Literature DB >> 24697967

When to use the Bonferroni correction.

Richard A Armstrong1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Bonferroni correction adjusts probability (p) values because of the increased risk of a type I error when making multiple statistical tests. The routine use of this test has been criticised as deleterious to sound statistical judgment, testing the wrong hypothesis, and reducing the chance of a type I error but at the expense of a type II error; yet it remains popular in ophthalmic research. The purpose of this article was to survey the use of the Bonferroni correction in research articles published in three optometric journals, viz. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, Optometry & Vision Science, and Clinical & Experimental Optometry, and to provide advice to authors contemplating multiple testing. RECENT
FINDINGS: Some authors ignored the problem of multiple testing while others used the method uncritically with no rationale or discussion. A variety of methods of correcting p values were employed, the Bonferroni method being the single most popular. Bonferroni was used in a variety of circumstances, most commonly to correct the experiment-wise error rate when using multiple 't' tests or as a post-hoc procedure to correct the family-wise error rate following analysis of variance (anova). Some studies quoted adjusted p values incorrectly or gave an erroneous rationale.
SUMMARY: Whether or not to use the Bonferroni correction depends on the circumstances of the study. It should not be used routinely and should be considered if: (1) a single test of the 'universal null hypothesis' (Ho ) that all tests are not significant is required, (2) it is imperative to avoid a type I error, and (3) a large number of tests are carried out without preplanned hypotheses.
© 2014 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2014 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bonferroni correction; Clinical & Experimental Optometry; Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics; Optometry & Vision Science; statistical guidelines

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24697967     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  432 in total

1.  Spiritual, religious, and existential concerns of cancer survivors in a secular country with focus on age, gender, and emotional challenges.

Authors:  N C Hvidt; T B Mikkelsen; A D Zwisler; J B Tofte; E Assing Hvidt
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Maternal single nucleotide polymorphisms in the fatty acid desaturase 1 and 2 coding regions modify the impact of prenatal supplementation with DHA on birth weight.

Authors:  Ines Gonzalez-Casanova; Peter Rzehak; Aryeh D Stein; Raquel Garcia Feregrino; Juan A Rivera Dommarco; Albino Barraza-Villarreal; Hans Demmelmair; Isabelle Romieu; Salvador Villalpando; Reynaldo Martorell; Berthold Koletzko; Usha Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Comparisons of IQ in Children With and Without Cochlear Implants: Longitudinal Findings and Associations With Language.

Authors:  Ivette Cejas; Christine M Mitchell; Michael Hoffman; Alexandra L Quittner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Staging biomarkers in preclinical autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease by estimated years to symptom onset.

Authors:  Guoqiao Wang; Dean Coble; Eric M McDade; Jason Hassenstab; Anne M Fagan; Tammie L S Benzinger; Randall J Bateman; John C Morris; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Parent-Youth Divergence (and Convergence) in Reports of Youth Internalizing Problems in Psychiatric Inpatient Care.

Authors:  Bridget A Makol; Andres De Los Reyes; Rick S Ostrander; Elizabeth K Reynolds
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2019-10

6.  Malassezia Yeast and Cytokine Gene Polymorphism in Atopic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Charu Jain; Shukla Das; V G Ramachandran; Rumpa Saha; S N Bhattacharya; Sajad Dar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Parent and child emotion and distress responses associated with parental accommodation of child anxiety symptoms.

Authors:  Erin E O'Connor; Lindsay E Holly; Lydia L Chevalier; Donna B Pincus; David A Langer
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2020-02-15

8.  Reward elicits cognitive control over emotional distraction: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Amy T Walsh; David Carmel; Gina M Grimshaw
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  The p Factor Consistently Predicts Long-Term Psychiatric and Functional Outcomes in Anxiety-Disordered Youth.

Authors:  Matti Cervin; Lesley A Norris; Golda Ginsburg; Elizabeth A Gosch; Scott N Compton; John Piacentini; Anne Marie Albano; Dara Sakolsky; Boris Birmaher; Courtney Keeton; Eric A Storch; Philip C Kendall
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 8.829

10.  Association of Childhood Lead Exposure With MRI Measurements of Structural Brain Integrity in Midlife.

Authors:  Aaron Reuben; Maxwell L Elliott; Wickliffe C Abraham; Jonathan Broadbent; Renate M Houts; David Ireland; Annchen R Knodt; Richie Poulton; Sandhya Ramrakha; Ahmad R Hariri; Avshalom Caspi; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.