| Literature DB >> 34066073 |
Renu Geetha Bai1,2, Kasturi Muthoosamy1, Rando Tuvikene2, Huang Nay Ming3, Sivakumar Manickam1,4.
Abstract
The detection of cancer biomarkers in the early stages could prevent cancer-related deaths significantly. Nanomaterials combined with biomolecules are extensively used in drug delivery, imaging, and sensing applications by targeting the overexpressed cancer proteins such as folate receptors (FRs) to control the disease by providing earlier treatments. In this investigation, biocompatible reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanosheets combined with folic acid (FA)-a vitamin with high bioaffinity to FRs-is utilized to develop an electrochemical sensor for cancer detection. To mimic the cancer cell environment, FR-β protein is used to evaluate the response of the rGO-FA sensor. The formation of the rGO-FA nanocomposite was confirmed through various characterization techniques. A glassy carbon (GC) electrode was then modified with the obtained rGO-FA and analyzed via differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) for its specific detection towards FRs. Using the DPV technique, the rGO-FA-modified electrode exhibited a limit of detection (LOD) of 1.69 pM, determined in a linear concentration range from 6 to 100 pM. This excellent electrochemical performance towards FRs detection could provide a significant contribution towards future cancer diagnosis. Moreover, the rGO-FA sensing platform also showed excellent specificity and reliability when tested against similar interfering biomolecules. This rGO-FA sensor offers a great promise to the future medical industry through its highly sensitive detection towards FRs in a fast, reliable, and economical way.Entities:
Keywords: biosensor; cancer biomarker; differential pulse voltammetry; electrochemical sensor; folate receptor; folate targeted; folic acid; rGO-FA
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066073 PMCID: PMC8150695 DOI: 10.3390/nano11051272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1UV-Vis spectroscopic analysis of rGO (0.1 mg/mL), FA (0.1 mg/mL), and FA-conjugated rGO (rGO-FA) (0.1 mg/mL) in aqueous solutions. The red shift of the rGO-FA spectra was observed compared to the spectra of rGO and FA alone.
Figure 2FTIR spectroscopic analysis of dried forms of rGO, FA, and rGO-FA using spectroscopic grade KBr-based pellets.
Figure 3XRD analysis of dried rGO, FA, and rGO-FA.
Figure 4SEM images of rGO, FA, and rGO-FA at lower (left) and higher (right) magnifications.
Figure 5HRTEM images of rGO and rGO-FA.
EDAX analysis results of rGO-FA.
| Material | Carbon | Oxygen | Nitrogen (wt%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| rGO | 59.41 | 40.59 | - |
| FA | 62.26 | 28.21 | 9.53 |
| rGO-FA | 68.70 | 18.05 | 13.25 |
Figure 6CV analysis of bare GC, rGO/GC, rGO-FA/GC, and rGO-FA/GC + 10 nM FR in 0.1 M [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.
Figure 7EIS spectra of bare GC, rGO/GC, rGO-FA/GC, and rGO-FA/GC + 10 nM FR in 0.1 M [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− at a frequency range of 10 Hz–100 kHz.
Figure 8DPV analysis of rGO-FA with the addition of FR at the predetermined intervals at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.
FA–FR-based sensing studies for cancer cell detection.
| Sensing Material | Working Electrode | Material or Cell Line Used and Range of Detection | Limit of Detection | Method | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA-DNA–SWNT | Au | FR | 3 pM | DPV | [ |
| FA-DNA | Au | FR | 0.3 ng/mL | CV | [ |
| CNTs@PDA-FA | GC | HL-60 cells | 5 × 102 cells | EIS | [ |
| MPA/(Fc-PEI/SWNT) | Au | HeLa cells | 10 cells | DPV | [ |
| PNT–FA | G | HeLa cells | 250 cells | CV | [ |
| PNT–FA | G | FR (8–13 nM) | 8 nM | CV | [ |
| Au/MUA-FA | Au | HeLa cells | 6 cells | EIS | [ |
| Au-FA | BDD | HeLa cells (10–105 cells/ mL) | 10 cells | EIS | [ |
| FA-AuNPs | Au | Hela cells | Not indicated | CV | [ |
| FA-GSH-GNPs | - | HeLa cells | 100 cells | Absorbance | [ |
| FA/PEI/CMC-G | GC | HL-60 cells | 500 cells | EIS | [ |
| FA- MHDA-HT-Fc | Au beads | HeLa cells | 10 cells | DPV | [ |
| rGO-FA | GC | FR (6–100 pM) | 1.69 pM | DPV | This work |
Au: gold, DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid, SWNT: single-walled carbon nanotubes, SSA: steady-state amperometry, CNTs@PDA: polydopamine-modified carbon nanotubes, MPA: 3- mercaptopropionic acid, G: graphene, Fc-PEI: poly(ethylene imine) functionalized with ferrocene, PNT: peptide nanotube, MUA: 11 mercapto undecanoic acid, NPs: nanoparticles, BDD: boron-doped diamond, PTCA: 3,4,9,10-perylene tetracarboxylic acid, CCG: chemically converted graphene, GNPs: gold nanoparticles, GSH: glutathione, GC: glassy carbon, PEI: polyethyleneimine, CMC: carboxymethyl chitosan, G: graphene, MHDA: mercaptohexadecanoic acid, HT: hexanethiol, Fc: ferrocenyl.
Figure 9Interference analysis of rGO-FA with the addition of SP/HSA (100 pM) at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.