| Literature DB >> 34055595 |
Xinghao Wang1,2, Ke Wu1,2, Xiaoran Li1,2, Junjie Jin1,2, Yang Yu1,2, Hongzan Sun1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aim to compare the radiomic features and parameters on 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) between patients with endometrial cancer with Lynch syndrome and those with endometrial cancer without Lynch syndrome. We also hope to explore the biologic significance of selected radiomic features.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-FDG PET/CT; Lynch syndrome; PD1 expression; endometrial cancer; radiomics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34055595 PMCID: PMC8152935 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.595430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Clinical characteristics of patients.
| Clinical features | Value |
|---|---|
| cohort 1 | |
| No. of patients | 100 |
| Mean age (95% CI) | 56.56(55.06 - 58.06) years |
| FIGO stage: | |
| I | 68(68%) |
| II | 23 (23%) |
| III | 9 (9%) |
| Differentiation grade: | |
| Well differentiated | 29(29%) |
| Moderately differentiated | 45(45%) |
| Poorly differentiated | 26(26%) |
| Histotype: | |
| Endometrioid | 82(82%) |
| Mixed | 6(6%) |
| Others | 12(12%) |
| Cervical stromal invasion depth: | |
| < 1/2 | 61(61%) |
| ≥1/2 | 39(39%) |
| cohort 2 | |
| No. of patients | 23 |
| Type: | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck | 5(22%) |
| Carcinoma of the lungs (Adenocarcinoma) | 4 (17%) |
| Carcinoma of the lungs (Squamous cell carcinoma) | 9 (39%) |
| Endometrial carcinoma | 5(22%) |
FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
The difference of PET/CT parameters and radiomics in cohort 1.
| With Lynch | Without Lynch | P | test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 50 | 50 | ||
| SUVmax (g/cm3) | 17.92(14.25,21.99) | 16.26(13.46,19.88) | 0.099 | U-test |
| SUVmean (g/cm3) | 9.80 (7.78,11.59) | 8.99 (5.97,10.95) | 0.182 | U-test |
| SUVpeak(g/cm3) | 14.42(11.63,18.3) | 12.49(9.16,15.88) | 0.026 | U-test |
| MTV (cm3) | 17.88 (7.24,32.77) | 11.91 (4.59,15.63) | <0.005 | U-test |
| TLG (g) | 143.55(67.48,359.85) | 99.96(32.01,163.16) | <0.005 | U-test |
| GLCMEntropy_angle0 | 10.84(10.09,11.65) | 9.29(9.07,9.54) | <0.001 | U-test |
| GLCMEntropy_angle45 | 10.86(9.97,11.56) | 9.13(8.78,9.32) | <0.001 | U-test |
| GLCMEntropy_angle90 | 10.84(10.09,11.59) | 9.24(8.99,9.52) | <0.001 | U-test |
| GLCMEntropy_angle135 | 10.71(9.98,11.54) | 9.2 (8.77,9.46) | <0.001 | U-test |
| GLCMEntropy* | 10.74(10.01,11.59) | 9.2 (8.91,9.45) | <0.001 | U-test |
Normal distribution data: means ± standard deviations; t-test.
Non-normal distribution data: medians and interquartile ranges; U-test.
*GLCMEntropy= (GLCMEntropy_angle0 + GLCMEntropy_angle45 + GLCMEntropy_angle90 +GLCMEntropy_angle135)/4.
Figure 1Determination of ROC curve of endometrial cancer with and without Lynch syndrome by PET/CT parameters.
Figure 2The ROC curve of training group.
Figure 3The ROC curve of test group.
Figure 4Decision curve analysis between MTV, TLG and GLCMEntropy.
Figure 5Calibration curve in training group and test group.
Figure 6Box diagrams between radiomics and PDCD1 expression. * representing outliers.
Figure 7Determination of ROC curve of PDCD1 expression by radiomics.