| Literature DB >> 34066538 |
Daniela Fenoglio1,2, Liliana Belgioia3,4, Alessia Parodi2, Francesco Missale5,6, Almalina Bacigalupo3,4, Alison Tarke1, Fabiola Incandela7, Simone Negrini1,8, Stefania Vecchio9, Tiziana Altosole1, Sara Vlah1, Giuseppina Astone1, Francesca Costabile1, Alessandro Ascoli6,10, Francesca Ferrera1, Guido Schenone6, Raffaele De Palma8,11, Alessio Signori12, Giorgio Peretti6,10, Renzo Corvò3,4, Gilberto Filaci1,2.
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a poor clinical outcome despite the presence of a rich CD8+ T cell tumor infiltrate in the majority of patients. This may be due to alterations of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Here, we performed a characterization of HNSCC infiltrating CD8+ T cells in a cohort of 30 patients. The results showed that differential intratumoral frequency of CD8+CD28+ T cells, CD8+CD28- T cells, and CD8+CD28-CD127-CD39+ Treg distinguished between HNSCC patients who did or did not respond to treatment. Moreover, high PD1 expression identified a CD8+CD28- T cell subpopulation, phenotypically/functionally corresponding to CD8+CD28-CD127-CD39+ Treg, which showed a high expression of markers of exhaustion. This observation suggests that development of exhaustion and acquisition of regulatory properties may configure the late differentiation stage for intratumoral effector T cells, a phenomenon we define as effector-to-regulatory T cell transition.Entities:
Keywords: CD8+ T lymphocytes; exhaustion; head-neck cancer; regulatory T cells
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066538 PMCID: PMC8124419 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Patient characteristics.
| Demographic and Clinical Variables | Overall ( |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Mean (SD) | 65.1 (11.6) |
| Median (Min, Max) | 65.0 (35.0, 83.0) |
|
| |
| F | 4 (20.0%) |
| M | 16 (80.0%) |
|
| |
| No | 5 (25.0%) |
| Yes | 15 (75.0%) |
|
| |
| No | 13 (65.0%) |
| Yes | 7 (35.0%) |
|
| |
| Negative | 10 (50.0%) |
| Positive | 10 (50.0%) |
|
| |
| Oropharynx | 20 (100.0%) |
|
| |
| T1 | 2 (10.0%) |
| T2 | 6 (30.0%) |
| T4 | 12 (60.0%) |
|
| |
| N0 | 2 (10.0%) |
| N1 | 3 (15.0%) |
| N2 | 14 (70.0%) |
| N3 | 1 (5.0%) |
| II | 2 (10.0%) |
| III | 2 (10.0%) |
| IV | 16 (80.0%) |
|
| |
| RT b alone | 3 (15.0%) |
| RT + CHT c | 16 (80.0%) |
| Surgery | 1 (5.0%) |
|
| |
| Not responder (Group 1) | 7 (35.0%) |
| Responder (Group 2) | 13 (65.0%) |
an: Number; b RT: radiotherapy; c CHT: chemotherapy.
Percent frequencies of HNSCC infiltrating CD3+ and CD4+ T cell subsets in Group 1 and Group 2.
| T Cell Subsets | Group 1 | Group 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | Median | IQR | ||
| CD3+/total cells | 8 | 7–48 | 27 | 9–36.1 | 0.38 |
| CD4+/CD3+ | 61 | 56–71 | 70 | 54–80 | 0.94 |
| Naïve CD4+ | 3.3 | 0.5–5.2 | 0.8 | 0.3–1.1 | 0.19 |
| CM CD4+ | 8.5 | 1.9–17 | 4.4 | 2–7.6 | 0.69 |
| EM CD4+ | 82 | 72–83 | 83 | 78–89 | 0.50 |
| TEM CD4+ | 7 | 1.3–13 | 8 | 4–13 | 0.63 |
| Naïve CD4+PD1+ | 4.5 | 1.8–10 | 1.9 | 0.8–4 | 0.25 |
| CM CD4+PD1+ | 9 | 5.2–20 | 5 | 3.8–12 | 0.41 |
| EM CD4+PD1+ | 64 | 58–75 | 74 | 56–81 | 0.75 |
| TEM CD4+PD1+ | 8.5 | 3.6–24 | 14 | 6–18 | 0.69 |
| CD4+CD25hiFoxP3+ (CD4+ Treg) | 22 | 11.5–25 | 16.4 | 11.7–20.4 | 0.69 |
| CD4+CD25hiFoxP3+/CD3+ | 14.5 | 9.9–15.6 | 8.8 | 7.9–15.4 | 0.46 |
| CD4+PD1+ Treg | 47 | 23–53 | 43 | 21–48 | 0.59 |
| CD4+CD152+ Treg | 59 | 34–72 | 62 | 45–72 | 0.84 |
| CD4+CD39+ Treg | 48 | 46–94 | 74 | 54–87 | 0.96 |
| CD4+PD-1+/ | 50 | 37–67 | 50 | 44–63 | 0.81 |
| CD4+CD152+ | 27 | 7.2–40 | 29 | 13.2–50 | 0.63 |
| CD4+CD39+ | 48 | 12–61 | 33 | 19–55 | 0.99 |
| CD4+ CD39+PD1+ | 35 | 6–59 | 20 | 7–32 | 0.50 |
| CD4+CD152+PD1+ | 15 | 4.8–20 | 13 | 8–32 | 0.94 |
Percent frequencies of HNSCC infiltrating CD8+ T cell subsets in Group 1 and Group 2.
| T Cell Subsets | Group 1 | Group 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | Median | IQR | ||
| CD3+CD8+/CD3+ | 40.7 | 29–44.1 | 20 | 17–45 | 0.63 |
| CD8+CD28+/CD8+ | 23 | 15–34 | 74 | 67–82 | 0.0006 |
| CD8+CD28−/CD8+ | 77 | 66–85 | 26 | 18–33 | 0.0006 |
| Naïve CD8+/CD8+ | 1 | 0.2–4.1 | 0.6 | 0.3–1.7 | 0.66 |
| CM CD8+/CD8+ | 1.8 | 0.1–3.3 | 1.2 | 0.4–2.5 | 0.72 |
| EM CD8+/CD8+ | 62 | 49–74 | 79 | 63–84 | 0.07 |
| TEM CD8+/CD8+ | 31 | 24–50 | 17 | 14–32 | 0.14 |
| CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ | 28.9 | 16–51 | 6.2 | 4.4–15.9 | 0.03 |
| CD8+CD28-CD127−CD39+PD-1+ | 10.6 | 2.1–27.9 | 2.1 | 0.4–2.8 | 0.18 |
| CD8+PD-1+ | 60 | 36.4–81 | 61 | 52–67 | 0.99 |
| CD8+PD-1- | 37 | 18–51 | 34 | 23–38 | 0.84 |
| CD8+CD152+ | 5 | 2–8.7 | 2.3 | 1.5–8 | 0.69 |
| CD8+CD39+ | 50 | 25–54 | 20.6 | 12–47.5 | 0.25 |
| CD8+PD1+CD152+ | 4 | 0.7–7 | 1.7 | 0.5–4.5 | 0.51 |
| CD8+PD1+CD39+ | 38 | 4.3–48 | 18 | 10–39 | 0.61 |
Figure 1Frequency of tumor infiltrating CD8+CD28+ T cells, CD8+CD28− T cells and CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ Treg from HNSCC patients. (A–C): Comparative analysis of the frequencies of CD8+CD28+ T cells (Panel A), CD8+CD28− T cells (Panel B) and CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ Treg (Panel C) between Group 1 and Group 2 patients. (D–F): Survival of HNSCC patients divided into two groups based on the median (calculated in the overall population) of frequency of either CD8+CD28+ T lymphocytes (> or <47.5%) (Panel D), CD8+CD28− T lymphocytes (> or <52.5%) (Panel E) or CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ Treg (> or <13.5%) (Panel F).
Figure 2Phenotypic characterization of tumor infiltrating CD8+CD28− T cells based on the levels of PD-1 expression. A and B. CD28− T cells were gated and tumor infiltrating CD8+CD28− T cells from representative patients #13 (A) and #19 (B) were divided in three subpopulations (CD8+CD28−PD-1hi, CD8+CD28−PD1int and CD8+CD28−PD-1lo/−, respectively) based on the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of PD-1 expression (left panels). CD8+CD28−PD-1hi, CD8+CD28−PD-1int and CD8+CD28−PD-1lo were considered cells with PD-1 MFI > 103, >102 and <103, or <102, respectively. The frequencies of CD127−CD39+ T cells (middle panels) and of CD39+TIM-3+ T cells (right panels) are separately shown for CD8+CD28−PD-1hi, CD8+CD28−PD-1int and CD8+CD28−PD-1lo. (C) MFI mean values of PD-1 (left panel), CD39 (middle panel) and TIM-3 (right panel) in CD8+CD28−PD-1hi, CD8+CD28−PD-1int and CD8+CD28−PD-1lo/− tumor infiltrating T cells from our series of HNSCC patients.
Figure 3Multiparametric phenotypic characterization of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells from HNSCC patients. (A): tSNE algorithm was applied to the analysis of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells from patient #13. A red circle identifies a map area where cell clusters, negative for CD28, CD127, CD45RA and CCR7 expression and highly positive for PD-1, CD39 and TIM-3 expression, segregate. The colorimetric scale of expression is shown below each graph (blue clusters indicate absent expression, red clusters represent high expression). (B): t-SNE algorithm was applied to the analysis of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells from patient #27. A red circle identifies a map area where cell clusters, negative for CD28 and CD127 expression, highly positive for PD-1 and CD39 expression, and partly positive for TIM-3 and EOMES expression, segregate. The colorimetric scale of expression is shown below each graph (blue clusters indicate absent expression, red clusters represent high expression). (C): Frequencies of CD39-PD-1- T cells among tumor infiltrating CD8+CD28− T lymphocytes in Group 1 and 2 patients.
Figure 4Relationship between tumor infiltrating CD8+CD28−PD1hi T cells and CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ Treg in HNSCC patients. (A): Mean frequencies of CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ Treg among CD8+CD28−PD-1lo, CD8+CD28−PD-1int and CD8+CD28−PD-1hi T cell subpopulations. Statistical significant differences are evidenced. (B): Statistical correlation between the frequency of tumor infiltrating CD8+CD28−PD-1hi T cells and that of tumor infiltrating CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ Treg in our cohort of HNSCC patients. (C): Proliferation suppression assay performed with the CD8+ T cell infiltrate from the representative patient #5 containing comparable frequencies of CD8+CD28−PD-1hi (66%) and CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ Treg (60%). The percentages of T cell proliferation under unstimulated conditions (left panel) or anti-CD3 UCHT1 mAb–stimulated conditions in absence (middle panel) or presence (right panel) of tumor infiltrating CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ Treg (CD8+ Treg in the Figure) are shown; the percentage of proliferation inhibition by CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+Treg is shown in parentheses in the right panel. One out of two concordant experiments performed with cells of different patients.
Figure 5Further phenotypic characterization of tumor infiltrating CD8+CD28−PD-1hi/CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ T cells. (A): t-SNE algorithm was applied to the analysis of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells from patient #28. A red frame identifies a map area where cell clusters, negative for CD28 and CD127 expression and highly positive for CD39, PD-1, TIM-3 and CD103 expression, segregate. The colorimetric scale of expression is shown below each graph (blue clusters indicate absent expression, red clusters represent high expression). (B): t-SNE algorithm was applied to the analysis of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells from patient #28. A red circle identifies a map area where cell clusters, negative for CD28 and CD127 expression and highly positive for CD39, PD-1, CD137 and ki-67 expression, segregate. The colorimetric scale of expression is shown below each graph (blue clusters indicate absent expression, red clusters represent high expression). (C): Staining of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells (upper row), CD8+CD28−CD127−CD39+ Treg (middle row) and CD8+CD28−PD-1hi T cells (lower row) from patient #30 with a G250 HLSTAFARV217–225 loaded HLA-A2 pentamer. An unrelated, hTert ILAKFLHWL540–548 loaded HLA-A2 pentamer was used as negative control (upper, right panel).
Figure 6Schematic representation of the “effector-to-regulatory CD8+ T cell transition” at the tumor site.