucronatus also has a specific relationship that is often overlooked. The analysis of mitochondrial gene expression aimed to explore the effect of B. mucronatus on the energy metabolism of the respiratory chain of M. alternatus adults. Using RT-qPCR, we determined and analyzed the expression of eight mitochondrial protein-coding genes (COI, COII, COIII, ND1, ND4, ND5, ATP6, and Cty b) between M. alternatus infected by B. mucronatus and M. alternatus without the nematode. Expression of all the eight mitochondrial genes were up-regulated, particularly the ND4 and ND5 gene, which were up-regulated by 4-5-fold (p < 0.01). Since longicorn beetles have immune responses to nematodes, we believe that their relationship should not be viewed as symbiotic, but classed as parasitic.Entities:
Keywords: Bursaphelenchus mucronatus; Lamiinae; Monochamus alternatus; mitochondrial gene expression; mitochondrial genome; phylogeny
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069253 PMCID: PMC8157225 DOI: 10.3390/insects12050453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Species sample information used in the phylogenetic tree construction in this study.
| Subamily | Genus | Species | GenBank No. | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamiinae |
|
| MT547196 | Liao (2020) |
|
| MW858152 |
| ||
|
| JX987292 | Wang (2012) | ||
|
| MW067124 | Wu (2020) | ||
|
|
| KT726932 | Li (2015) | |
|
| DQ768215 | An (2006) | ||
|
|
| MK423971 | Behere (2019) | |
|
|
| FJ424074 | Kim (2009) | |
|
|
| MN356095 | Dai (2020) | |
|
|
| MK863507 | Wang (2019) | |
|
|
| JN986793 | Wang (2011) | |
|
| MF521888 | Liu (2017) | ||
|
|
| KX184801 | Que (2016) | |
|
| MW858151 |
| ||
|
|
| KY292221 | Yang (2016) | |
|
|
| MW858148 |
| |
|
|
| KY796053 | Yang (2017) | |
| MH836614 | Crampton-Platt (2015) | |||
| MH789721 | Crampton-Platt (2015) | |||
|
|
| MN044086 | Wang (2019) | |
|
|
| MK863509 | Wang (2019) | |
|
|
| MK863511 | Wang (2019) | |
|
|
| KY796054 | Yang (2017) | |
|
| MT740324 | Dong (2020) | ||
|
| MK863510 | Wang (2019) | ||
|
|
| MW067123 | Chen (2020) | |
|
|
| MN610562 | Nie (2021) | |
| MH789720 | Crampton-Platt (2015) | |||
| MH789723 | Crampton-Platt (2015) | |||
|
|
| KY773692 | Yang (2017) | |
|
|
| MW858150 |
| |
|
|
| GU176345 | Song (2010) | |
|
|
| MF383367 | Tang (2017) |
The partition schemes and best-fitting models selected.
| Nucleotide Sequence Alignments | ||
|---|---|---|
| Subset | Subset Partitions | Best Model |
| Partition 1 | GTR + I + G | |
| Partition 2 | TVM + I + G | |
| Partition 3 | TIM + G | |
| Partition 4 | GTR + I + G | |
| Partition 5 | HKY + G | |
| Partition 6 | TVM + I + G | |
| Partition 7 | GTR + I + G | |
| Partition 8 | HKY + G | |
| Partition 9 | TVM + I + G | |
| Partition 10 | TRN + G | |
| Partition 11 | HKY + G | |
Primer sequences of eight mitochondrial protein-coding genes and β-actin gene designed for RT-qPCR experiment in this study.
| Gene | Forward Primer | Forward Primer |
|---|---|---|
|
| CTCAACCCCAAGGCTAACC | CACCATCTCCAGAGTCCAAT |
|
| CTC(T)TTACCTCCTTCTTTAACTC | CAACTGATGAACCTCTATGAG |
|
| GATGCAACTCCTGGACGAT | ATCTATGATTGGCACCACAA |
|
| AGAGCCTTATCTCCTAGAATTG | GCTCAAGTTACTGTTAATCCTG |
|
| ATTATC(T)GCAAATCCACCTCT | TAGCAGAAACTAATCGTACTCC |
|
| GAAGGAGGAGCAGCCATA | CTTCAGGTTTATTTTGTTTAGC |
|
| TAGTAAAGCAACATCCCCA | TATTAGGGTGAGATGGTTTAG |
|
| TTAGTACCTCAAGGAACTCC | GATAATCGAACTGCCAATGT |
|
| ATCATTCTGAGGAGCAACTG | TGAAAGGTAAAAAATCGTGT |
Figure 1Complete mitochondrial genome structures of Au. atronotatus, Ap. germari, P. fortune and M. alternatus. Genes encoded by the L-strand are underlined whereas those without underline are encoded on the H-strand. Different colored boxes represent different genes.
Base composition of four Lamiinae mitochondrial genomes.
| Species | A + T (%) | AT-Skew | GC-Skew | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mito | PCGs | rRNAs | tRNAs | Mito | PCGs | rRNAs | tRNAs | Mito | PCGs | rRNAs | tRNAs | |
|
| 74.2 | 73.5 | 76.8 | 78.5 | 0.019 | −0.15 | −0.052 | 0.029 | −0.0222 | −0.034 | 0.401 | 0.133 |
|
| 76.8 | 76.3 | 77.7 | 77.2 | 0.013 | −0.151 | −0.028 | 0.036 | −0.0208 | −0.002 | 0.409 | 0.154 |
|
| 74.3 | 73 | 75.7 | 76 | 0.038 | −0.152 | −0.062 | 0.031 | −0.287 | −0.014 | 0.472 | 0.116 |
|
| 78.4 | 77.7 | 82.1 | 79.9 | 0.006 | −0.152 | −0.023 | 0.034 | −0.153 | 0.026 | 0.342 | 0.112 |
Figure 2The relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of the 13 protein-coding genes. Codon families are provided on the x-axis along with the different combinations of synonymous codons that code for that amino acid. RSCU is defined on the Y axis.
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree of the relationships among 33 species of longicorn beetles based on the nucleotide dataset of the 13 mitochondrial PCGs. S. velatus and N. xanthographus was used as the outgroup. The numbers above branches specify posterior probabilities as determined from BI (left) and bootstrap percentages from ML (right). The GenBank accession numbers of all species are shown in the figure. The species in bold are sequenced in this study, and the species with colored frame are the species with different topology between ML and BI trees.
Figure 4The expression of eight protein-coding genes from M. alternatus carrying B. mucronatus or not. The x-axis shows gene names, and the y-axis shows relative gene expression. Black columns show controls, standardized to 1.0; gray columns show the corresponding experimental group (carrying B. mucronatus). Asterisks indicate significantly different expression: *, p < 0.05); **, p < 0.01.