Literature DB >> 27489362

Mechanical effort predicts the selection of ankle over hip strategies in nonstepping postural responses.

Maarten Afschrift1, Ilse Jonkers2, Joris De Schutter3, Friedl De Groote2.   

Abstract

Experimental studies have shown that a continuum of ankle and hip strategies is used to restore posture following an external perturbation. Postural responses can be modeled by feedback control with feedback gains that optimize a specific objective. On the one hand, feedback gains that minimize effort have been used to predict muscle activity during perturbed standing. On the other hand, hip and ankle strategies have been predicted by minimizing postural instability and deviation from upright posture. It remains unclear, however, whether and how effort minimization influences the selection of a specific postural response. We hypothesize that the relative importance of minimizing mechanical work vs. postural instability influences the strategy used to restore upright posture. This hypothesis was investigated based on experiments and predictive simulations of the postural response following a backward support surface translation. Peak hip flexion angle was significantly correlated with three experimentally determined measures of effort, i.e., mechanical work, mean muscle activity and metabolic energy. Furthermore, a continuum of ankle and hip strategies was predicted in simulation when changing the relative importance of minimizing mechanical work and postural instability, with increased weighting of mechanical work resulting in an ankle strategy. In conclusion, the combination of experimental measurements and predictive simulations of the postural response to a backward support surface translation showed that the trade-off between effort and postural instability minimization can explain the selection of a specific postural response in the continuum of potential ankle and hip strategies.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  motor control; postural responses; simulation; standing balance control

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27489362      PMCID: PMC5144705          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00127.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  30 in total

1.  Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques.

Authors:  C F Runge; C L Shupert; F B Horak; F E Zajac
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Postural control is scaled to level of postural threat.

Authors:  A L Adkin; J S Frank; M G Carpenter; G W Peysar
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  The passive, human calf muscles in relation to standing: the short range stiffness lies in the contractile component.

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Constantinos N Maganaris; Martin Lakie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Neuromechanical tuning of nonlinear postural control dynamics.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Keith W van Antwerp; Jevin E Scrivens; J Lucas McKay; Torrence D J Welch; Jeffrey T Bingham; Stephen P DeWeerth
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.642

Review 5.  Aging of the somatosensory system: a translational perspective.

Authors:  Scott W Shaffer; Anne L Harrison
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-01-23

6.  Functional base of support decreases with age.

Authors:  M B King; J O Judge; L Wolfson
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-11

7.  Human standing posture: multi-joint movement strategies based on biomechanical constraints.

Authors:  A D Kuo; F E Zajac
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Postural feedback scaling deficits in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Seyoung Kim; Fay B Horak; Patricia Carlson-Kuhta; Sukyung Park
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Optimization of muscle activity for task-level goals predicts complex changes in limb forces across biomechanical contexts.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Lena H Ting
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Mechanisms of motor adaptation in reactive balance control.

Authors:  Torrence D J Welch; Lena H Ting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  The effects of slow breathing on postural muscles during standing perturbations in young adults.

Authors:  P Siedlecki; T D Ivanova; J K Shoemaker; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Interactions between initial posture and task-level goal explain experimental variability in postural responses to perturbations of standing balance.

Authors:  Tom Van Wouwe; Lena H Ting; Friedl De Groote
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness.

Authors:  Ambrus Zelei; John Milton; Gabor Stepan; Tamas Insperger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effects of a powered ankle-foot orthosis on perturbed standing balance.

Authors:  Amber R Emmens; Edwin H F van Asseldonk; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Controller synthesis and clinical exploration of wearable gyroscopic actuators to support human balance.

Authors:  Daniel Lemus; Andrew Berry; Saher Jabeen; Chandrasekaran Jayaraman; Kristen Hohl; Frans C T van der Helm; Arun Jayaraman; Heike Vallery
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Gymnastics Experience Enhances the Development of Bipedal-Stance Multi-Segmental Coordination and Control During Proprioceptive Reweighting.

Authors:  Albert Busquets; Blai Ferrer-Uris; Rosa Angulo-Barroso; Peter Federolf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-15

7.  Development and Evaluation of BenchBalance: A System for Benchmarking Balance Capabilities of Wearable Robots and Their Users.

Authors:  Cristina Bayón; Gabriel Delgado-Oleas; Leticia Avellar; Francesca Bentivoglio; Francesco Di Tommaso; Nevio L Tagliamonte; Eduardo Rocon; Edwin H F van Asseldonk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Postural Control When Using an Industrial Lower Limb Exoskeleton: Impact of Reaching for a Working Tool and External Perturbation.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinhilber; Robert Seibt; Monika A Rieger; Tessy Luger
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Similar sensorimotor transformations control balance during standing and walking.

Authors:  Maarten Afschrift; Friedl De Groote; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.