Etomidate and its Analogs: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

Etomidate is a hypnotic agent that is used for the induction of anesthesia. It produces its effect by acting as a positive allosteric modulator on the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor and thus enhancing the effect of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid. Etomidate stands out among other anesthetic agents by having a remarkably stable cardiorespiratory profile, producing no cardiovascular or respiratory depression. However, etomidate suppresses the adrenocortical axis by the inhibition of the enzyme 11β-hydroxylase. This makes the drug unsuitable for administration by a prolonged infusion. It also makes the drug unsuitable for administration to critically ill patients. Etomidate has relatively large volumes of distributions and is rapidly metabolized by hepatic esterases into an inactive carboxylic acid through hydrolyzation. Because of the decrease in popularity of etomidate, few modern extensive pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies exist. Over the last decade, several analogs of etomidate have been developed, with the aim of retaining its stable cardiorespiratory profile, whilst eliminating its suppressive effect on the adrenocortical axis. One of these molecules, ABP-700, was studied in extensive phase I clinical trials. These found that ABP-700 is characterized by small volumes of distribution and rapid clearance. ABP-700 is metabolized similarly to etomidate, by hydrolyzation into an inactive carboxylic acid. Furthermore, ABP-700 showed a rapid onset and offset of clinical effect. One side effect observed with both etomidate and ABP-700 is the occurrence of involuntary muscle movements. The origin of these movements is unclear and warrants further research.

Key Points

Introduction

Etomidate is an imidazole-based agonist of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor used for the induction of general anesthesia and sedation. It was initially developed as an antifungal agent in 1964 by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, but during animal studies, its hypnotic effect was serendipitously observed [1]. It was introduced to clinical practice in Europe in 1972 [2] and was the first non-barbiturate intravenous anesthetic on the market [3].

Etomidate produces a swift onset of hypnotic effect, similarly to barbiturates and propofol, mainly through its action on the GABAA receptor. It has no analgesic effect. A major advantage of etomidate is that it barely impacts the cardiovascular system. It produces minimal changes in systemic blood pressure and heart rate, which makes it an excellent drug to use in patients who are hemodynamically unstable, who have cardiac disease, [4, 5] or even those in hemorrhagic shock [6]. Other favorable properties of etomidate are that it causes little respiratory depression and no histamine release. Notable side effects of etomidate include postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain on injection, and myoclonic movements [7, 8] or involuntary muscle movements (IMM), during induction and emergence.

Up until 1983, etomidate was increasingly used as an intravenous anesthetic. In 1983, however, an increased mortality rate in patients who received etomidate was reported [9]. Several studies subsequently showed that etomidate caused adrenocortical suppression by the inhibition of the cytochrome P450 enzyme 11β-hydroxylase, making it unsuitable as a drug for the maintenance of anesthesia or sedation [10, 11]. After these reports, etomidate use decreased and it was mainly reserved for the induction of anesthesia in patients who were hemodynamically unstable.

In the past decade, interest in etomidate was renewed as several research groups tried to alter the chemical structure of etomidate to create a novel anesthetic agent that would retain its favorable hemodynamic properties but lack its adrenocortical suppression [12-14]. Cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl-metomidate (CPMM, currently known as ABP-700) is one of the soft analogs of etomidate that is currently under development for use as an anesthetic agent. It was one of several soft analogs of etomidate designed to retain the favorable pharmacological properties of etomidate whilst diminishing its adrenal suppressive effects. This article aims to critically review and summarize the existing literature on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of etomidate and its analogs, especially ABP-700.

Methods

The MEDLINE database was searched through PubMed. A search for English articles with a title or an abstract containing ‘etomidate’ in combination with ‘pharmacokinetic(s)’, ‘pharmacodynamics(s)’ and/or ‘pharmacology’, or with the medical subject heading (MeSH) term ‘etomidate’ combined with the MeSH terms ‘hypnotics and sedatives/pharmacology’ or ‘anesthetics, intravenous/pharmacology’ yielded 696 results (as of September 2020). All abstracts were screened and when considered relevant, the paper’s full text was obtained and saved in a Mendeley library [15]. Additional searches were performed including the keywords ‘myoclonus’, ‘adrenal suppression’, ‘hepatic failure’, ‘renal failure’, ‘elderly’, ‘pediatric’, ‘neonate(s)’, ‘interactions’, and ‘etomidate analogue’. Bibliographies of articles were reviewed and as such, additional potentially relevant papers were identified and added to the library. The final library consists of 224 articles, of which 156 are used definitively for this review.

Drug Formulation and Dosing

Etomidate, or R-1-(1-ethylphenyl)imidazole-5-ethylester (Fig. 1), was originally synthesized as a racemic mixture, but it was found that the R(+)-enantiomer had higher hypnotic potency [16]. Because etomidate is a weak base (pKa = 4.5), it is hydrophobic at a physiologic pH of 7.4, and therefore badly soluble in aqueous solutions [17, 18]. Currently, etomidate is clinically available in either a 0.2% solution in 35% propylene glycol (Hypnomidate®; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Beerse, Belgium; marketed in the USA as Amidate®; Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) or as a lipid emulsion (Etomidate-Lipuro, Braun, Melsungen, Germany) [18, 19]. Standard dosing for the induction of anesthesia is 0.3 mg/kg, after which hypnosis lasts for 5–10 min [20]. Alternative (off-label) dosing regimens that have been explored experimentally include oral transmucosal administration [21] and rectal administration [22].

Fig. 1

Chemical structure of etomidate

The formulation of CPMM (or most frequently known as ABP-700, Fig. 2) is a 10-mg/mL solution, with 10% sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin as a solvent [23]. Bolus doses of 0.25 mg/kg and 0.35 mg/kg are found to be the most optimal doses for the induction of anesthesia [24], whereas an optimal continuous infusion dose has yet to be determined, although an infusion rate of 50 µg/kg/min seems to have the most optimal effect vs the side effect balance [23]. ABP-700 is currently under development.

Fig. 2

Chemical structure of cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl-metomidate (or ABP-700)

Pre-clinical Development of Etomidate Analogs

In the development of analogs of etomidate, several strategies were applied to eliminate the adrenocortical suppression induced by etomidate. Prior to the development of ABP-700, the first analog of etomidate that was designed was methoxycarbonyl-etomidate (MOC-etomidate), a soft analog [12]. A soft analog is a molecule that is derived from a parent compound and is specifically designed to undergo predictable and rapid metabolism into inactive metabolites [25]. The objective of this molecule is to mostly alter the design of etomidate to enable ultra-rapid metabolism by non-specific esterases to a carboxylic acid by adding a new ester moiety that would be prone to fast hydrolysis. This would prevent it from binding to the hydrophobic catalytic site of the 11β-hydroxylase enzyme [26] and thus, reduce the possibility of adrenocortical suppression. In vitro and in vivo studies of MOC-etomidate showed that it retains the rapid onset of hypnosis and hemodynamic stability of etomidate, and, because of ultra-rapid metabolism, causes ultra-rapid hypnotic recovery [12]. Additionally, 30 min after a single bolus administration, MOC-etomidate did not cause a significant reduction in the adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated serum corticosterone level in rats, whilst an equipotent dose of etomidate did so significantly. However, because of the ultra-rapid metabolism of MOC-etomidate, large quantities of drug were necessary to maintain an acceptable depth of anesthesia in rats and this in turn did lead to adrenocortical suppression [27]. Furthermore, equally large quantities of metabolite were being produced. Furthermore, despite the 300-fold lower potency of the metabolite of MOC-etomidate, it was sufficient to produce burst suppression and cause a delayed recovery in rats [28, 29].

A pharmacodynamic solution for the occurrence of adrenocortical suppression through etomidate was also considered in the form of carboetomidate, a pyrrole-based sedative hypnotic analog of etomidate [13]. By designing out the imidazole ring thought to be responsible for adrenocortical suppression through an interaction with the heme-group in 11β-hydroxylase, adrenocortical suppression was indeed diminished. However, in rats, carboetomidate caused a relatively slow onset of hypnosis compared with etomidate, as it was less potent as a hypnotic. Hemodynamic stability was maintained during dosing [13].

Because the pharmacokinetic properties of MOC-etomidate were too fast, MOC-etomidate was adapted into 13 new analogs that attempted to slow down its fast pharmacokinetics. This was done by adding various aliphatic substituents onto the two-carbon spacer in MOC-etomidate, which would sterically protect the ‘bare’ ester moiety so that hydrolysis could slow down [30]. Of these 13 new analogs, two molecules, dimethyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate and cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl-metomidate (CPMM), showed high hypnotic potencies and a duration of action between that of MOC-etomidate and etomidate upon single bolus administration in rats. Upon prolonged infusions of both compounds, it was found that CPMM in particular demonstrated a context insensitive and swift recovery profile [31] and that adrenocortical suppression was significantly shorter than with etomidate [32].

In pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) studies of CPMM in beagle dogs, similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties were observed: rapid metabolism, ultra-rapid hypnotic action, and a swift recovery profile, regardless of the duration of the infusion [33]. Furthermore, CPMM showed an adrenocortical recovery profile that was similar to that of propofol, the current standard of care, where 90 min after ending a continuous infusion of 2 h, adrenocortical function was equivalent. One side effect observed during administration to beagle dogs was the occurrence of IMM, similar to what might be observed with etomidate. The incidence of these movements was higher during CPMM infusion than etomidate infusion. These movements could successfully be attenuated by midazolam [33]. Based on these promising pharmacological results, CPMM, or ABP-700 as it was called from that point onward, was put forward for clinical studies in healthy volunteers.

Adverse Effects

Adrenal Suppression

As mentioned previously, the most infamous side effect of etomidate, which has led to a significant reduction in its clinical use as a hypnotic, is the suppression of the adrenocortical axis. The first to report this side effect were Ledingham and Watt in 1983. They had observed an increase in mortality in critically ill patients who were mechanically ventilated and continuously sedated with etomidate vs patients who had been sedated with benzodiazepines (69% compared with 25%, respectively) [9]. Around the same time, pre-clinical data emerged reporting that etomidate suppressed adrenocortical function in rats [34]. Furthermore, it was reported by McKee and Finlay that cortisol replacement therapy in critically ill patients had dramatically reduced mortality [35]. The clinical studies that followed suit confirmed this toxicity, showing that patients receiving etomidate as an intraoperative hypnotic had a decreased postoperative cortisol response to adrenocorticotropic hormone [10, 36]. In patients receiving a single bolus of etomidate, adrenal suppression lasted 6–8 h [11, 37], and in patients receiving a continuous infusion, this could last more than 24 h [38]. This was because etomidate was found to be a far more potent inhibitor of the adrenocortical axis than it is as a hypnotic. Plasma concentrations greater than 200 ng/mL were needed for adequate hypnosis, but concentrations less than 10 ng/mL were associated with adrenal suppression [37]. After these findings, the clinical indication and use for etomidate were restricted to an anesthetic induction agent (single bolus only) in select patient groups with some academic publications even suggesting etomidate be removed from the clinic altogether [39, 40]. The mechanism behind this suppression was found to be the interaction of the imidazole ring of etomidate with the cytochrome P450 enzyme 11β-hydroxylase [10]. A high affinity interaction occurs between the basic nitrogen in this imidazole ring and the heme group, which the cytochrome P450 enzyme 11β-hydroxylase contains [26]. During clinical studies for ABP-700, no suppression of the adrenal axis was observed and plasma cortisol levels were similar to placebo values [23, 24].

Pain on Injection

Pain on injection is a common side effect of etomidate. The extent of the pain and the incidence seems to be dependent on the size of the vein in which etomidate is injected [17], but also on the formulation used. The lipid emulsion, containing medium-chain and long-chain triglycerides, of Etomidate-Lipuro (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) [41, 42] is associated with a smaller incidence of pain on injection than that of hypnomidate/amidate, which is a 95% propylene glycol/water formulation. The mechanism behind such pain on injection is hypothesized to be the activation of transient receptor potential ion channels in the sensory neurons [42, 43]. If the concentration of free aqueous etomidate is reduced, or by reducing osmolality, as is the case in lipid emulsions, transient receptor potential channel activation may also be reduced, thereby decreasing pain on injection. In clinical studies of ABP-700, pain on injection was also observed, but the incidence was relatively low, occurring in 2 out of 50 subjects after a bolus injection [24] and in 4 out of 25 subjects upon a continuous infusion of ABP-700 [23].

Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting

Postoperative nausea and vomiting are also associated with etomidate [7, 17], with incidences reported to be as high as 40%. However, later studies comparing the lipid emulsion of etomidate to propofol found no significant difference in the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting. This suggests that the emetogenicity of etomidate lies in the formulation, rather than the anesthetic itself [44].

ABP-700 also shows emetogenic properties, although the incidence is relatively moderate compared with etomidate. Upon a bolus study, two out of 50 subjects experienced post-operative nausea and vomiting [24], whereas during a continuous infusion, six out of 25 subjects experienced post-operative nausea and vomiting [23].

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics of Etomidate in Adults

The pharmacokinetics of etomidate has been mainly described in studies carried out in the late 1970s and in the early 1980s, prior to the discovery that etomidate leads to significant adrenal suppression. In the period following this discovery, studies on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of etomidate are scarce, the only exception being a limited population pharmacokinetic model developed by Kaneda et al. [45]. For an overview of these studies, the reader is directed to Table 1; their model parameters are provided in Table 2.

Table 1

Overview of published pharmacokinetic (PK) etomidate models in the adult population

Study (year)	Population	N (male/female)	Blood PK samples		Patient characteristics	Drug administration	Models
			No. of samples	Last sample	Age/weight/height
Van Hamme (1978) [48]	Eye or ear surgery patients	8 (5/3)	14; venous	10 h postoperatively	29 years (18–42) 75.3 kg (52.2–102.0)	Induction dose of 0.3 mg/kg	3-compartment model
De Ruiter (1981) [51]	General surgery patients	8 (6/2)	16; venous	10 h postoperatively	31 years (19–65) 70 kg (54–84)	Bolus dose of 0.22 mg/kg	3-compartment model
Fragen (1983) [49]	Minor surgical patients	11(6/5)	21; arterial	4 h postoperatively	34.5 years (19–54) 71.4 kg (50–98) 172.4 cm (152–193)	0.1 mg/kg/min for 3 min, 0.02 mg/kg/min for 27 min, 0.01 for rest of surgery (maximum 109 min)	3-compartment model
Hebron (1983) [50]	Patients with maxillofacial surgery	6 (3/3)	Not well described; “Blood samples were drawn from the intra-arterial cannula at frequent intervals for the first 2 h and at 4-hourly intervals thereafter”		22 years (15–38) 62.3 kg (51–98) 167 cm (160–189)	0.3 mg/kg followed by 1–25 µg/kg/min for approximately 48 h	3-compartment model
Schüttler (1985) [52]	Healthy volunteers	6 (5/1)	40–60; venous	Approximately 5 h post-infusion	25.5 years (± 1.9) 73.5 kg (± 15.8)	Microprocessor controlled infusion to achieve 3 consecutive increasing plasma concentrations of 0.05 µg/mL/min	2-compartment model
Arden (1986) [53]	Elective surgical patients	21 (20/1)	7 arterial, 7 venous	Arterial: 120 min, venous: 12 h after beginning of the infusion	56.7 years (22–82) 81.9 kg (11.5)	5–10 mg/min until “stage 3” of anesthesia	3-compartment model
Kaneda (2011) [45]	Healthy volunteers	18 (10/8)	Irregular; arterial	Awakening	38.9 years (± 8.5) 63.6 kg (± 8.2) 166.8 cm (± 5.8)	5 mg/min until loss of eyelash reflexes	2-compartment model with no significant influence of tested covariates

h hours, min minutes

Table 2

Etomidate pharmacokinetic model parameters [mean ± standard deviation or mean (standard error  %)]

Reference (year)	Model parameters	Remark
Van Hamme et al. (1978) [48]	Vc (L/kg): 0.310 ± 0.152 k10 (h−1): 2.774 ± 1.386 k12 (h−1): 10.079 ± 4.723 k21 (h−1): 5.464 ± 2.119 k13 (h−1): 3.459 ± 2.843 k31 (h−1): 0.453 ± 0.210
Fragen et al. (1983) [49]	Vc (L/kg): 0.15 ± 0.03 V2 (L/kg): 0.43 ± 0.12 V3 (L/kg): 1.94 ± 0.88 Cl1 (mL/min/kg): 17.9 ± 5.6 Cl2 (mL/min/kg): 25.1 ± 16.2 Cl3 (mL/min/kg): 5.7 ± 2.1
Hebron et al. (1983) [50]	Vc (L/kg): 0.155 k10 (h−1): 0.687 ± 0.089 k12 (h−1): 15.71 ± 1.63 k21 (h−1): 4.31 ± 1.02 k13 (h−1): 7.22 ± 0.97 k31 (h−1): 0.687 ± 0.089	Vc is not reported in the paper and was calculated as the sum of A, B, and C from the poly-exponential equation
De Ruiter et al. (1981) [51]	Vc (L/kg): not estimated in this study Vdarea (L/kg): 3.68 ± 0.66 Vdsteady state (L/kg): 2.16 ± 0.32 Cl1 (L/min): 0.879 t1/2α (min): 2.83 ± 2.35 t1/2β (min): 22.3 ± 10.4 t1/2γ (min): 208.8 ± 64.9	Model parameters based on both non-compartment and compartmental modeling
Schüttler et al. (1985) [52]	Vc (L): 49.7 ± 10.9 k10 (min−1): 0.036 ± 0.010 k12 (min−1): 0.053 ± 0.011 k21 (min−1): 0.020 ± 0.003
Arden et al. (1986) [53]	Vc (L/kg): 0.090 ± 0.027 Vdsteady state (L/kg): 4.7 ± 1.8 Cl1 (mL/min/kg): 18.3 ± 6.1 Cl2 (mL/min/kg): 25.5 ± 8.2 Cl3 (mL/min/kg): 18.8 ± 4.8 t1/2α (min): 0.93 ± 0.23 t1/2β (min): 12.1 ± 5.1 t1/2γ (min): 324 ± 162
Kaneda et al. (2011) [45]	Vc (L): 4.45 (7.4)a V2 (L): 74.9 (41.7)a Cl1 (L/min): 0.63 (88.9)a Cl2 (L/min): 3.16 (21.4)a
Lin et al. (2012) [56]	Vc = θVc.(age/4)−0.451.(WT/70) V2 = θV2. (WT/70) V3 = θV3. (age/4)−0.23. (WT/70) Cl1 = θCl1 (1 − (age − 4) 0.0288)∙(WT/70)0.75 Cl2 = θCl2∙(WT/70)0.75 Cl3 = θCl3∙(WT/70)0.75 Estimates are: Vc (L): 9.51 (10.4)a V2 (L): 11.0 (16.0)a V3 (L): 79.2 (11.0)a Cl1 (L/min): 1.50 (4.0)a Cl2 (L/min): 1.95 (10.6)a Cl3 (L/min): 1.23 (6.7)a	This is the full covariate model including allometric scaling
Su et al. [57]	Vc (L/70 kg): 8.07 (11.6)a V2 (L/70 kg): 22.8 (23.6)a Cl1 (L/min/70 kg): 0.466 (15.5)a Cl2 (L/min/70 kg): 0.289 (17.5)a
Shen et al. [58]	Vc = θVc∙(WT/70) V2 = θV2∙(WT/70) V3 = θV3∙(WT/70) Cl1 = θCl1∙0.733TOF. (WT/70)0.75 Cl2 = θCl2∙(WT/70)0.75 Cl3 = θCl3∙(WT/70)0.75 Estimates are: Vc (L): 8.07 (14)a V2 (L): 13.7 (11.4)a V3 (L): 41.9 (22.9)a Cl1 (L/min/): 1.31 (10.4)a Cl2 (L/min): 1.91 (12.5)a Cl3 (L/min): 0.322 (17.7)a TOF effect on Cl1 = 0.733 (12.9)a	This is the full covariate model including allometric scaling TOF = 0 and 1 for children with and without TOF

Cl1 clearance of the central compartment or elimination clearance, Cl2 clearance from the second compartment, Cl3 clearance from the third compartment, h hour, k, k, k, k, k intercompartmental distribution constants, min minutes, t rapid distribution half-life, t slow distribution half-life, t terminal elimination half-life, TOF tetralogy of Fallot, V2 volume of distribution of the second or fast equilibrating compartment, V3 volume of distribution of the third or slow equilibrating compartment, Vc central volume of distribution, WT represents weight (kg)

aMean (standard error  %)

Absorption

Etomidate is registered for intravenous use only. However, other routes of administration have been investigated, for sedative and/or anxiolytic purposes [21, 22]. Etomidate is reported to be well absorbed after oral transmucosal administration.

Distribution

Etomidate is 75% protein bound. In plasma, it binds solely to albumin [46]. Little is known about placental transfer of etomidate. A study in pregnant ewes showed that etomidate crosses the placenta rapidly, but a certain placental barrier of unknown etiology seems to limit its transfer [47]. The volumes of distribution of etomidate are relatively large, likely owing to its high solubility in fat, and seem to be related to body weight [48]. Depending on the number of compartments in the pharmacokinetic analysis, either two or three, volumes of distribution in steady state are reported to range from 0.15 to 4.7 L/kg [45, 48–53].

Metabolism/Elimination

Etomidate is metabolized to an inactive carboxylic acid metabolite [54]. This is primarily done by hepatic esterases, although it is thought that plasma esterases also play a small part in the hydrolyzation of etomidate. Reported hepatic extraction ratios range from 0.5 to 0.9 [48, 49]. The metabolite is excreted in urine and for a small part in bile. Less than 2% of etomidate is excreted unchanged [54]. An elimination half-life of 2.9–5.5 h is reported in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I/II patients [50, 51]. Reported systemic clearances are very variable, with a range from 9.9 mL/min/kg to 25.0 mL/min/kg [45, 50]. In elderly patients, smaller doses of etomidate are required because of reduced protein binding and reduced clearance. This is also the case in patients with renal failure or hepatic cirrhosis [53, 55].

Pharmacokinetics of Etomidate in Children

The pharmacokinetics of etomidate in the pediatric population is described for children aged over 6 months by Lin et al. [56] in patients who underwent elective surgery. Su et al. [57] and Shen et al. [58] focused on the pharmacokinetics of etomidate in neonates and infants aged younger than 12 months with congenital heart disease. For an overview of these studies, the reader is directed to Table 3; their model parameters are provided in Table 2. In the studies by Lin et al. and Su et al., etomidate was administered as a bolus of 0.3 mg/kg, after which anesthesia was maintained using a combination of volatile anesthetic agents and fentanyl [56, 57]. Shen et al. chose to administer etomidate at an infusion rate of 60 µg/kg/min until a bispectral index (BIS) of 50 was reached for 5 s. Maintenance of anesthesia was achieved here with a combination of the volatile anesthetic agent sevoflurane, intravenous anesthetic agent propofol, and the opioid sufentanil [58]. Lin et al. and Shen et al. found that a three-compartment model using allometric scaling best described the pharmacokinetics of etomidate, although the allometric model of Shen et al. was only slightly superior to their linear model [56, 58]. Conversely, Su et al. found that a two-compartment model with allometric scaling described the pharmacokinetics of etomidate best [57]. Lin et al., the only pediatric model studying patients aged older than 6 months, found that age was the most significant pharmacokinetic covariate, with a higher age resulting in a smaller (size-adjusted) clearance and volumes of distribution. Both Shen et al. and Su et al. studied the effect of cardiac anatomy and physiology on the pharmacokinetics of etomidate in neonates and infants. Su et al. found no effect of these covariates on their model performance. However, Shen et al. identified the occurrence of the tetralogy of Fallot as a covariate affecting mostly the clearance of etomidate, resulting in lower clearances compared with children with normal cardiac anatomy. There is a large variability in pharmacokinetic parameters found in these three studies. Lin et al. report almost a three-fold higher clearance than Su et al. Su et al. suggested that because Lin et al. mainly studied an older pediatric population, their model might be inappropriate to apply to neonatal and infant populations. As there are scarce data on the adult population pharmacokinetics, it is difficult to relate the findings in these three pediatric studies to pharmacokinetic properties of etomidate in adults.

Table 3

Overview of published pharmacokinetic (PK) etomidate models in the pediatric population

Study (year)	Population	N (male/female)	Blood PK samples		Patient characteristics	Drug administration	Tested covariates	Covariate models
			No. of samples	Last sample	Age/weight/heightMean (range) or (SD)
Lin (2012) [56]	Children aged older than 6 months; elective surgery	48 (29/19)	11; arterial	120 min after the start of the infusion	4.0 years (0.53–13.21) 15.7 kg (7.5–52) 103 cm (65–170)	0.3 mg/kg bolus within 15 s	Age and weight	3-compartmental model with weight on CL and V
Su (2015) [57]	Neonates and infants with congenital heart disease	20 (12/8)	>10; venous	Upon cardiopulmonary bypass	3.35 months (8 days to 11.74 months) 4.98 kg (2.5–8.35)	0.3 mg/kg bolus upon induction prior to surgery	Age, weight, effect of shunt	2-compartmental model with no significant influence of tested covariates
Shen (2016) [58]	Neonates/infants with unrepaired tetralogy of Fallot and normal cardiac anatomy	29 (17/12)	9–10; arterial	120 min after the start of the infusion	236 days (± 72) 7.7 kg (± 1.2)	60 µg/kg/min until BIS < 50	Age, sex, height, hemoglobin, hematocrit, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, total protein, prothrombin time	3-compartmental model with TOF on CL

BIS bispectral index, CL clearance, min minutes, s seconds, SD standard deviation, V volume of distribution, TOF Tetralogy of Fallot

Pharmacokinetics of ABP-700

The novel anesthetic agent and etomidate analog ABP-700 is rapidly hydrolyzed by non-specific esterases into pharmacologically inactive metabolite, CPM-acid, and ethanol [24]. The pharmacokinetics was recently described using a recirculatory model, with applied allometry [59]. Volumes of distribution were relatively small, indicating a small extent of accumulation, and clearance was rapid at 1.95 L/min for a 70-kg, 35-year-old male individual. This results in rapidly stabilizing drug concentrations and rapidly decreasing drug concentrations after stopping administration. The metabolite, CPM-acid has a comparatively low systemic clearance, of 0.769 L/min, which may result in high plasma concentrations with prolonged infusions, unlikely to have any clinical effect [59].

Pharmacodynamics

CNS

Hypnotic Action

Etomidate produces a swift onset of anesthesia. Following a single bolus of etomidate, loss of eyelash reflex occurs within 116 s and anesthetic-level electro-encephalographic activity as measured by the BIS reaching a value of 50, is observed within 150 s, regardless of dose. [60] A continuous infusion of 0.06 mg/kg/min of etomidate causes loss of consciousness within 6 min, which is faster than equipotent doses of other anesthetic agents, such as propofol [61]. ABP-700 demonstrates an even more rapid onset of action, with loss of consciousness almost occurring immediately after a bolus dose [24] and a dose-dependent loss of consciousness upon a continuous infusion [23].

Although clinical studies of etomidate are relatively scarce compared with for example propofol or isoflurane, the molecular pharmacology of etomidate is well understood [62]. Etomidate, like the barbiturates and propofol, produces its hypnotic effect by acting as a positive allosteric modulator of the GABAA receptor [63]. The GABAA receptor is the major inhibitory receptor in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) [64]. It solely binds to the β+/α-interface of the receptor [65, 66] and whilst most general anesthetics show little selectivity for the different GABAA receptor subtypes, etomidate selectively enhances the GABA response of receptors containing the β2 or β3 subunits [67]. The GABAA receptor produces its effect when it is activated by the matching neurotransmitter, GABA. The receptor undergoes a conformational change, allowing the center ion channel pore to open. This permits chloride ions to pass from the extracellular to the intracellular space, resulting in hyperpolarization of the neuron, inhibiting the activity of that particular cell [68].When anesthetic agents bind to a certain site somewhere on the receptor, it enhances the response of the receptor to GABA, thus enhancing the inhibiting effect on the CNS. At high concentrations, these anesthetics can directly activate the receptor opening [69]. These anesthetic agents are the positive allosteric modulators of the GABAA receptor. The mechanism behind and the extent of this enhancement depends on the anesthetic and its binding site on the GABAA receptor and is also dependent on the dose of the anesthetic [68]. ABP-700 is, as a second-generation analog of etomidate, also a positive allosteric modulator of the GABAA receptor, and binds to the same site on the GABAA receptor as etomidate [70].

Although the molecular effects of etomidate, and anesthetic agents in general, are mostly well understood, a lack of knowledge about the translation of the molecular effects of etomidate to the alteration of synaptic and neural functions and the production of the hypnotic effect still exists. This can be partly attributed to the fact that there is no generally accepted theory of the mechanism of unconsciousness [71]. In recent years, several brain areas that seem to be involved in the generation of consciousness, unconsciousness, sleep, and anesthesia have been identified. The reticular formation of the brainstem contains several sleep-promoting and wakefulness-promoting cholinergic and monoaminergic nuclei that affect higher cortical structures and whose activity and reciprocal influence changes, depending on the level of consciousness [72-74]. Wakefulness-promoting areas include the locus coeruleus, the dorsal raphe, pontis oralis, and the centromedial thalamus. Inactivation of some of these areas enhances anesthesia, whereas activation can enhance emergence from anesthesia. Sleep-promoting areas include the ventrolateral preoptic area. It has been reported that lesions in this area can increase the level of wakefulness [75]. High concentrations of anesthetic agents affect these nuclei and this might lead to clinical unconsciousness.

Another area that potentially plays a role in the mechanism behind anesthesia is the thalamus, responsible for information processing within the brain. Under general anesthesia with propofol, a decrease in cerebral blood flow, activity, and metabolism has been observed in this area. It is still unknown whether this observation is a cause or a consequence of the hypnotic action of anesthetic agents, although several theories and hypotheses have been published [76-80]. It has been established that the cerebral cortex is also a crucial effect target for anesthetic agents, as several studies have demonstrated a decrease in cortical activity and cerebral blood flow in this area during sedation and general anesthesia [81].

Combined PK-PD Modeling

Because of its restricted use as an anesthetic induction agent and the potential contamination of the BIS monitor by IMM [82], population combined PK-PD models of etomidate are scarce. Kaneda et al. [45] developed a sigmoid Emax model in which the EC50 value was 0.526 for BIS, with a γ of 2.25. The ke0 of etomidate was 0.447 per minute. However, the sample size was small at 18 healthy volunteers, and blood sampling times were irregular.

Valk et al. [59] recently developed a PK-PD model based on data gathered from 266 subjects who had received ABP-700. Where usually PK-PD models have a single (mathematical) effect side, i.e., production of anesthesia, Valk et al. found that in the pharmacodynamic model to describe BIS, a secondary effect site had to be incorporated that accounted for excitatory or disinhibitory activity to produce a good model fit. This secondary effect site acts in opposition to the primary effect site of BIS suppression, i.e., the production of anesthesia. The EC50 for BIS suppression was 1014 ng/mL, whereas the EC50 for excitation was 1230 ng/mL. The rapid onset of action of ABP-700 was underlined by the ke0 of 0.844/min [59].

IMM

One of the most pronounced side effects of both etomidate and analogs such as ABP-700 is the dose-dependent occurrence of IMM and/or myoclonus. These movements can range from mild movement of a single extremity to full-body twitching and myoclonus, which can potentially negatively affect the patient’s procedure. The incidence of these movements in etomidate is reported in some studies in non-premedicated patients to be 80%. This same incidence was observed during clinical trials in which non-premedicated healthy volunteers received ABP-700 [23, 24]. Several strategies have been studied to reduce the incidence of these movements. They can be reduced or prevented by pre-medication of the patients receiving etomidate with CNS depressant effects. These include opiates (fentanyl, remifentanil) [83-86], benzodiazepines [87, 88], dexmedetomidine [89, 90], thiopental [89], lidocaine [91], and magnesium [92]. Another strategy is a split-dose infusion of etomidate as a ‘primer dose’ [93, 94].

The origin of these movements is not yet clear; however, it is unlikely that they are of epileptogenic etiology [93]. Several clinical studies have studied the electroencephalogram (EEG) during administration of etomidate and have found that IMM do not coincide with epileptiform paroxysms [93, 95–97]. For ABP-700, no clinical “full-montage” EEG studies were performed so far. In toxicology studies in 14 Beagle dogs, in which supra-clinical doses of ABP-700 were administered, both IMM and seizures were observed. However, these phenomena were distinct temporally and eletroencephalographically. The seizures that were experienced by five out of 14 Beagle dogs occurred after the infusion of ABP-700 had been terminated. Conversely, the IMM that were experienced by all 14 dogs occurred during the infusion, during which no seizure activity was observed [98]. Further electrophysiological studies observed that high concentrations of the metabolite of ABP-700, CPM-acid, could produce inhibition of the GABAA receptor, a well-known mechanism of seizures. These concentrations were observed in the dogs, and thus it was concluded that these post-infusion seizures were most likely produced by the metabolite. The concentration of CPM-acid needed to cause inhibition of the GABAA receptor is about 100-fold higher than the highest concentration observed in clinical studies of ABP-700 [98]. Therefore, it is extremely unlikely that the healthy volunteers in these clinical studies experienced seizures based on high concentrations of CPM-acid, or that the IMM are of epileptogenic etiology. Further clinical studies using a full-montage EEG are necessary to definitively exclude a convulsive etiology of these IMM.

Doenicke et al. and Kugler et al. hypothesized that the origin of IMM observed in etomidate lies in a temporary disequilibrium of the drug at effect sites within the CNS [93]. This hypothesis postulates that low concentrations of an anesthetic drug depress inhibitory neuronal circuits earlier than the excitatory neuronal circuits. Possible explanations for this disequilibrium are differences in local cerebral blood flow or differences in affinity [96]. This is supported by the observations of several studies that CNS-depressing pre-treatment reduces the incidence of IMM (see before) and that higher dosages of etomidate and ABP-700 produce more IMM.

In the PK-PD model of ABP-700 developed by Valk et al., the secondary effect site mentioned previously was associated with a risk of occurrence of IMM. Lower values of EC50 of this disinhibitory effect site were observed in individuals who also experienced more severe IMM. The EC50 for this effect site was higher in individuals who received pre-medication with opioids or benzodiazepines [59] This observation supports the hypothesis by Doenicke et al. and Kugler et al. that an unsynchronized onset of drug effect exists at different effect sites within the CNS.

What then, in turn, might be the cause of this disequilibrium in drug effect? It is likely that on a molecular level, IMM are modulated by the GABAA receptor. McGrath et al. demonstrated that when the structure of etomidate is modified to eliminate its GABAA positive modulatory activity, IMM are no longer observed in rats [99]. Note that in the PK-PD model of Valk et al. there also seems to be an inter-individual variability in the susceptibility to IMM. There are several explanations for this inter-individuality that might also explain the disequilibrium in drug effect. One is that there is a difference in the distribution of GABAA receptor subtypes [69]. Because etomidate, and by extension ABP-700, binds very specifically on the GABAA receptor, different distribution of subtypes within the CNS might cause higher susceptibility to IMM. Another explanation could be that with etomidate and ABP-700 being rapid-onset drugs, there might be an inter-individual variability in drug distribution and/or metabolism [59].

Cardiovascular Effects

A major advantage of etomidate compared with other anesthetic agents is that it preserves cardiovascular stability. It typically does not cause significant hypotension upon induction of anesthesia at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg. This is because etomidate does not significantly inhibit sympathetic tone and preserves autonomic reflexes, such as the baroreflex [100]. It is thought that etomidate has this property because it acts as an agonist at the α2-adrenoceptors, in particular the α2B-adrenoreceptor responsible for the peripheral vasoconstrictive response to hypotensive effects [101]. In healthy patients, multiple studies show that anesthetic induction doses of etomidate cause minimal changes in heart rate (< 10%), preserving other hemodynamic parameters such as central venous pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac index, and systemic vascular resistance [2, 5, 102–104]. This beneficial cardiovascular profile makes etomidate a suitable anesthetic induction agent for patients who are hemodynamically unstable or who have cardiac disease. In patients with valvular heart disease or coronary artery disease, anesthetic induction doses of etomidate have a minimal effect on hemodynamic parameters [103, 105]. Myocardial contractility and myocardial oxygen supply-to-demand ratio are not impaired by etomidate [106]. Because of the preservation of sympathetic tone and autonomic reflexes and the lack of analgesic action, responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are not blunted by etomidate. This can lead to an increase in arterial pressure and heart rate. In a direct BIS-guided comparison between propofol and etomidate in 46 ASA class III patients, etomidate was associated with a higher incidence in hypertension, a higher cardiac index, and a higher heart rate after intubation stimulus, whereas propofol was associated with a higher incidence of hypotension [107]. To obtain a satisfactory blunting of sympathetic response, an adequate management of opioid co-administration is needed. The relative cardiovascular stability of etomidate makes it a suitable anesthetic induction agent to use in the setting of hemorrhagic shock. Several animal models of hemorrhagic shock show that etomidate has a favorable impact on the cardiovascular system in a state of hypovolemia, decreasing mean arterial pressure and heart rate, and increasing systemic vascular resistance. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of etomidate are barely impacted by hemorrhagic shock [108, 109].

Like etomidate, ABP-700 maintains cardiovascular stability. Studies in human volunteers showed that especially in higher dosages, ABP-700 is associated with an increase in systolic blood pressure, whilst maintaining diastolic blood pressure, and an increase in heart rate [23, 24]. These phenomena occurred without laryngoscopy or endotracheal intubation triggers. However, higher ABP-700 dosages were also associated with ‘excitatory’ phenomena such as IMM. As such, it is possible that this cardiovascular hyperdynamic is caused by a general excitatory state.

Respiratory Effects

Compared with other anesthetics, such as propofol and barbiturates, etomidate has a smaller impact on the respiratory system. After induction of anesthesia with etomidate at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg, a short period of hyperventilation occurs. Several studies in patients reported a brief period of apnea [110, 111], with a mean duration of 20 s [17]. These apnea periods result in a change in PaCO2 of ± 15% and have no significant effect on PaO2 [105]. The occurrence of apnea following anesthetic induction doses of etomidate also seem to depend on the type of premedication applied prior to etomidate administration. Compared with methohexital, etomidate causes a less pronounced depression of ventilatory response to CO2 [111]. No histamine release occurs upon administration of etomidate [112, 113].

ABP-700 has a respiratory profile that is similar to that of etomidate. In the more than 350 volunteers who received ABP-700, only short-lasting episodes of apnea occurred and none was clinically relevant [23, 24, 59]. Ventilatory frequency was higher in subjects receiving ABP-700 compared with control groups receiving placebo and propofol. However, PaCO2 did not change significantly.

Special Populations

Critically Ill Patients

Because of its relatively stable cardiovascular profile, etomidate is sometimes used as an anesthetic induction agent in critically ill patients. As mentioned previously, etomidate causes suppression of the adrenal axis, which caused it to be no longer used for the maintenance of anesthesia or sedation. The use of a single dose of etomidate in critically ill patients, however, is also controversial [114, 115]. Conflicting evidence about the potential benefits of etomidate vs its potential detriments in this particular patient group exists in the literature. Studies investigating the relationship between the duration of adrenal insufficiency after a single dose of etomidate and the general outcome reported that adrenal suppression after etomidate administration lasts longer than 24 h [116]. The clinical impact of this adrenal suppression, however, is currently unclear [117]. Concerns about the adrenal toxicity of etomidate in critically ill patients reemerged in the early 2000s after exposure to a single dose of etomidate was found to be a confounding variable in a large multicenter trial studying the effect of corticosteroid replacement therapy in patients with sepsis with relative adrenal insufficiency [118]. In this study, of the 70 patients receiving a single dose of etomidate, 68 did not respond adequately to corticosteroid replacement therapy [119]. In a follow-up study in 477 patients with severe sepsis, the Corticosteroid Therapy of Septic Shock (CORTICUS) study, a single dose of etomidate was associated with a 60% non-response rate to corticosteroid replacement therapy, which was significantly higher than the non-response rate of patients who did not receive etomidate [120, 121]. Retrospective studies of the CORTICUS cohort suggested that etomidate was also associated with a worse outcome, as the 28-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who had received etomidate [120-122]. Conversely, a large prospective study on the effect of etomidate on the mortality and hospital length of stay of patients with sepsis could not identify a significant increase of both endpoints in patients who received etomidate vs those who did not [123]. In critically ill patients without sepsis, a consensus about the clinical effect of the adrenal suppression of a single dose of etomidate also does not exist. Hildreth et al. and Komatsu et al. both reported an increased length of stay after induction of anesthesia with etomidate in trauma patients and ASA class III and IV patients, respectively [124, 125]. Meanwhile other studies did not find significant differences in outcomes in emergency patients [126, 127]. Currently, alternative anesthetic induction agents, such as ketamine, are being studied and found to be a viable alternative to etomidate [126, 128–130]. However, large clinical trials are needed to define the clinical impact of a single dose of etomidate in critically ill patients, both with and without sepsis [62].

Pediatrics

In children, etomidate is generally safe as an induction agent [20]. Similar to the adult population, a single induction dose of etomidate also suppresses the adrenal axis in children [131, 132] and etomidate is not suitable for prolonged infusion. Etomidate in children is mainly used in the emergency department [133-135] and in children with congenital heart disease [57, 58, 136, 137]. For the pharmacokinetics of etomidate in children, see Sect. 6.3.

Elderly Patients

Increasing age seems to affect the pharmacokinetic profile of etomidate. In a study conducted by Arden et al. [53], etomidate doses required to achieve a certain EEG endpoint were significantly lower in elderly patients. This appears to be mostly caused by a change in pharmacokinetics with increasing age, such as a decrease in initial volume distribution and clearance, rather than a change in brain sensitivity. The decrease in initial distribution volume with increasing age implies that elderly patients are exposed to a higher initial etomidate blood concentration. Combined with a decrease in clearance in elderly patients, this can explain the reduction in required dose of etomidate [53].

Larsen et al. [106] compared the cardiovascular and myocardial effects of propofol and etomidate in elderly patients. They showed that both propofol and etomidate decrease blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac index to the same extent. However, sympathetic responses to endotracheal intubation were much more blunted with propofol, with patients receiving etomidate showing a marked increase in arterial pressure. Therefore, although both drugs should be used with caution in fragile patients, propofol is slightly preferred by Larsen et al.

More recent studies compared etomidate to propofol in combination with either remifentanil or midazolam in elderly patients during endoscopy [138, 139]. In a large study by Shen et al., etomidate-remifentanil was compared with propofol-remifentanil. It was found that etomidate-remifentanil had a more stable hemodynamic profile than propofol-remifentanil. Although the incidence of myoclonus was higher in the etomidate group, this comprised a small group of 4.5% [138]. Lee et al. also reported that etomidate-midazolam was associated with fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events than propofol-midazolam in elderly patients undergoing a colonoscopy. However, etomidate-midazolam caused markedly more movement of the patients, disturbing the procedure [139]. Therefore, Lee recommends propofol-midazolam to be used in relatively healthy elderly patients and etomidate-midazolam.

Renally/Hepatically Impaired Patients

In general, the behavior of etomidate in renally and hepatically impaired patients is not well known. In patients with liver cirrhosis, etomidate clearance is not changed compared to non-cirrhotic patients. However, volumes of distribution and elimination half-life are significantly larger [140]. This appears to be due to a reduced plasma protein binding of etomidate in the presence of liver cirrhosis, as is also the case with renal failure.

Song et al. reported that in patients with obstructive jaundice, etomidate requirements are decreased compared with controls, with a negative correlation observed between total bilirubin and etomidate requirements [141]. It is hypothesized that this effect is caused by an enhancement of GABA synaptic transmission by bilirubin [142]. However, obstructive jaundice did not affect propofol requirement in a similar study by Song et al. [143]. Song et al. hypothesized that this can be explained by the specific binding of etomidate to the GABAA receptor, whereas propofol also acts on other receptors. Additionally, propofol can also be metabolized extrahepatically, whereas etomidate metabolism solely takes place in the liver [141].

Electroconvulsive Therapy

Etomidate is frequently used as a hypnotic drug for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Electroconvulsive therapy is a treatment in which seizures are electrically induced to treat selected psychiatric diseases in patients who do not respond sufficiently to pharmacotherapy. Most anesthetic agents possess anticonvulsant properties and therefore increase the threshold for the seizure induction and inhibit the spread of the seizure, thereby counteracting the effect of ECT [144]. Although etomidate also acts as an anticonvulsant, hypnotic doses have a minimal effect on the duration of ECT-induced seizures compared to equipotent doses of other anesthetic agents such as propofol, methohexital, or thiopental [144-147]. The relationship of the duration of ECT-induced seizures and etomidate does not seem to be dose dependent [148]. Of note is that in recent years, the relevance of the quality, rather than the quantity (i.e., duration), of the induced seizure is increasingly thought to determine its therapeutic efficacy [149].

Hypercortisolism

The adrenal suppression that is caused by etomidate has made it a useful drug in the treatment of Cushing’s syndrome. A review by Preda et al. describing the studies and case reports in which etomidate was used in the management of severe Cushing’s syndrome suggested that low doses of etomidate should be used in critically ill patients who needed a swift control of cortisol levels and where the only possible route of administration was parenteral. However, intensive care monitoring is necessary, as is regular control of serum cortisol levels [150]. Subsequent studies confirmed this suggestion [151]. Recent studies in patients with Cushing’s syndrome who did not require intensive care unit monitoring suggested that they also might benefit from low doses of etomidate [152]. To retain the inhibition of steroidogenesis produced by etomidate, but abolish its hypnotic action, analogs of etomidate are currently being designed and investigated [99, 153].

Future Perspectives

Another novel etomidate analog currently in the pre-clinical stage of development is ET-26 hydrochloride. In vivo, ET-26 hydrochloride has stable hemodynamics and an anesthetic profile similar to etomidate [14, 154]. Adrenocortical suppression is reported to be less than with etomidate and in an in vivo sepsis model, it is virtually non-existent, with rats having a higher survival rate with ET-26 hydrochloride than with etomidate [155]. Pre-clinical pharmacologic studies showed that metabolism mainly takes place in the liver with hydroxylation being the main mechanism. It is excreted mostly through the kidney. Distribution is shown to be rapid [156, 157]. No clinical trials were found to be registered as of September 2020, but apparently, it is ready to be studied in a phase I clinical trial [157].

While the development of ABP-700 was discontinued by The Medicines Company in 2017, it was restarted in 2020 with funding by Mass General Brigham (Boston, MA, USA), the assembly of an ABP-700 development team, and a Pre-IND submission to the US Food and Drug Administration (personal communication, D. Raines, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, 15 February, 2021).

Conclusions

Etomidate is a GABAA receptor agonist that is used for the induction of anesthesia. It has favorable hemodynamic and respiratory properties in that it does not produce cardiovascular or respiratory depression. However, it causes suppression of the adrenal axis and is therefore not suitable for prolonged infusions. The pharmacokinetic properties of etomidate are not recently described, as most pharmacokinetic studies were performed almost 40–50 years ago. These report that etomidate is metabolized by hepatic esterases, which causes hydrolysis into a carboxylic acid and methanol. Clearance and initial volume of distribution decrease with age. Despite etomidate being on the market for almost 50 years, few well-designed population pharmacokinetic models currently exist, and even fewer combined PK-PD models. This is probably in part because of the occurrence of adrenocortical suppression and in part because of the limited clinical use of etomidate as a bolus-only agent. A well-designed population PK-PD model is warranted to identify relevant covariates and optimize dosing of etomidate in various patient groups. To retain the beneficial hemodynamic and respiratory profile of etomidate but eliminate its adrenocortical suppressive effects, analogs of etomidate have been developed. One of them, ABP-700, is under clinical development. It has a pharmacokinetic profile similar to etomidate, but with smaller volumes of distribution and a rapid clearance. Another analog of etomidate currently in pre-clinical development is ET-26 hydrochloride.

One of the most striking adverse effects of both etomidate and its analog ABP-700 is the occurrence of IMM. The origin of these movements is not yet clear, although it does not seem to be an epileptogenic one. More likely is the hypothesis that these are the result of fast pharmacokinetic properties and a disequilibrium between several cortical structures. More research is needed to identify the mechanism behind these movements.

Etomidate is a γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonist used for the induction of anesthesia and is well known for its stable cardiorespiratory profile and its adrenal toxicity.

Recent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of etomidate are scarce.

Analogs of etomidate were developed over the last decade to improve upon the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of etomidate.

A recurrent side effect of etomidate and its analog ABP-700 is the occurrence of involuntary muscle movements, the origin of which requires further research.