Literature DB >> 24298066

Neoadjuvant therapy as a platform for drug development and approval in breast cancer.

Aditya Bardia1, José Baselga.   

Abstract

The traditional drug development process in breast cancer based on large phase III studies has serious limitations and needs a major overhaul. Searching for new approaches, the testing of novel agents in the preoperative (neoadjuvant) setting approach offers a potentially rapid and efficient strategy for drug development utilizing pathologic complete response (path CR), a surrogate marker for survival, as the primary endpoint. In addition, neoadjuvant studies allow the assessment of drug effects on the target (pharmacodynamic response) and the development of predictive biomarkers of response. Molecular profiling of the residual tumor in the surgical specimen may also provide insights into actionable mechanisms of resistance. Recognizing the potential of neoadjuvant trials for drug development, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently announced consideration of neoadjuvant trials for accelerated drug approval in early breast cancer, particularly for tumors with high risk of recurrence and unfavorable prognosis, and provided accelerated approval to neoadjuvant pertuzumab in September 2013. The FDA has emphasized that while improvement in path CR could be utilized for "accelerated" approval, improvement in survival will still need to be demonstrated for "regular" approval. Key considerations in conduct of such neoadjuvant drug development trials include (i) study design such as utilization of biomarker stratified design to evaluate a biomarker that could enrich response, (ii) definition of path CR, (iii) distribution of factors that influence path CR between the treatment arms, (iv) prespecified plan for follow-up to obtain data on survival, and (v) safety as it involves a patient population with curable disease. In the years to come, we anticipate an increase in the number of neoadjuvant trials testing novel therapies that hopefully will open a new path in bringing efficacious new therapies to patients with breast cancer. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24298066     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  34 in total

1.  Effect of Body Mass Index- and Actual Weight-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Doses on Pathologic Complete Response in Operable Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rachna Raman; Sarah L Mott; Mary C Schroeder; Sneha Phadke; Jad El Masri; Alexandra Thomas
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  ERBB receptors: from oncogene discovery to basic science to mechanism-based cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Carlos L Arteaga; Jeffrey A Engelman
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the early prediction of pathological response in aggressive subtypes of breast cancer: review of the literature and recommendations for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  David Groheux; David Mankoff; Marc Espié; Elif Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Therapeutic targeting of ERBB2 in breast cancer: understanding resistance in the laboratory and combating it in the clinic.

Authors:  Alessandra Fabi; Marcella Mottolese; Oreste Segatto
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Ultrasound-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography for Predicting and Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancers: Recent Progress.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Hamed Vavadi; Alex Merkulov; Hai Li; Mohsen Erfanzadeh; Atahar Mostafa; Yanping Gong; Hassan Salehi; Susan Tannenbaum; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Disease extent at secondary cytoreductive surgery is predictive of progression-free and overall survival in advanced stage ovarian cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Peter G Rose; James J Java; Mark A Morgan; Angeles Alvarez-Secord; Joshua P Kesterson; Frederick B Stehman; David P Warshal; William T Creasman; Parviz Hanjani; Robert T Morris; Larry J Copeland
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Can immunity to breast cancer eliminate residual micrometastases?

Authors:  Mary L Disis; Sasha E Stanton
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Impact on Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura M Spring; Geoffrey Fell; Andrea Arfe; Lorenzo Trippa; Aditya Bardia; Chandni Sharma; Rachel Greenup; Kerry L Reynolds; Barbara L Smith; Brian Alexander; Beverly Moy; Steven J Isakoff; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Effectiveness and tolerability of neoadjuvant pertuzumab-containing regimens for HER2-positive localized breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Spring; Andrzej Niemierko; Stephanie Haddad; Megan Yuen; Amy Comander; Kerry Reynolds; Jennifer Shin; Atul Bahn; Elena Brachtel; Michelle Specht; Barbara L Smith; Alphonse Taghian; Rachel Jimenez; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Steven J Isakoff; Beverly Moy; Aditya Bardia
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  A phase I study of an oral selective gamma secretase (GS) inhibitor RO4929097 in combination with neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Sagar Sardesai; Mohamed Badawi; Ewa Mrozek; Evan Morgan; Mitch Phelps; Julie Stephens; Lai Wei; Mahmoud Kassem; Yonghua Ling; Maryam Lustberg; Daniel Stover; Nicole Williams; Rachel Layman; Raquel Reinbolt; Jeffrey VanDeusen; Mathew Cherian; Michael Grever; William Carson; Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy; Robert Wesolowski
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.