| Literature DB >> 34063701 |
Heldeney Rodrigues Sousa1, Idglan Sá Lima1, Lucas Matheus Lima Neris1, Albert Santos Silva1, Ariane Maria Silva Santos Nascimento1, Francisca Pereira Araújo1, Rafael Felippe Ratke2, Durcilene Alves Silva1,3, Josy Anteveli Osajima1, Leilson Rocha Bezerra4, Edson Cavalcanti Silva-Filho1.
Abstract
Agricultural production is influenced by the water content in the soil and availability of fertilizers. Thus, superabsorbent hydrogels, based on polyacrylamide, natural cashew tree gum (CG) and potassium hydrogen phosphate (PHP), as fertilizer and water releaser were developed. The structure, morphology, thermal stability and chemical composition of samples of polyacrylamide and cashew tree gum hydrogels with the presence of fertilizer (HCGP) and without fertilizer (HCG) were investigated, using X-ray diffractometry (XRD), Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA/DTG) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS). Swelling/reswelling tests, textural analysis, effect of pH, release of nutrients and kinetics were determined; the ecotoxicity of the hydrogels was investigated by the Artemia salina test. The results showed that PHP incorporation in the hydrogel favored the crosslinking of chains. This increased the thermal stability in HCGP but decreased the hardness and adhesion properties. The HCGP demonstrated good swelling capacity (~15,000 times) and an excellent potential for reuse after fifty-five consecutive cycles. The swelling was favored in an alkaline pH due to the ionization of hydrophilic groups. The sustained release of phosphorus in HCGP was described by the Korsmeyer-Peppas model, and Fickian diffusion is the main fertilizer release mechanism. Finally, the hydrogels do not demonstrate toxicity, and HCGP has potential for application in agriculture.Entities:
Keywords: agriculture; controlled release fertilizer; interpenetrating polymer network
Year: 2021 PMID: 34063701 PMCID: PMC8125684 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structural characterization of hydrogel samples and isolated constituents by (a) XRD and (b) FTIR analysis.
Values of CrI and ∆CrI determined for HCG and HCGP hydrogels.
| Sample | CrI | (∆CrI)% |
|---|---|---|
| PAM | 77.98 | -- |
| HGC | 84.69 | 8.59 |
| HGCP | 79.89 | 2.44 |
FTIR bands and their assignments for CG, PAM, HCG and HCGP.
| Sample | Wave Number (cm−1) | Functional Group/Chemical Bond |
|---|---|---|
| HCG | 3382 | Stretching O–H bond in hydroxyl groups |
| 2935 and 2890 | C–H stretching | |
| 1642 and 1375 | Deformation O–H bond and flexion C-H bond | |
| 1158, 1080 and 1038 | C–O–C glycosidic bonds and O–H bending from alcohols | |
| PAM | 3401 and 3193 | Axial deformation vibrations in N–H bond |
| 1670 and 1610 | C=O stretching vibration in amide and N–H stretching vibration in amide | |
| 1450, 1414, and 1102 | –CH2 scissoring, CN and N–H stretching vibrations | |
| HCG and HCGP | 3600–3000 | Overlap of the N–H and O–H stretching vibration |
| 1669 | C=O stretching | |
| 1564 and 1566 | N–H stretching vibration in amide group | |
| 885 | Out-of-plane C–H bending vibrations |
Figure 2Thermal analysis of CG, HCG and HCGP sample investigated by (a) TGA and (b) DTG curves.
Figure 3SEM images in different magnifications for samples (a,b) HCG, (c,d) HCGP and semi-quantitative analyses by EDS for the (e) HCGand (f) HCGP samples.
Figure 4(a) Swelling degree as a function of time for the hydrogels samples and physical changes in superabsorbent; (b) HCG and (c) HCGP before and after the swelling test.
Swelling capacity of hydrogels based on other polysaccharides.
| Hydrogel Type | Swelling Capacity (g/g) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Tamarind kernel gum | 648 | [ |
| Guar gum | 625 | [ |
| Agar | 14 | [ |
| Lignin | 280 | [ |
| Galactomannan | 115 | [ |
| Acrylic acid | 5066 | [ |
| Agarose | 15 | [ |
| Starch | 921.8 | [ |
| Cashew tree gum | 240 | This work |
| Cashew tree gum with fertilizer | 150 | This work |
Figure 5Evaluation of the (a) reswelling capacity and (b) water release time by HCG and HCGP hydrogels.
Figure 6Investigation of the pH-dependent equilibrium swelling ratio of the HCG and HCGP hydrogels.
Figure 7Phosphorus release from the HCGP hydrogel.
Figure 8Fertilizer release kinetics according to mathematical models: (a) zero order, (b) first order, (c) Higuchi and (d) Korsmeyer–Peppas.
Textural analysis for HCG and HCGP hydrogels.
| Sample | Hardness (g) | Adhesion Strength (g) | Adhesiveness (mJ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCG | 1345.0 | 45.0 | 9.4 |
| HCGP | 215.0 | 25.0 | 1.4 |
Figure 9Scheme of copolymerization reaction of the cashew tree range with polyacrylamide, where CG = cashew tree gum; R = Primary radicals (SO4• or OH•), AM = Acrylamide.
Figure 10Determination of ecotoxicity in Artemia salina for HCG and HCGP hydrogels after (a) 24 and (b) 48 h.