Literature DB >> 34059778

A nomogram based on clinicopathological features and serological indicators predicting breast pathologic complete response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Yijun Li1, Jian Zhang1, Bin Wang1, Huimin Zhang1, Jianjun He2, Ke Wang3.   

Abstract

A single tumor marker is not enough to predict the breast pathologic complete response (bpCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. We aimed to establish a nomogram based on multiple clinicopathological features and routine serological indicators to predict bpCR after NAC in breast cancer patients. Data on clinical factors and laboratory indices of 130 breast cancer patients who underwent NAC and surgery in First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from July 2017 to July 2019 were collected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified 11 independent indicators: body mass index, carbohydrate antigen 125, total protein, blood urea nitrogen, cystatin C, serum potassium, serum phosphorus, platelet distribution width, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, and hepatitis B surface antibodies. The nomogram was established based on these indicators. The 1000 bootstrap resampling internal verification calibration curve and the GiViTI calibration belt showed that the model was well calibrated. The Brier score of 0.095 indicated that the nomogram had a high accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.941 (95% confidence interval: 0.900-0.982) showed good discrimination of the model. In conclusion, this nomogram showed high accuracy and specificity and did not increase the economic burden of patients, thereby having a high clinical application value.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34059778     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91049-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  43 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Nicholas Pavlidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  A D Barker; C C Sigman; G J Kelloff; N M Hylton; D A Berry; L J Esserman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic therapy for operable breast cancer: equivalent outcomes?

Authors:  Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  I-SPY 2--A Glimpse of the Future of Phase 2 Drug Development?

Authors:  David Harrington; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Radiomics of Multiparametric MRI for Pretreatment Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Zhenyu Liu; Zhuolin Li; Jinrong Qu; Renzhi Zhang; Xuezhi Zhou; Longfei Li; Kai Sun; Zhenchao Tang; Hui Jiang; Hailiang Li; Qianqian Xiong; Yingying Ding; Xinming Zhao; Kun Wang; Zaiyi Liu; Jie Tian
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  A four-gene signature predicts the efficacy of paclitaxel-based neoadjuvant therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Ye Zhang; Zhe Zhang; Zhenkun Zhao; Qingjie Lv
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 7.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Neoadjuvant therapy as a platform for drug development and approval in breast cancer.

Authors:  Aditya Bardia; José Baselga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Predictive Significance of p53, Ki-67, and Bcl-2 Expression for Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Taeryung Kim; Wonshik Han; Min Kyoon Kim; Jun Woo Lee; Jisun Kim; Soo Kyung Ahn; Han-Byoel Lee; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Kyung-Hun Lee; Tae-Yong Kim; Sae-Won Han; Seock-Ah Im; In Ae Park; Ju-Yeon Kim; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Histomorphological Factors Predicting the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yoon Yang Jung; Chang Lim Hyun; Min-Sun Jin; In Ae Park; Yul Ri Chung; Bobae Shim; Kyu Ho Lee; Han Suk Ryu
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.