Literature DB >> 30120041

A radiomics approach to assess tumour-infiltrating CD8 cells and response to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy: an imaging biomarker, retrospective multicohort study.

Roger Sun1, Elaine Johanna Limkin1, Maria Vakalopoulou2, Laurent Dercle3, Stéphane Champiat4, Shan Rong Han5, Loïc Verlingue4, David Brandao6, Andrea Lancia7, Samy Ammari8, Antoine Hollebecque4, Jean-Yves Scoazec9, Aurélien Marabelle4, Christophe Massard4, Jean-Charles Soria10, Charlotte Robert11, Nikos Paragios2, Eric Deutsch12, Charles Ferté13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because responses of patients with cancer to immunotherapy can vary in success, innovative predictors of response to treatment are urgently needed to improve treatment outcomes. We aimed to develop and independently validate a radiomics-based biomarker of tumour-infiltrating CD8 cells in patients included in phase 1 trials of anti-programmed cell death protein (PD)-1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy. We also aimed to evaluate the association between the biomarker, and tumour immune phenotype and clinical outcomes of these patients.
METHODS: In this retrospective multicohort study, we used four independent cohorts of patients with advanced solid tumours to develop and validate a radiomic signature predictive of immunotherapy response by combining contrast-enhanced CT images and RNA-seq genomic data from tumour biopsies to assess CD8 cell tumour infiltration. To develop the radiomic signature of CD8 cells, we used the CT images and RNA sequencing data of 135 patients with advanced solid malignant tumours who had been enrolled into the MOSCATO trial between May 1, 2012, and March 31, 2016, in France (training set). The genomic data, which are based on the CD8B gene, were used to estimate the abundance of CD8 cells in the samples and data were then aligned with the images to generate the radiomic signatures. The concordance of the radiomic signature (primary endpoint) was validated in a Cancer Genome Atlas [TGCA] database dataset including 119 patients who had available baseline preoperative imaging data and corresponding transcriptomic data on June 30, 2017. From 84 input variables used for the machine-learning method (78 radiomic features, five location variables, and one technical variable), a radiomics-based predictor of the CD8 cell expression signature was built by use of machine learning (elastic-net regularised regression method). Two other independent cohorts of patients with advanced solid tumours were used to evaluate this predictor. The immune phenotype internal cohort (n=100), were randomly selected from the Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus database of patient medical records based on previously described, extreme tumour-immune phenotypes: immune-inflamed (with dense CD8 cell infiltration) or immune-desert (with low CD8 cell infiltration), irrespective of treatment delivered; these data were used to analyse the correlation of the immune phenotype with this biomarker. Finally, the immunotherapy-treated dataset (n=137) of patients recruited from Dec 1, 2011, to Jan 31, 2014, at the Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, who had been treated with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monotherapy in phase 1 trials, was used to assess the predictive value of this biomarker in terms of clinical outcome.
FINDINGS: We developed a radiomic signature for CD8 cells that included eight variables, which was validated with the gene expression signature of CD8 cells in the TCGA dataset (area under the curve [AUC]=0·67; 95% CI 0·57-0·77; p=0·0019). In the cohort with assumed immune phenotypes, the signature was also able to discriminate inflamed tumours from immune-desert tumours (0·76; 0·66-0·86; p<0·0001). In patients treated with anti-PD-1 and PD-L1, a high baseline radiomic score (relative to the median) was associated with a higher proportion of patients who achieved an objective response at 3 months (vs those with progressive disease or stable disease; p=0·049) and a higher proportion of patients who had an objective response (vs those with progressive disease or stable disease; p=0·025) or stable disease (vs those with progressive disease; p=0·013) at 6 months. A high baseline radiomic score was also associated with improved overall survival in univariate (median overall survival 24·3 months in the high radiomic score group, 95% CI 18·63-42·1; vs 11·5 months in the low radiomic score group, 7·98-15·6; hazard ratio 0·58, 95% CI 0·39-0·87; p=0·0081) and multivariate analyses (0·52, 0·35-0·79; p=0·0022).
INTERPRETATION: The radiomic signature of CD8 cells was validated in three independent cohorts. This imaging predictor provided a promising way to predict the immune phenotype of tumours and to infer clinical outcomes for patients with cancer who had been treated with anti-PD-1 and PD-L1. Our imaging biomarker could be useful in estimating CD8 cell count and predicting clinical outcomes of patients treated with immunotherapy, when validated by further prospective randomised trials. FUNDING: Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, and SIRIC-SOCRATE 2.0, French Society of Radiation Oncology.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30120041     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30413-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  260 in total

1.  Extracting and Selecting Robust Radiomic Features from PET/MR Images in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Pengfei Yang; Lei Xu; Zuozhen Cao; Yidong Wan; Yi Xue; Yangkang Jiang; Eric Yen; Chen Luo; Jing Wang; Yi Rong; Tianye Niu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis.

Authors:  Alex Zwanenburg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Donghyun Kim; Ho Sung Kim; Seo Young Park; Jung Youn Kim; Se Jin Cho; Jae Ho Shin; Jeong Hoon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Why imaging data alone is not enough: AI-based integration of imaging, omics, and clinical data.

Authors:  Andreas Holzinger; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Igor Jurisica
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; Janis M Taube; Drew M Pardoll
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  How to read and review papers on machine learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: a survival guide to key methodological concepts.

Authors:  Burak Kocak; Ece Ates Kus; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Texture Analysis on [18F]FDG PET/CT in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Correlations Between PET Features, CT Features, and Histological Types.

Authors:  Francesco Bianconi; Isabella Palumbo; Mario Luca Fravolini; Rita Chiari; Matteo Minestrini; Luca Brunese; Barbara Palumbo
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Patterns of progression in patients treated for immuno-oncology antibodies combination.

Authors:  Alice Bernard-Tessier; Capucine Baldini; Eduardo Castanon; Patricia Martin; Stéphane Champiat; Antoine Hollebecque; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Andreea Varga; Rastilav Bahleda; Anas Gazzah; Jean-Marie Michot; Vincent Ribrag; Jean-Pierre Armand; Aurélien Marabelle; Jean-Charles Soria; Christophe Massard; Samy Ammari
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.968

9.  Prognostic and theranostic 18F-FDG PET biomarkers for anti-PD1 immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: association with outcome and transcriptomics.

Authors:  Romain-David Seban; John S Nemer; Aurélien Marabelle; Randy Yeh; Eric Deutsch; Samy Ammari; Antoine Moya-Plana; Fatima-Zohra Mokrane; Robyn D Gartrell; Grace Finkel; Luke Barker; Amélie E Bigorgne; Lawrence H Schwartz; Yvonne Saenger; Caroline Robert; Laurent Dercle
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Radiomics Response Signature for Identification of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Sensitive to Therapies Targeting EGFR Pathway.

Authors:  Laurent Dercle; Lin Lu; Lawrence H Schwartz; Min Qian; Sabine Tejpar; Peter Eggleton; Binsheng Zhao; Hubert Piessevaux
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.