Literature DB >> 28103561

Statistical shape modeling of the left ventricle: myocardial infarct classification challenge.

Avan Suinesiaputra, Pierre Ablin, Xenia Alba, Martino Alessandrini, Jack Allen, Wenjia Bai, Serkan Cimen, Peter Claes, Brett R Cowan, Jan D'hooge, Nicolas Duchateau, Jan Ehrhardt, Alejandro F Frangi, Ali Gooya, Vicente Grau, Karim Lekadir, Allen Lu, Anirban Mukhopadhyay, Ilkay Oksuz, Nripesh Parajali, Xavier Pennec, Marco Pereanez, Catarina Pinto, Paolo Piras, Marc-Michel Rohe, Daniel Rueckert, Dennis Saring, Maxime Sermesant, Kaleem Siddiqi, Mahdi Tabassian, Luciano Teresi, Sotirios A Tsaftaris, Matthias Wilms, Alistair A Young, Xingyu Zhang, Pau Medrano-Gracia.   

Abstract

Statistical shape modeling is a powerful tool for visualizing and quantifying geometric and functional patterns of the heart. After myocardial infarction (MI), the left ventricle typically remodels in response to physiological challenges. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to describe statistical shape changes. Which method best characterizes left ventricular remodeling after MI is an open research question. A better descriptor of remodeling is expected to provide a more accurate evaluation of disease status in MI patients. We therefore designed a challenge to test shape characterization in MI given a set of three-dimensional left ventricular surface points. The training set comprised 100 MI patients, and 100 asymptomatic volunteers (AV). The challenge was initiated in 2015 at the Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart workshop, in conjunction with the MICCAI conference. The training set with labels was provided to participants, who were asked to submit the likelihood of MI from a different (validation) set of 200 cases (100 AV and 100 MI). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used as the outcome measures. The goals of this challenge were to (1) establish a common dataset for evaluating statistical shape modeling algorithms in MI, and (2) test whether statistical shape modeling provides additional information characterizing MI patients over standard clinical measures. Eleven groups with a wide variety of classification and feature extraction approaches participated in this challenge. All methods achieved excellent classification results with accuracy ranges from 0.83 to 0.98. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were all above 0.90. Four methods showed significantly higher performance than standard clinical measures. The dataset and software for evaluation are available from the Cardiac Atlas Project website1.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28103561      PMCID: PMC5857476          DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2652449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  49 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains.

Authors:  Iñaki Inza; Pedro Larrañaga; Rosa Blanco; Antonio J Cerrolaza
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Cardiovascular effects of aging. Interrelationships of aortic, left ventricular, and left atrial function.

Authors:  K Kallaras; E A Sparks; D P Schuster; K Osei; C F Wooley; H Boudoulas
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Rationale and design for the Defibrillators to Reduce Risk by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation (DETERMINE) trial.

Authors:  Alan H Kadish; David Bello; J Paul Finn; Robert O Bonow; Andi Schaechter; Haris Subacius; Christine Albert; James P Daubert; Carissa G Fonseca; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H D White; R M Norris; M A Brown; P W Brandt; R M Whitlock; C J Wild
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  E Wu; J T Ortiz; P Tejedor; D C Lee; C Bucciarelli-Ducci; P Kansal; J C Carr; T A Holly; D Lloyd-Jones; F J Klocke; R O Bonow
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Cardiac remodeling--concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling.

Authors:  J N Cohn; R Ferrari; N Sharpe
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Relation of left ventricular sphericity to 10-year survival after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Selwyn P Wong; John K French; Anna-Maria Lydon; Samuel O M Manda; Wanzhen Gao; Noel G Ashton; Harvey D White
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Imaging in population science: cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank - rationale, challenges and approaches.

Authors:  Steffen E Petersen; Paul M Matthews; Fabian Bamberg; David A Bluemke; Jane M Francis; Matthias G Friedrich; Paul Leeson; Eike Nagel; Sven Plein; Frank E Rademakers; Alistair A Young; Steve Garratt; Tim Peakman; Jonathan Sellors; Rory Collins; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  15 in total

1.  Automatic estimation of aortic and mitral valve displacements in dynamic CTA with 4D graph-cuts.

Authors:  Juan E Ortuño; Gonzalo Vegas-Sánchez-Ferrero; Juan J Gómez-Valverde; Marcus Y Chen; Andrés Santos; Elliot R McVeigh; María J Ledesma-Carbayo
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Parametric-based feature selection via spherical harmonic coefficients for the left ventricle myocardial infarction screening.

Authors:  Gelareh Valizadeh; Farshid Babapour Mofrad; Ahmad Shalbaf
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Validation of a deep-learning semantic segmentation approach to fully automate MRI-based left-ventricular deformation analysis in cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Julia Karr; Michael Cohen; Samuel A McQuiston; Teja Poorsala; Christopher Malozzi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A deep-learning semantic segmentation approach to fully automated MRI-based left-ventricular deformation analysis in cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  By Julia Kar; Michael V Cohen; Samuel P McQuiston; Christopher M Malozzi
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Statistical shape analysis of the left atrial appendage predicts stroke in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Erik T Bieging; Alan Morris; Lowell Chang; Lilas Dagher; Nassir F Marrouche; Joshua Cates
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Morphologically normalized left ventricular motion indicators from MRI feature tracking characterize myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Paolo Piras; Luciano Teresi; Paolo Emilio Puddu; Concetta Torromeo; Alistair A Young; Avan Suinesiaputra; Pau Medrano-Gracia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Combining statistical shape modeling, CFD, and meta-modeling to approximate the patient-specific pressure-drop across the aortic valve in real-time.

Authors:  M J M M Hoeijmakers; I Waechter-Stehle; J Weese; F N Van de Vosse
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  On the Left Ventricular Remodeling of Patients with Stenotic Aortic Valve: A Statistical Shape Analysis.

Authors:  Salvatore Cutugno; Tommaso Ingrassia; Vincenzo Nigrelli; Salvatore Pasta
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13

9.  The impact of shape uncertainty on aortic-valve pressure-drop computations.

Authors:  M J M M Hoeijmakers; W Huberts; M C M Rutten; F N van de Vosse
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.648

10.  Radiomics Signatures of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Cardiac MRI: Results From the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Irem Cetin; Zahra Raisi-Estabragh; Steffen E Petersen; Sandy Napel; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer; Miguel A Gonzalez Ballester; Oscar Camara; Karim Lekadir
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.