| Literature DB >> 34068270 |
Salvatore Cutugno1, Tommaso Ingrassia1, Vincenzo Nigrelli1, Salvatore Pasta1.
Abstract
The left ventricle (LV) constantly changes its shape and function as a response to pathological conditions, and this process is known as remodeling. In the presence of aortic stenosis (AS), the degenerative process is not limited to the aortic valve but also involves the remodeling of LV. Statistical shape analysis (SSA) offers a powerful tool for the visualization and quantification of the geometrical and functional patterns of any anatomic changes. In this paper, a SSA method was developed to determine shape descriptors of the LV under different degrees of AS and thus to shed light on the mechanistic link between shape and function. A total of n=86 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of valvulopathy were segmented to obtain the LV surface and then were automatically aligned to a reference template by rigid registrations and transformations. Shape modes of the anatomical LV variation induced by the degree of AS were assessed by principal component analysis (PCA). The first shape mode represented nearly 50% of the total variance of LV shape in our patient population and was mainly associated to a spherical LV geometry. At Pearson's analysis, the first shape mode was positively correlated to both the end-diastolic volume (p<0.01, R=0.814) and end-systolic volume (p<0.01, and R=0.922), suggesting LV impairment in patients with severe AS. A predictive model built with PCA-related shape modes achieved better performance in stratifying the occurrence of adverse events with respect to a baseline model using clinical demographic data as risk predictors. This study demonstrated the potential of SSA approaches to detect the association of complex 3D shape features with functional LV parameters.Entities:
Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; left ventricle; statistical shape analysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34068270 PMCID: PMC8153107 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8050066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) ISSN: 2306-5354
Demographic and clinical data of study population divided by groups.
| No Stenosis | Moderate Stenosis | Severe Stenosis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) |
|
|
| |
| BSA ( |
|
|
|
|
| BMI ( |
|
|
|
|
| Heart Rate (bpm) |
|
|
|
|
| SP (mmHg) |
|
|
|
|
| DP (mmHg) |
|
|
|
|
| MAP (mmHg) |
|
|
|
|
| SV (ml) |
|
|
|
|
| CO (ml/min) |
|
|
|
|
| TA flow (m/s) |
|
|
| <0.001 * |
| LVMI ( |
|
|
|
|
| EDV (ml) |
|
|
|
|
| ESV (ml) |
|
|
|
|
| EF (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <0.001 * | |
| Sample size | 30 | 29 | 27 |
Note: BSA = body surface area; BMI = body mass index; SP = Systolic Pressure; DP = Diastolic Pressure; MAP = mean arterial pressure; SV = stroke volume; CO = cardiac output; TA flow = transaortic flow; LVMI = left ventricular mass index; EDV = end-diastolic volume; ESV = end-systolic volume; EF = ejection fraction; ΔP = transvalvulare pressure gradient; * significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Scree plot of PCA done for all study groups for (A) end-diastolic and (B) end-systolic cardiac phases.
Figure 2Mode 1 shape variation between and for both moderate and severe AS groups at ED configuration.
Figure 3First six shape modes for severe AS study group at ED configuration.
Figure 4Correlation of Mode 1 with (A) end-systolic volume and (B) end-diastolic volume for moderate stenosis of LV.
Logistic regression analysis of the shape modes retained upon 90% of shape variability.
| Parameter | Coefficient | Standard Error | SC | OR | OR 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | −9.507 | 2.278 | ||||
| Age | 0.130 | 0.330 | 0.356 | 0.799 | 0.260 | 2.264 |
| Sex | 2.180 | 1.031 | 0.651 | 1.039 | 0.986 | 1.082 |
| Mode 1 * | 0.024 | 0.002 | 2.65 | 1.024 | 1.019 | 1.035 |
| Mode 2 * | −0.012 | 0.003 | −0.589 | 1.011 | 0.984 | 0.992 |
| Mode 3 | −0.002 | 0.004 | −0.091 | 1.038 | 1.035 | 1.038 |
| Mode 4 * | 0.056 | 0.002 | 0.228 | 1.007 | 1.001 | 1.013 |
| Mode 5 | 0.019 | 0.007 | 0.257 | 1.021 | 1.006 | 1.034 |
| Mode 6 * | −0.012 | 0.008 | −0.145 | 0.978 | 0.961 | 1.003 |
| Mode 7 | −0.019 | 0.007 | −0.247 | 1.020 | 1.066 | 1.034 |
| Mode 8 | −0.031 | 0.005 | −0.913 | 1.010 | 1.000 | 1.030 |
Note: SC = Standardized coefficient; OR = Odd ratio; * indicate p < 0.05.
Figure 5ROC curves for predicting the risk of valvular repair using a model based on principal shape modes as compared to the baseline model based on clinical demographic data.