| Literature DB >> 27721875 |
Yoon Yang Jung1, Chang Lim Hyun2, Min-Sun Jin3, In Ae Park4, Yul Ri Chung4, Bobae Shim4, Kyu Ho Lee4, Han Suk Ryu4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is no standard targeted therapy for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Therefore, its management heavily depends on adjuvant chemotherapy. Using core needle biopsy, this study evaluated the histological factors of TNBC predicting the response to chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Core needle biopsy; Neoadjuvant therapy; Treatment outcome; Triple-negative breast neoplasms
Year: 2016 PMID: 27721875 PMCID: PMC5053310 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Breast Cancer ISSN: 1738-6756 Impact factor: 3.588
Figure 1Representative microphotographs of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) according to TIL grade (H&E stain, ×200). (A) None; almost no lymphocytes are present. (B) Mild; only a few lymphocytes infiltrate the tumor stroma. (C) Moderate; moderate lymphocytic infiltration in the stroma. (D) Severe; dense infiltration of lymphocytes surrounding the tumor nests.
Figure 2Representative histopathologic parameters. (A) Peritumoral tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL); the lymphocytes surrounding the peripheral tumor border. The border between the tumor nests and the inner stroma is demarcated by the black line, and lymphocytes in the stroma surrounded by the line are considered to be stromal TIL (H&E stain, ×200). (B) The left half of the core biopsy specimen is totally necrotized. Diffuse necrosis (H&E stain, ×100). (C) Tumor cells with clear cytoplasm (H&E stain, ×400).
Univariate analysis of pathologic complete response and clinicopathologic parameters
| Variable | pCR (n = 66), No. (%) | Non-pCR (n = 77), No. (%) | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr)* | 46.26 ± 9.81 | 43.83 ± 10.03 | 1.025 | 0.991–1.060 | 0.148 |
| cT stage | 0.038 | ||||
| 1, 2 | 48 (72.7) | 43 (55.8) | 1 | ||
| 3 | 18 (27.3) | 34 (44.2) | 0.474 | 0.235–0.959 | |
| Histologic grade | 0.002 | ||||
| II | 29 (37.7) | 42 (63.6) | 1 | ||
| III | 48 (62.3) | 24 (36.4) | 2.897 | 1.466–5.724 | |
| Mitotic count (/10HPF)* | 17.61 ± 17.30 | 19.30 ± 14.49 | 0.993 | 0.972–1.014 | 0.523 |
| TIL (%)† | 0.029 | ||||
| None | 16 (24.2) | 28 (36.4) | 1 | ||
| Mild | 7 (10.6) | 18 (23.4) | 0.681 | 0.234–1.979 | |
| Moderate | 17 (25.8) | 12 (15.6) | 2.479 | 0.948–6.481 | |
| Severe | 26 (39.4) | 19 (24.7) | 2.395 | 1.021–5.618 | |
| TIL (dichotomized) | 0.003 | ||||
| Low | 23 (34.8) | 46 (59.7) | 1 | ||
| High | 43 (65.2) | 31 (40.3) | 2.774 | 1.404–5.481 | |
| TIL location | 0.028 | ||||
| Peritumoral | 23 (34.8) | 41 (53.2) | 1 | ||
| Intratumoral | 43 (65.2) | 36 (46.8) | 2.129 | 1.083–4.185 | |
| Necrosis | 0.001 | ||||
| Low | 50 (75.8) | 36 (46.8) | 1 | ||
| High | 16 (24.2) | 41 (53.2) | 0.281 | 0.137–0.577 | |
| Clear cytoplasm | 0.009 | ||||
| Absent | 42 (63.6) | 32 (41.6) | 1 | ||
| Present | 24 (36.4) | 45 (58.4) | 0.406 | 0.207–0.799 | |
| Retraction artifact | 0.431 | ||||
| Absent | 44 (66.7) | 56 (72.7) | 1 | ||
| Present | 22 (33.3) | 21 (27.3) | 1.333 | 0.651–2.730 | |
| Small cell-like feature | 0.673 | ||||
| Absent | 45 (68.2) | 55 (71.4) | 1 | ||
| Present | 21 (31.8) | 22 (28.6) | 1.167 | 0.570–2.387 | |
| DCIS component | 0.710 | ||||
| Absent | 56 (84.8) | 67 (87.0) | 1 | ||
| Present | 10 (15.2) | 10 (13.0) | 1.196 | 0.465–3.080 | |
| Fat invasion | 0.130 | ||||
| Absent | 42 (63.6) | 58 (75.3) | 1 | ||
| Present | 24 (36.4) | 19 (24.7) | 1.744 | 0.848–3.588 | |
| Lymphocytes in normal glands | 0.604 | ||||
| Absent | 28 (42.4) | 36 (46.8) | 1 | ||
| Present | 38 (57.6) | 41 (53.2) | 1.192 | 0.614–2.311 |
pCR=pathologic complete response; OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; cT stage=clinical T stage; HPF=high-power field; TIL=tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; DCIS=ductal carcinoma in situ.
*Mean±SD; †None, 0%; mild, <30%; moderate, 30%–60%; and severe, >60%.
Multivariate analysis of pathologic complete response and clinicopathologic parameters
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cT stage | 0.473 | 0.200–1.122 | 0.089 |
| Histological grade | 2.458 | 1.047–5.774 | 0.039 |
| TIL | 3.484 | 1.407–8.627 | 0.007 |
| Necrosis | 0.359 | 0.154–0.838 | 0.018 |
| Clear cytoplasm | 0.305 | 0.126–0.736 | 0.008 |
OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; cT stage=clinical T stage; TIL=tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristics analysis for prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. AUC=area under the curve.