C K Lee1, Y P Chua, A Saw. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. kenetto@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Pin site infection is a common problem in external fixation. Plain gauze wetted with normal saline is commonly used for a pin site dressing owing to the simplicity and low cost. Evidence to support adding an antimicrobial agent in the dressing material is lacking. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared the rate of pin tract infection using plain gauze and gauze impregnated with polyhexamethylene biguanide in patients undergoing limb lengthening procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 38 patients (40 limbs) undergoinglimb lengthening or deformity correction using an external fixatorbetween July 2009 and June 2010. There were 23 male patients and 15 female patients, with a mean age of 26.3 years (range, 5-68 years). The patients were randomized into two groups: a polyhexamethylene biguanide group (22 limbs) and a control group (18 limbs). The metal-skin interfaces were assessed by a researcher blinded to the type of gauze at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery for the pin site infection based on a predetermined grading system. There were a total of 483 metal-skin interfaces, with 1932 total observations. Infection rates were compared using the chi square test and relative risk with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: The infection rate was lower (χ(2) [1, n = 1932] = 23.00) and the risk for infection was lower (relative risk, 0.228; 95% confidence interval, 0.118, 0.443) for the polyhexamethylene biguanide group (n = 1068; 1.0%) than for the control group (n = 864; 4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Use of polyhexamethylene biguanide-impregnated gauze can reduce the risk of pin tract infection in external fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Pin site infection is a common problem in external fixation. Plain gauze wetted with normal saline is commonly used for a pin site dressing owing to the simplicity and low cost. Evidence to support adding an antimicrobial agent in the dressing material is lacking. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared the rate of pintract infection using plain gauze and gauze impregnated with polyhexamethylene biguanide in patients undergoing limb lengthening procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 38 patients (40 limbs) undergoing limb lengthening or deformity correction using an external fixator between July 2009 and June 2010. There were 23 male patients and 15 female patients, with a mean age of 26.3 years (range, 5-68 years). The patients were randomized into two groups: a polyhexamethylene biguanide group (22 limbs) and a control group (18 limbs). The metal-skin interfaces were assessed by a researcher blinded to the type of gauze at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery for the pin site infection based on a predetermined grading system. There were a total of 483 metal-skin interfaces, with 1932 total observations. Infection rates were compared using the chi square test and relative risk with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: The infection rate was lower (χ(2) [1, n = 1932] = 23.00) and the risk for infection was lower (relative risk, 0.228; 95% confidence interval, 0.118, 0.443) for the polyhexamethylene biguanide group (n = 1068; 1.0%) than for the control group (n = 864; 4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Use of polyhexamethylene biguanide-impregnated gauze can reduce the risk of pintract infection in external fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: N Stoesser; K Emary; S Soklin; K Peng An; S Sophal; S Chhomrath; N P J Day; D Limmathurotsakul; P Nget; Y Pangnarith; S Sona; V Kumar; C E Moore; N Chanpheaktra; C M Parry Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Igor Buzalewicz; Agnieszka Ulatowska-Jarża; Aleksandra Kaczorowska; Marlena Gąsior-Głogowska; Halina Podbielska; Magdalena Karwańska; Alina Wieliczko; Anna K Matczuk; Katarzyna Kowal; Marta Kopaczyńska Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 5.923