Literature DB >> 23130970

Independent risk factors for infants who are small for gestational age by customised birthweight centiles in a multi-ethnic New Zealand population.

Ngaire H Anderson1, Lynn C Sadler, Alistair W Stewart, Elaine M Fyfe, Lesley M E McCowan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infants born small for gestational age (SGA) by customised birthweight centiles are at increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with those SGA by population centiles. Risk factors for customised SGA have not previously been described in a general obstetric population. AIM: To determine independent risk factors for customised SGA in a multi-ethnic New Zealand population.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively recorded maternity data from 2006 to 2009 at National Women's Health, Auckland, New Zealand. After exclusion of infants with congenital anomalies and missing data, our final study population was 26,254 singleton pregnancies. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for ethnicity, body mass index, maternal age, parity, smoking status, social deprivation, hypertensive disease, antepartum haemorrhage (APH), diabetes and relevant pre-existing medical conditions.
RESULTS: Independent risk factors for SGA included obesity (adjusted odds ratio 1.24 [95% CI 1.11-1.39] relative to normal weight), maternal age ≥ 35 years (1.16 [1.05-1.30] relative to 20-29 years), nulliparity (1.13 [1.04-1.24] relative to parity 1), cigarette smoking (2.01 [1.79-2.27]), gestational hypertension (1.46 [1.21-1.75]), pre-eclampsia (2.94 [2.49-3.48]), chronic hypertension (1.68 [1.34-2.09]), placental abruption (2.57 [1.74-3.78]) and APH of unknown origin (1.71 [1.45-2.00]). Gestational diabetes (0.80 [0.67-0.96]) and type 1 diabetes (0.26 [0.11-0.64]) were associated with reduced risk.
CONCLUSIONS: We report independent pregnancy risk factors for customised SGA in a general obstetric population. In contrast to population SGA, obesity is associated with increased risk. Our findings may help identify pregnancies that require increased fetal growth surveillance.
© 2012 The Authors ANZJOG © 2012 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23130970     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  12 in total

Review 1.  Maternal, Labor, Delivery, and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Placental Abruption: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katheryne L Downes; Katherine L Grantz; Edmond D Shenassa
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  The impact of HPV vaccination beyond cancer prevention: effect on pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Susan Yuill; Louiza S Velentzis; Megan Smith; Sam Egger; C David Wrede; Deborah Bateson; Marc Arbyn; Karen Canfell
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 4.526

3.  Embryonic defects induced by maternal obesity in mice derive from Stella insufficiency in oocytes.

Authors:  Longsen Han; Chao Ren; Ling Li; Xiaoyan Li; Juan Ge; Haichao Wang; Yi-Liang Miao; Xuejiang Guo; Kelle H Moley; Wenjie Shu; Qiang Wang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Maternal region of origin and Small for gestational age: a cross-sectional analysis of Victorian perinatal data.

Authors:  Sarah Grundy; Patricia Lee; Kirsten Small; Faruk Ahmed
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  A review of the impact of dietary intakes in human pregnancy on infant birthweight.

Authors:  Jessica A Grieger; Vicki L Clifton
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Risk factors and adverse perinatal outcomes among term and preterm infants born small-for-gestational-age: secondary analyses of the WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.

Authors:  Erika Ota; Togoobaatar Ganchimeg; Naho Morisaki; Joshua P Vogel; Cynthia Pileggi; Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo; João P Souza; Rintaro Mori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Social correlates of term small for gestational age babies in a Russian Arctic setting.

Authors:  Anna A Usynina; Andrej M Grjibovski; Jon Øyvind Odland; Alexandra Krettek
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.228

8.  The use of the mHealth program Smarter Pregnancy in preconception care: rationale, study design and data collection of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthijs R van Dijk; Elsje C Oostingh; Maria P H Koster; Sten P Willemsen; Joop S E Laven; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Contribution of socioeconomic status to the risk of small for gestational age infants--a population-based study of 1,390,165 singleton live births in Finland.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Mika Gissler; Ulla Sankilampi; Juho Saari; Michael R Kramer; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2013-05-01

10.  Clinical prediction in early pregnancy of infants small for gestational age by customised birthweight centiles: findings from a healthy nulliparous cohort.

Authors:  Lesley M E McCowan; John M D Thompson; Rennae S Taylor; Robyn A North; Lucilla Poston; Philip N Baker; Jenny Myers; Claire T Roberts; Gustaaf A Dekker; Nigel A B Simpson; James J Walker; Louise C Kenny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.