Literature DB >> 11573524

Biphasic EEG changes in relation to loss of consciousness during induction with thiopental, propofol, etomidate, midazolam or sevoflurane.

K Kuizenga1, J M Wierda, C J Kalkman.   

Abstract

The time course of four EEG effect variables, amplitude in the 2-5 Hz and in the 11-15 Hz band, spectral edge frequency 95% (SEF95), and bispectral index (BIS), in response to increasing concentrations of thiopental, propofol, etomidate, midazolam, or sevoflurane during a 10 min induction of anaesthesia was studied in 25 patients to determine the existence of a biphasic effect and to study the relationship of the EEG effect to the moment of loss of consciousness. A biphasic effect, that is, an initial increase of the effect variable followed by a decrease at higher concentrations, during the transition from consciousness to unconsciousness was found in EEG amplitude (both frequency bands) and in SEF95 for all anaesthetics except midazolam. There was a concentration-related decrease in BIS for all anaesthetics. There was no consistent relationship between the time of occurrence of the peak EEG effect, or the value of the EEG variable and the moment of loss of consciousness. With rapidly changing drug concentrations during the induction of anaesthesia, none of these EEG effect variables could be correlated to the moment of loss of consciousness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11573524     DOI: 10.1093/bja/86.3.354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  30 in total

1.  Correlation of Narcotrend Index, entropy measures, and spectral parameters with calculated propofol effect-site concentrations during induction of propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia.

Authors:  Ulrich Grouven; Frank A Beger; Barbara Schultz; Arthur Schultz
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Delta waves differently modulate high frequency components of EEG oscillations in various unconsciousness levels.

Authors:  Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Lotfi Senhadji; Mohammad-Bagher Shamsollahi; Eric Wodey; Bijan Vosoughi-Vahdat
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

Review 3.  General anesthetics and molecular mechanisms of unconsciousness.

Authors:  Stuart A Forman; Victor A Chin
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2008

4.  Effects of the anesthetic agent propofol on neural populations.

Authors:  Axel Hutt; Andre Longtin
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Electroencephalographic response following midazolam-induced general anesthesia: relationship to plasma and effect-site midazolam concentrations.

Authors:  Wakako Miyake; Yutaka Oda; Yuko Ikeda; Satoshi Hagihira; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Akira Asada
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Bispectral index monitoring of sedation depth in pediatric dental patients.

Authors:  Christel M Haberland; Suher Baker; Haibei Liu
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2011

7.  State-Dependent Cortical Unit Activity Reflects Dynamic Brain State Transitions in Anesthesia.

Authors:  Heonsoo Lee; Shiyong Wang; Anthony G Hudetz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Noise-induced precursors of state transitions in the stochastic Wilson-cowan model.

Authors:  Ehsan Negahbani; D Alistair Steyn-Ross; Moira L Steyn-Ross; Marcus T Wilson; Jamie W Sleigh
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.300

9.  Increased electroencephalographic gamma activity reveals awakening from isoflurane anaesthesia in rats.

Authors:  J Kortelainen; X Jia; T Seppänen; N Thakor
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Modeling the GABAergic action of etomidate on the thalamocortical system.

Authors:  Jason A Talavera; Steven K Esser; Florin Amzica; Sean Hill; Joseph F Antognini
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.