Literature DB >> 34059718

Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness.

Ambrus Zelei1,2, John Milton3, Gabor Stepan1,4, Tamas Insperger5,6.   

Abstract

Postural sway is a result of a complex action-reaction feedback mechanism generated by the interplay between the environment, the sensory perception, the neural system and the musculation. Postural oscillations are complex, possibly even chaotic. Therefore fitting deterministic models on measured time signals is ambiguous. Here we analyse the response to large enough perturbations during quiet standing such that the resulting responses can clearly be distinguished from the local postural sway. Measurements show that typical responses very closely resemble those of a critically damped oscillator. The recovery dynamics are modelled by an inverted pendulum subject to delayed state feedback and is described in the space of the control parameters. We hypothesize that the control gains are tuned such that (H1) the response is at the border of oscillatory and nonoscillatory motion similarly to the critically damped oscillator; (H2) the response is the fastest possible; (H3) the response is a result of a combined optimization of fast response and robustness to sensory perturbations. Parameter fitting shows that H1 and H3 are accepted while H2 is rejected. Thus, the responses of human postural balance to "large" perturbations matches a delayed feedback mechanism that is optimized for a combination of performance and robustness.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34059718     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90305-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  47 in total

Review 1.  Changes in posture control across the life span--a systems approach.

Authors:  M H Woollacott; A Shumway-Cook
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1990-12

2.  Mechanical effort predicts the selection of ankle over hip strategies in nonstepping postural responses.

Authors:  Maarten Afschrift; Ilse Jonkers; Joris De Schutter; Friedl De Groote
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A stricter condition for standing balance after unexpected perturbations.

Authors:  At L Hof; Carolin Curtze
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Predicting the dynamic postural control response from quiet-stance behavior in elderly adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Hsiao-Wecksler; Kunal Katdare; Jennifer Matson; Wen Liu; Lewis A Lipsitz; James J Collins
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Neurophysiological analysis of the clinical pull test.

Authors:  Joy Lynn Tan; Thushara Perera; Jennifer L McGinley; Shivanthan Arthur Curtis Yohanandan; Peter Brown; Wesley Thevathasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Predictive and Reactive Locomotor Adaptability in Healthy Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sebastian Bohm; Lida Mademli; Falk Mersmann; Adamantios Arampatzis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Perturbation-based balance training for falls reduction among older adults: Current evidence and implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Marissa H G Gerards; Christopher McCrum; Avril Mansfield; Kenneth Meijer
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.730

Review 8.  Devices and tasks involved in the objective assessment of standing dynamic balancing - A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Bálint Petró; Alexandra Papachatzopoulou; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reactive Balance Control in Response to Perturbation in Unilateral Stance: Interaction Effects of Direction, Displacement and Velocity on Compensatory Neuromuscular and Kinematic Responses.

Authors:  Kathrin Freyler; Albert Gollhofer; Ralf Colin; Uli Brüderlin; Ramona Ritzmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Force accuracy rather than high stiffness is associated with faster learning and reduced falls in human balance.

Authors:  Amel Cherif; Ian Loram; Jacopo Zenzeri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Virtual stick balancing: skill development in Newtonian and Aristotelian dynamics.

Authors:  Balazs A Kovacs; Tamas Insperger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Control of structural redundancy from the head to trunk in the human upright standing revealed using a data-driven approach.

Authors:  Kazuya Tanaka; Soichiro Fujiki; Tomoaki Atomi; Yoriko Atomi; Wataru Takano; Katsuya Hasegawa; Akinori Nagano; Miho Shimizu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Exploring the effects of serial and parallel elasticity on a hopping robot.

Authors:  Guoping Zhao; Omid Mohseni; Marc Murcia; Andre Seyfarth; Maziar A Sharbafi
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.493

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.