Literature DB >> 35232278

Virtual stick balancing: skill development in Newtonian and Aristotelian dynamics.

Balazs A Kovacs1, Tamas Insperger1.   

Abstract

Human reaction delay significantly limits manual control of unstable systems. It is more difficult to balance a short stick on a fingertip than a long one, because a shorter stick falls faster and therefore requires faster reactions. In this study, a virtual stick balancing environment was developed where the reaction delay can be artificially modulated and the law of motion can be changed between second-order (Newtonian) and first-order (Aristotelian) dynamics. Twenty-four subjects were separated into two groups and asked to perform virtual stick balancing programmed according to either Newtonian or Aristotelian dynamics. The shortest stick length (critical length, Lc) was determined for different added delays in six sessions of balancing trials performed on different days. The observed relation between Lc and the overall reaction delay τ reflected the feature of the underlying mathematical models: (i) for the Newtonian dynamics Lc is proportional to τ2; (ii) for the Aristotelian dynamics Lc is proportional to τ. Deviation of the measured Lc(τ) function from the theoretical one was larger for the Newtonian dynamics for all sessions, which suggests that, at least in virtually controlled tasks, it is more difficult to adopt second-order dynamics than first-order dynamics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delayed feedback; dynamics order; human balancing; motor learning; reaction delay; stabilizability

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35232278      PMCID: PMC8889188          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  30 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Does the brain model Newton's laws?

Authors:  J McIntyre; M Zago; A Berthoz; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Perception of acceleration with short presentation times: can acceleration be used in interception?

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-10

Review 4.  The visual perception of motion.

Authors:  Robert J Snowden; Tom C A Freeman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Balancing on tightropes and slacklines.

Authors:  P Paoletti; L Mahadevan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Internal model of gravity for hand interception: parametric adaptation to zero-gravity visual targets on Earth.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused.

Authors:  John Milton; Ana Solodkin; Petr Hlustík; Steven L Small
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Temporal Evolution of Spatial Computations for Visuomotor Control.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Alexandra Reichenbach; Sae Franklin; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Complex dynamics and bifurcations in neurology.

Authors:  J G Milton; A Longtin; A Beuter; M C Mackey; L Glass
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1989-05-22       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Virtual stick balancing: sensorimotor uncertainties related to angular displacement and velocity.

Authors:  Balazs A Kovacs; John Milton; Tamas Insperger
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.