J A Ledermann1, S Canevari2, T Thigpen3. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK. 2. Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy silvana.canevari@istitutotumori.mi.it. 3. Hematology and Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical School, Jackson, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In cancer therapy, molecularly targeted agents have the potential to maximize antitumor efficacy while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. However, these agents may only be effective in specific tumor subtypes with defined genomic profiles. This emphasizes the importance of developing personalized cancer therapeutic strategies (i.e. through the use of companion diagnostic tests) to appropriately select and treat patients who are likely to benefit from specific targeted therapies, thus leading to improvements in clinical and safety outcomes. A potential biological target is the folate receptor (FR), which has been shown to be overexpressed on the surface of many cancers, including tumors of the lungs and ovaries. DESIGN: We carried out a literature search to identify how the FR can be a potential target for selected tumors, and how the FR expression can be exploited by targeted therapies. RESULTS: The two main therapeutic strategies for targeting the FR are based on the use of: (i) an anti-FR antibody (e.g. farletuzumab) and (ii) folate conjugates of folate-targeted chemotherapies and companion radiodiagnostic imaging agents (e.g. vintafolide and (99m)technetium-etarfolatide). Both of these strategies are being assessed in phase III trials. CONCLUSIONS: The important role that the FR plays in cancer development and progression has led to the development of FR-targeted therapeutic approaches. To date, the promising data observed in phase II clinical trials have not been confirmed in phase III studies. Accordingly, there is a need for further research in the refinement of patient selection and identification of new therapeutic combinations. In particular, the development of these targeted therapies requires reliable methods to be developed to detect FR-positive tumors in order to help select patients who may benefit from treatment.
BACKGROUND: In cancer therapy, molecularly targeted agents have the potential to maximize antitumor efficacy while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. However, these agents may only be effective in specific tumor subtypes with defined genomic profiles. This emphasizes the importance of developing personalized cancer therapeutic strategies (i.e. through the use of companion diagnostic tests) to appropriately select and treat patients who are likely to benefit from specific targeted therapies, thus leading to improvements in clinical and safety outcomes. A potential biological target is the folate receptor (FR), which has been shown to be overexpressed on the surface of many cancers, including tumors of the lungs and ovaries. DESIGN: We carried out a literature search to identify how the FR can be a potential target for selected tumors, and how the FR expression can be exploited by targeted therapies. RESULTS: The two main therapeutic strategies for targeting the FR are based on the use of: (i) an anti-FR antibody (e.g. farletuzumab) and (ii) folate conjugates of folate-targeted chemotherapies and companion radiodiagnostic imaging agents (e.g. vintafolide and (99m)technetium-etarfolatide). Both of these strategies are being assessed in phase III trials. CONCLUSIONS: The important role that the FR plays in cancer development and progression has led to the development of FR-targeted therapeutic approaches. To date, the promising data observed in phase II clinical trials have not been confirmed in phase III studies. Accordingly, there is a need for further research in the refinement of patient selection and identification of new therapeutic combinations. In particular, the development of these targeted therapies requires reliable methods to be developed to detect FR-positive tumors in order to help select patients who may benefit from treatment.
Authors: Kathleen N Moore; Hossein Borghaei; David M O'Malley; Woondong Jeong; Shelly M Seward; Todd M Bauer; Raymond P Perez; Ursula A Matulonis; Kelli L Running; Xiaoyan Zhang; Jose F Ponte; Rodrigo Ruiz-Soto; Michael J Birrer Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Reji N Nair; Jitendra K Mishra; Fangzheng Li; Mariola Tortosa; Chunying Yang; Joanne R Doherty; Michael Cameron; John L Cleveland; William R Roush; Thomas D Bannister Journal: Medchemcomm Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 3.597
Authors: Steve S Cho; Ryan Zeh; John T Pierce; Jun Jeon; MacLean Nasrallah; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; Jason G Newman; Caitlin White; Julia Kharlip; Peter Snyder; Philip Low; Sunil Singhal; M Sean Grady; John Y K Lee Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 2.703