Sarah Grundy1, Patricia Lee2, Kirsten Small3,4, Faruk Ahmed2. 1. School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. sarah.grundy@griffithuni.edu.au. 2. School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. 3. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, QLD, Gold Coast, Australia. 4. Transforming Maternity Care Collaborative, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Being born small for gestational age is a strong predictor of the short- and long-term health of the neonate, child, and adult. Variation in the rates of small for gestational age have been identified across population groups in high income countries, including Australia. Understanding the factors contributing to this variation may assist clinicians to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with being born small. Victoria, in addition to New South Wales, accounts for the largest proportion of net overseas migration and births in Australia. The aim of this research was to analyse how migration was associated with small for gestational age in Victoria. METHODS: This was a cross sectional population health study of singleton births in Victoria from 2009 to 2018 (n = 708,475). The prevalence of being born small for gestational age (SGA; <10th centile) was determined for maternal region of origin groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the association between maternal region of origin and SGA. RESULTS: Maternal region of origin was an independent risk factor for SGA in Victoria (p < .001), with a prevalence of SGA for migrant women of 11.3% (n = 27,815) and 7.3% for Australian born women (n = 33,749). Women from the Americas (aOR1.24, 95%CI:1.14 to 1.36), North Africa, North East Africa, and the Middle East (aOR1.57, 95%CI:1.52 to 1.63); Southern Central Asia (aOR2.58, 95%CI:2.50 to 2.66); South East Asia (aOR2.02, 95%CI: 1.95 to 2.01); and sub-Saharan Africa (aOR1.80, 95%CI:1.69 to 1.92) were more likely to birth an SGA child in comparison to women born in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: Victorian woman's region of origin was an independent risk factor for SGA. Variation in the rates of SGA between maternal regions of origin suggests additional factors such as a woman's pre-migration exposures, the context of the migration journey, settlement conditions and social environment post migration might impact the potential for SGA. These findings highlight the importance of intergenerational improvements to the wellbeing of migrant women and their children. Further research to identify modifiable elements that contribute to birthweight differences across population groups would help enable appropriate healthcare responses aimed at reducing the rate of being SGA.
BACKGROUND: Being born small for gestational age is a strong predictor of the short- and long-term health of the neonate, child, and adult. Variation in the rates of small for gestational age have been identified across population groups in high income countries, including Australia. Understanding the factors contributing to this variation may assist clinicians to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with being born small. Victoria, in addition to New South Wales, accounts for the largest proportion of net overseas migration and births in Australia. The aim of this research was to analyse how migration was associated with small for gestational age in Victoria. METHODS: This was a cross sectional population health study of singleton births in Victoria from 2009 to 2018 (n = 708,475). The prevalence of being born small for gestational age (SGA; <10th centile) was determined for maternal region of origin groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the association between maternal region of origin and SGA. RESULTS: Maternal region of origin was an independent risk factor for SGA in Victoria (p < .001), with a prevalence of SGA for migrant women of 11.3% (n = 27,815) and 7.3% for Australian born women (n = 33,749). Women from the Americas (aOR1.24, 95%CI:1.14 to 1.36), North Africa, North East Africa, and the Middle East (aOR1.57, 95%CI:1.52 to 1.63); Southern Central Asia (aOR2.58, 95%CI:2.50 to 2.66); South East Asia (aOR2.02, 95%CI: 1.95 to 2.01); and sub-Saharan Africa (aOR1.80, 95%CI:1.69 to 1.92) were more likely to birth an SGA child in comparison to women born in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: Victorian woman's region of origin was an independent risk factor for SGA. Variation in the rates of SGA between maternal regions of origin suggests additional factors such as a woman's pre-migration exposures, the context of the migration journey, settlement conditions and social environment post migration might impact the potential for SGA. These findings highlight the importance of intergenerational improvements to the wellbeing of migrant women and their children. Further research to identify modifiable elements that contribute to birthweight differences across population groups would help enable appropriate healthcare responses aimed at reducing the rate of being SGA.
Entities:
Keywords:
Birthweight; Maternity; Migration; Perinatal health; Pregnancy; Region of origin; Small for gestational age
Authors: Aris T Papageorghiou; Stephen H Kennedy; Laurent J Salomon; Douglas G Altman; Eric O Ohuma; William Stones; Michael G Gravett; Fernando C Barros; Cesar Victora; Manorama Purwar; Yasmin Jaffer; Julia A Noble; Enrico Bertino; Ruyan Pang; Leila Cheikh Ismail; Ann Lambert; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; José Villar Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Naho Morisaki; Kevin Yuji Urayama; Keisuke Yoshii; S V Subramanian; Susumu Yokoya Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2017-08-19 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Kari R Risnes; Lars J Vatten; Jennifer L Baker; Karen Jameson; Ulla Sovio; Eero Kajantie; Merete Osler; Ruth Morley; Markus Jokela; Rebecca C Painter; Valter Sundh; Geir W Jacobsen; Johan G Eriksson; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Michael B Bracken Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: José Villar; Aris T Papageorghiou; Ruyan Pang; Eric O Ohuma; Leila Cheikh Ismail; Fernando C Barros; Ann Lambert; Maria Carvalho; Yasmin A Jaffer; Enrico Bertino; Michael G Gravett; Doug G Altman; Manorama Purwar; Ihunnaya O Frederick; Julia A Noble; Cesar G Victora; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Stephen H Kennedy Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2014-07-06 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Ngaire H Anderson; Lynn C Sadler; Alistair W Stewart; Elaine M Fyfe; Lesley M E McCowan Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 2.100
Authors: Naoko Kozuki; Anne C C Lee; Mariangela F Silveira; Ayesha Sania; Joshua P Vogel; Linda Adair; Fernando Barros; Laura E Caulfield; Parul Christian; Wafaie Fawzi; Jean Humphrey; Lieven Huybregts; Aroonsri Mongkolchati; Robert Ntozini; David Osrin; Dominique Roberfroid; James Tielsch; Anjana Vaidya; Robert E Black; Joanne Katz Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Vicki Flenady; Aleena M Wojcieszek; Philippa Middleton; David Ellwood; Jan Jaap Erwich; Michael Coory; T Yee Khong; Robert M Silver; Gordon C S Smith; Frances M Boyle; Joy E Lawn; Hannah Blencowe; Susannah Hopkins Leisher; Mechthild M Gross; Dell Horey; Lynn Farrales; Frank Bloomfield; Lesley McCowan; Stephanie J Brown; K S Joseph; Jennifer Zeitlin; Hanna E Reinebrant; Joanne Cacciatore; Claudia Ravaldi; Alfredo Vannacci; Jillian Cassidy; Paul Cassidy; Cindy Farquhar; Euan Wallace; Dimitrios Siassakos; Alexander E P Heazell; Claire Storey; Lynn Sadler; Scott Petersen; J Frederik Frøen; Robert L Goldenberg Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 79.321