| Literature DB >> 34066925 |
Hanadi Sawalha1,2, Rambod Abiri3, Ruzana Sanusi1,3, Noor Azmi Shaharuddin2,4, Aida Atiqah Mohd Noor1,2, Nor Aini Ab Shukor1,3, Hazandy Abdul-Hamid1,3, Siti Aqlima Ahmad1,2.
Abstract
Nanotechnology is a promising tool that has opened the doors of improvement to the quality of human's lives through its potential in numerous technological aspects. Green chemistry of nanoscale materials (1-100 nm) is as an effective and sustainable strategy to manufacture homogeneous nanoparticles (NPs) with unique properties, thus making the synthesis of green NPs, especially metal nanoparticles (MNPs), the scientist's core theme. Researchers have tested different organisms to manufacture MNPs and the results of experiments confirmed that plants tend to be the ideal candidate amongst all entities and are suitable to synthesize a wide variety of MNPs. Natural and cultivated Eucalyptus forests are among woody plants used for landscape beautification and as forest products. The present review has been written to reflect the efficacious role of Eucalyptus in the synthesis of MNPs. To better understand this, the route of extracting MNPs from plants, in general, and Eucalyptus, in particular, are discussed. Furthermore, the crucial factors influencing the process of MNP synthesis from Eucalyptus as well as their characterization and recent applications are highlighted. Information gathered in this review is useful to build a basis for new prospective research ideas on how to exploit this woody species in the production of MNPs. Nevertheless, there is a necessity to feed the scientific field with further investigations on wider applications of Eucalyptus-derived MNPs.Entities:
Keywords: Eucalyptus; biosynthesis; metal nanoparticles; nanoparticles; nanotechnology
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066925 PMCID: PMC8148548 DOI: 10.3390/plants10050929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1A simplified interpretation of the bottom-up and top-down ways. For the biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles (MNPs), the bottom-up method is used where small atoms and molecules are combined into clusters and then to nanoscale particles. Contrariwise, in the top-down method, the nanoparticles (NPs) are created from the bulk materials.
Figure 2The green synthesis method using several unicellular (bacteria, algae) and multicellular (plants, fungi) biological agents—a system in which these agents are utilized to generate nanostructures of metals in one step.
Figure 3Chemical reduction and stabilization of MNPs. Reduction of the metal salt solution is done by the presence of secondary metabolites in plant extracts such as (phenols, polyphenols, and flavonoids) to maintain zero-valent metals. Then, MNPs with various shapes and sizes are yielded, followed by coating and stabilizing with capping agents (secondary metabolites).
Figure 4Photos of (a) Eucalyptus cladocalyx (leaf), (b) Eucalyptus pilularis (bark), (c) Eucalyptus cladocalyx (whole tree). Photos are taken from the “Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria—Melbourne Gardens”.
Eucalyptus-mediated synthesis of metallic NPs.
| NP | Plant Part | Characterization Tools | NP Size (nm) | NP Shape | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | leaf | UV, FTIR, SEM, TEM, XRD, | 10–30 | spherical | [ |
| leaf | UV, XRD, SEM, TEM, EDS | 14.5 | monocyclic, cubic | [ | |
| bark | TEM | 468.7 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | UV, SEM, EDX | 12.3–14.43 | spherical | [ | |
| bark | UV, XRD, FESEM, HRTEM, TEM, FTIR | 25 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | UV, FETEM, XRD, FTIR | 4–60 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | UV, XRD | 60 | cubic | [ | |
| leaf | UV, XRD, SEM, TEM | 50 | cubic | [ | |
| leaf | UV, SEM, EDX, FTIR | 21 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | UV, FTIR, TEM, SEM | 8–15 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | SEM | 17.51 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | UV, SEM, DLS, NTA, EDS | 12 | spherical | [ | |
| wood | UV, XRD, TEM, FTIR, FESEM, EDAX | 25–30 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | UV, XRD, SEM, EDS, TEM | 14.5 | spherical, agglomerated | [ | |
| Au | bark | UV, TEM, DLS | ~20 | triangular, hexagonal, spherical | [ |
| leaf | UV, TEM, FTIR | 1.25–17.5 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | TEM | 12.8 ± 6.3 | spherical | [ | |
| Fe | leaf | UV, homemade device | 0.2–2 | spherical | [ |
| leaf | SEM, EDS, FTIR, XRD | 20–80 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | XRD, FTIR, XPS, GCMS | ~95 | spherical | [ | |
| leaf | SEM, TEM, XRD | 70 ± 10 | spherical | [ | |
| Calcined-Fe/Pd | leaf | TEM, EDS, XRD, XPS | 30–60 | spherical | [ |
| Bimetallic Fe/Ni | Leaf | FTIR, TG, SEM, EDS, XRD, XPS | 20–50 | spherical and irregular | [ |
Figure 5Schematic mechanism of synthesis MNPs from Eucalyptus. Starting from the collection of plant parts, then going through several steps, and ending with filtration to reach the extraction. After that, the extract is used to reach the targeted MNPs after mixing it with the metal ion solution to observe the changed color, which indicates the procedure’s success.
Figure 6The most-used characterisation techniques (TEM, SEM, UV-vis, XRD, and FTIR) to investigate different features (size, shape, diameter) of MNPs derived from Eucalyptus.