| Literature DB >> 34069074 |
Martin Kocher1,2,3, Christiane Jockwitz4, Philipp Lohmann1,2,3, Gabriele Stoffels1, Christian Filss1, Felix M Mottaghy5,6, Maximilian I Ruge2,3, Carolin Weiss Lucas3,7, Roland Goldbrunner3,7, Nadim J Shah1,8,9, Gereon R Fink3,10,11, Norbert Galldiks3,10,11, Karl-Josef Langen1,5, Svenja Caspers4,12.
Abstract
Cognitive deficits are common in glioma patients following multimodality therapy, but the relative impact of different types and locations of treatment-related brain damage and recurrent tumors on cognition is not well understood. In 121 WHO Grade III/IV glioma patients, structural MRI, O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine FET-PET, and neuropsychological testing were performed at a median interval of 14 months (range, 1-214 months) after therapy initiation. Resection cavities, T1-enhancing lesions, T2/FLAIR hyperintensities, and FET-PET positive tumor sites were semi-automatically segmented and elastically registered to a normative, resting state (RS) fMRI-based functional cortical network atlas and to the JHU atlas of white matter (WM) tracts, and their influence on cognitive test scores relative to a cohort of matched healthy subjects was assessed. T2/FLAIR hyperintensities presumably caused by radiation therapy covered more extensive brain areas than the other lesion types and significantly impaired cognitive performance in many domains when affecting left-hemispheric RS-nodes and WM-tracts as opposed to brain tissue damage caused by resection or recurrent tumors. Verbal episodic memory proved to be especially vulnerable to T2/FLAIR abnormalities affecting the nodes and tracts of the left temporal lobe. In order to improve radiotherapy planning, publicly available brain atlases, in conjunction with elastic registration techniques, should be used, similar to neuronavigation in neurosurgery.Entities:
Keywords: brain networks; cognitive testing; glioma; positron emission tomography; radiotherapy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069074 PMCID: PMC8156090 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1(A): Image processing and analysis. Contrast enhancing tumors (T), T2/FLAIR hyperintensities (F), and FET-PET positive tumors (P) were segmented semi-automatically; resection cavities (Cv) were manually outlined. After elastic registration to the MNI-152 space, the partial volumetric overlap of all lesions with 2 × 50 functional resting-state atlas regions (organized into seven networks) and 2 × 24 atlas-based white matter tracts was computed. (B): Atlas-based functional cortical nodes and white matter tracts impacting episodic memory (immediate recall) when affected by T2/FLAIR hyperintensities in n = 121 WHO Grade III/IV glioma patients. The functional nodes belong to different resting-state networks. T1CE: T1-weighted MR image with contrast enhancement, T2: T2-weighted SPACE MR image, PET: O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron-emission tomography; Vis: visual network, SM: somato-motor network, dAtt: dorsal attention network, vAtt: ventral attention network, Limb: limbic network, FPC: fronto-parietal control network, DMN: default mode network, SupLFasc: superior longitudinal fascicle, CorRad: corona radiata, CorpCall: corpus callosum, GyrCing: cingulate gyrus, SagStrat: sagittal stratum, rpIntCaps: retrolenticular part of the internal capsule.
Cognitive test scores in Grade III/IV glioma patients.
| Cognitive Function Domain/Test | Healthy Subjects | WHO Grade III/IV Glioma Patients ( | Patients Affected by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attention, processing speed [ | 30.9 (12.1) | 47.3 (33.9) *** | 39 (32%) |
| Processing speed/executive function | 68.2 (40.1) | 117.6 (80.2) *** | 34 (28%) |
| Executive function [ | 2.25 (0.72) | 2.56 (0.94) ** | 19 (16%) |
| Language, word fluency [ | 26.8 (4.4) | 20.2 (7.7) *** | 57 (47%) |
| Language processing [ | 3.6 (0.6) | 3.3 (1.1) n.s. | 21 (17%) |
| Verbal working memory [ | 8.3 (2.3) | 7.4 (2.3) ** | 12 (10%) |
| Verbal working memory [ | 8.0 (2.3) | 6.5 (2.5) *** | 20 (17%) |
| Visual working memory [ | 7.4 (1.9) | 6.6 (2.3) * | 27 (22%) |
| Visual working memory [ | 6.0 (2.0) | 4.8 (2.2) *** | 28 (23%) |
| Verbal episodic memory [ | 14.1 (2.6) | 11.7 (3.7) *** | 34 (28%) |
| Verbal episodic memory [ | 5.4 (2.4) | 4.5 (2.8) * | 22 (18%) |
Average (standard deviation) cognitive test scores in n = 121 WHO Grade III/IV glioma patients compared with a cohort of n = 121 healthy subjects matched for age, gender, and educational status. The ratio TMT-B/TMT-A was used as an additional measure for executive functioning. In TMT-A and TMT-B, lower scores correspond to better performance, while in all other tests, higher scores indicate better performance. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, two-sided Mann–Whitney U-test. a: below (mean—1.5 × standard deviation) that of healthy subjects.
Figure 2Correlation analysis for test scores of verbal episodic memory in WHO Grade III/IV glioma patients (n = 121, red circles) with respect to age (a), education level (b), and the affection of selected atlas-derived tracts (left superior longitudinal fasciculus, (c) or resting-state functional nodes (left temporal DMN node, (d). τ: Kendall-tau-b correlation coefficient. ρ: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. A small jitter was added to the volumetric overlap in order to prevent overplotting. In addition, the calculated line for linear regression is depicted in blue. For reference, the distribution of scores in healthy subjects is shown as a boxplot (green). Patients were assumed to be affected by clinically relevant cognitive deficits if they fell below a threshold (defined as 1.5 standard deviations below the mean) based on the healthy subjects (green dashed line).
Figure 3Heatmap of the correlation analysis between the volumetric overlap of four types of lesions with the functional cortical areas of an atlas-based parcellation [17] and the scores of 10 cognitive tests in n = 121 WHO Grade III/IV glioma patients. The functional nodes are ordered by location in the left or right hemisphere and the essential resting-state networks. p-values are given for the Kendall-tau-b rank correlations. T2/FLAIR: lesions semi-automatically segmented in T2-weighted and FLAIR MR images; T2/FLAIR PET (-): p-values for a group of n = 63 patients with an absence of FET-PET-positive tumor growth; Cavity: manually segmented resection cavity; T1-CE: semi-automatically segmented contrast-enhancing regions in T1-weighted MR images; FET-PET: semi-automatically segmented FET-PET-positive lesions; DMN: default mode network; PCC: posterior cingulate gyrus; TMT-a (A): trail-making—Test A (attention); TMT-b (E): trail-making—Test B (executive functions); SupM (L): supermarket test (language); NumT (L): number transcoding (language); DSf (VM): digit span forward (verbal working memory); DSb (VM): digit span backward (verbal working memory); CBTf (vM): Corsi block tapping forward (visual working memory); CBTb (vM): Corsi block tapping backwards (visual working memory); WLi (eM): word list immediate recall (verbal episodic memory); WLd (eM): word list delayed recall (verbal episodic memory). No significant correlations were observed for the TMT-b/TMT-a ratio.
Figure 4Heatmap of the correlation analysis between the volumetric overlap of four types of lesions with atlas-based white matter tracts [19] and the scores of 10 cognitive tests in n = 121 WHO Grade III/IV glioma patients. The tracts are ordered by location in the left and right hemispheres or midline structures. p-values are given for the Kendall-tau-b rank correlations. T2/FLAIR: lesions semi-automatically segmented in T2-weighted and FLAIR MR images; T2/FLAIR PET (-): p-values for a group of n = 63 patients with an absence of FET-PET-positive tumor growth; Cavity: manually segmented resection cavity; T1-CE: semi-automatically segmented contrast-enhancing regions in T1-weighted MR images; FET-PET: semi-automatically segmented FET-PET-positive lesions; TMT-a (A): trail-making—Test A (attention), TMT-b (E): trail-making—Test B (executive function); SupM (L): supermarket test (language); NumT (L): number transcoding (language); DSf (VM): digit span forward (verbal working memory); DSb (VM): digit span backward (verbal working memory); CBTf (vM): Corsi block tapping forward (visual working memory); CBTb (vM): Corsi block tapping backwards (visual working memory); WLi (eM): word list immediate recall (verbal episodic memory); WLd (eM): word list delayed recall (verbal episodic memory). No significant correlations were observed for the TMT-b/TMT-a ratio.
Multiple logistic regression models for predicting cognitive deficits.
| Cognitive Function Domain/Model Variables | Proportion Affected | Sens | Spec | PPV | NPV | ACC | AUC (ROC) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Age + Edu + TotalVols | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.56 | n.s. |
| + T2/FLAIR N25 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.95 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.013 # |
|
| ||||||||
| Age + Edu + TotalVols | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.98 | 0.67 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.58 | n.s. |
| + T2/FLAIR N33 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.01 # |
|
| ||||||||
| Age + Edu + TotalVols | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.98 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.61 | n.s. |
| + T2/FLAIR T34 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.97 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.029 # |
|
| ||||||||
| Age + Edu + TotalVols | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.001 |
| + T2/FLAIR T34 | 0.32 | 0.51 | 0.91 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.005 |
|
| ||||||||
| Age + Edu + TotalVols | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.93 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.008 |
| + T2/FLAIR T34 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.004 |
Performance measures of logistic regression models for predicting the risk for clinically relevant cognitive decline from age, education, and total volume of segmented tissue changes or in combination with the affection of a representative functional cortical region or white matter tract by T2/FLAIR changes. N25: functional node 25 (ventral attention network, left frontal operculum); N33: functional node 33 (left limbic network, temporal pole); T34: left external capsule; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; ACC: accuracy; ROC: receiver–operator characteristic; AUC: area under curve; p: p-value for ROC analysis. #: models that were improved by the inclusion of a representative node/tract affected by T2/FLAIR changes.