| Literature DB >> 34064730 |
Igor Buzalewicz1, Agnieszka Ulatowska-Jarża1, Aleksandra Kaczorowska1, Marlena Gąsior-Głogowska1, Halina Podbielska1, Magdalena Karwańska2, Alina Wieliczko2, Anna K Matczuk3, Katarzyna Kowal4, Marta Kopaczyńska1.
Abstract
Quantifying changes in bacteria cells in the presence of antibacterial treatment is one of the main challenges facing contemporary medicine; it is a challenge that is relevant for tackling issues pertaining to bacterial biofilm formation that substantially decreases susceptibility to biocidal agents. Three-dimensional label-free imaging and quantitative analysis of bacteria-photosensitizer interactions, crucial for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy, is still limited due to the use of conventional imaging techniques. We present a new method for investigating the alterations in living cells and quantitatively analyzing the process of bacteria photodynamic inactivation. Digital holographic tomography (Entities:
Keywords: digital holographic tomography; photodynamic inactivation; single-cell bacteria
Year: 2021 PMID: 34064730 PMCID: PMC8151141 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The characterization of the PS’s absorption (A) and luminescence spectra (B) for excitation at 405 nm with central wavelengths and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of spectral bands, and (C) attenuated total reflectance—Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectra of PSs in PBS buffer deposited on the silica glass surfaces.
Figure 2The exemplary results for E. coli cell on AVC material (non-photoactive): (A) reconstructed 2D-RI map (raw-data) with E. coli cells on the surface of AVC material; (B) 3D rendered and digitally stained single cell; (C) averaged 3D-RI distribution of single cell from all 2D-RI maps (slices) on which the cells were present; (D) distribution of averaged 3D-RI isolines; (E) pseudo-3D representation of averaged RI distribution; (F) cross-section of the isolines for different averaged 3D-RI values corresponding to the region occupied by a single cell.
Figure 3The representative 2D-RI maps of single E. coli (A) and S. aureus (B) cells on AVC (control), AVC-Ce6, AVC-Pheo materials and the averaged RI differences with standard deviations (C).
Figure 4(1) Representative confocal 2D microscopic images (combined DIC-fluorescence images) of E. coli cells penetrated by Ce6 (A), Pheo (B), and S. aureus cells penetrated by Ce6 (C) and Pheo (D) photosensitizers; (white-dashed lines indicate the planes for which the axial (X-Z, Y-Z) cross-sections (∆z = 3µm, with resolution: 0.04 µm) were extracted). (2) The boxplot representing the variation of the fluorescence intensity in the region of single cells.
Figure 5(A) Representative 2D-RI maps of E. coli and S. aureus cells grown on the surface of three kinds of AVC materials (24 h after photodynamic treatment) mean values of the cells’ number (N8h, N24h) and its standard deviation 8 and 24 h after photoexcitation. (Red ellipses indicate the bacterial cells clusters characteristic for biofilm formation; yellow arrows indicate the photosensitizer’s aggregates in the material). (B) The exemplary enlarged 2D-RI maps of characteristic structures (cells clusters—(1,2); aggregates—(3)) indicated on (A). (C) The efficiency of the photodynamic inactivation EFF (detailed description in Section 4.8).
Figure 6Bacteria single-cell division. (1) The exemplary results demonstrating the process of E. coli cell division by changes of its RI values: the representative average 3D-RI distribution of single-cell (A) and distribution of averaged 3D-RI isolines (B) demonstrating the process of accumulation of the cytoplasmic components on two opposite ends of the cell and the nearly complete synthetization of the septum revealed by RI data (orange arrows indicate the septum location characteristic for one of the last stages of the cell division); (2) the exemplary rendered and digitally stained E. coli and S. aureus dividing cells from their reconstructed 3D-RI distributions (red—corresponding to the highest RI values of cell interior, green—corresponding to the lowest RI values of the outer regions of the cell); (3) the changes of the averaged RI between non-dividing and dividing cells on the surface of different photoexcited materials (AVC-Ce6, AVC-Pheo).
Figure 7The 2D-RI maps with digitally stained cells of E. coli: (A) 8 h after photoexcitation and (B) 10 h after photoexcitation. Red-stained cells had RI values changing in the range from 1.368 to 1.375. The yellow ellipses indicate the stained cells, in which neighborhood the additional cells (indicated by red arrows) appear after the cell’s division. The white circles indicate initially stained cells, which turned out to be incapable of division after 2 h of the beginning of the examination. Red arrows indicate new cells not present 2 h earlier. A1–A3, B1–B3 are representative enlarged 2D-RI maps of cells (detailed description in text). The white scale bars for A1–A3, B1–B3 are equal to 2 µm.
Figure 8Representative boxplot showing the changes of RI values of photo-inactivated and living cells of E. coli on the surface of AVC-Ce6 material within 3 h of examination.
Figure 9The schema of the experimental system and the RI data processing. M, flat mirrors; BS, beam splitters; MO, microscopic objective; M1,M2, mirrors on the rotational arm; CAM, digital camera.
Figure 10Schema of the bacteria samples’ examination. Single cells treated and untreated by PS (1), as well as cells in the presence of PS after photodynamic effect induction (2). Detailed explanation of the steps followed is described in text.