Literature DB >> 9731608

Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

J V Escudero1, J Sancho, D Bautista, M Escudero, J López-Trigo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The early prognostic application of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) for assessing motor and functional recovery in ischemic stroke patients has yielded contradictory results. We performed a prospective study of patients with acute ischemic stroke and motor deficit to evaluate the early prognostic value of TMS in motor and functional recovery.
METHODS: Fifty patients with different degrees of hemiparesis were studied in the first week after ischemic stroke and evaluated by clinical scales (Medical Research Council Scale, Canadian Neurological Scale, Barthel Index), with clinical follow-up over 6 months. TMS (Magstim 200) was performed at the same time, recording the motor evoked potential (MEP) in the thenar eminence muscles, with facilitation by voluntary contraction.
RESULTS: Of the total group of 50 patients, MEP was absent in 20 and present in 30 (17 with normal and 13 with delayed central conduction time [CCT]). The patients with MEP showed better motor and functional recovery than those without. The MEP provided information on patient recovery, regardless of the initial strength and/or Barthel values. The degree of recovery was better in those patients with normal CCT than in those with delayed CCT.
CONCLUSIONS: MEP obtained by TMS in patients with hemiparesis after acute ischemic stroke is useful as an early prognostic indicator of motor and functional recovery. This technique would allow the early identification of those patients who will have a good recovery, particularly among those with severe initial paresis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9731608     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.29.9.1854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  43 in total

1.  Protein ubiquitination in postsynaptic densities after transient cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Chen Li Liu; Maryann E Martone; Bingren R Hu
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 2.  Brain-mapping techniques for evaluating poststroke recovery and rehabilitation: a review.

Authors:  James C Eliassen; Erin L Boespflug; Martine Lamy; Jane Allendorfer; Wen-Jang Chu; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.119

3.  Differential Poststroke Motor Recovery in an Arm Versus Hand Muscle in the Absence of Motor Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Jing Xu; Meret Branscheidt; Martin Lindquist; Jasim Uddin; Levke Steiner; Benjamin Hertler; Nathan Kim; Jessica Berard; Michelle D Harran; Juan C Cortes; Tomoko Kitago; Andreas Luft; John W Krakauer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Individual Differences in Resting Corticospinal Excitability Are Correlated with Reaction Time and GABA Content in Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Maedbh King; Sean Noah; Richard J Maddock; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke − a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jan Pawel Bembenek; Katarzyna Kurczych; Michal Karli Nski; Anna Czlonkowska
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

Review 6.  Imaging motor recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Nuray Yozbatiran; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

Review 7.  Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.829

8.  Visual Attention Affects the Amplitude of the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-associated Motor-evoked Potential: A Preliminary Study With Clinical Utility.

Authors:  Spencer J Bell; Abigail Lauer; Daniel H Lench; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.325

9.  Corticospinal tract lesion load: An imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes.

Authors:  Wuwei Feng; Jasmine Wang; Pratik Y Chhatbar; Christopher Doughty; Douglas Landsittel; Vasileios-Arsenios Lioutas; Steven A Kautz; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 10.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of functional recovery mechanisms after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.