| Literature DB >> 26794070 |
Vicki Flenady1, Aleena M Wojcieszek2, Philippa Middleton3, David Ellwood4, Jan Jaap Erwich5, Michael Coory6, T Yee Khong7, Robert M Silver8, Gordon C S Smith9, Frances M Boyle10, Joy E Lawn11, Hannah Blencowe11, Susannah Hopkins Leisher2, Mechthild M Gross12, Dell Horey13, Lynn Farrales14, Frank Bloomfield15, Lesley McCowan16, Stephanie J Brown17, K S Joseph18, Jennifer Zeitlin19, Hanna E Reinebrant2, Joanne Cacciatore20, Claudia Ravaldi21, Alfredo Vannacci22, Jillian Cassidy23, Paul Cassidy23, Cindy Farquhar24, Euan Wallace25, Dimitrios Siassakos26, Alexander E P Heazell27, Claire Storey28, Lynn Sadler24, Scott Petersen29, J Frederik Frøen30, Robert L Goldenberg31.
Abstract
Variation in stillbirth rates across high-income countries and large equity gaps within high-income countries persist. If all high-income countries achieved stillbirth rates equal to the best performing countries, 19,439 late gestation (28 weeks or more) stillbirths could have been avoided in 2015. The proportion of unexplained stillbirths is high and can be addressed through improvements in data collection, investigation, and classification, and with a better understanding of causal pathways. Substandard care contributes to 20-30% of all stillbirths and the contribution is even higher for late gestation intrapartum stillbirths. National perinatal mortality audit programmes need to be implemented in all high-income countries. The need to reduce stigma and fatalism related to stillbirth and to improve bereavement care are also clear, persisting priorities for action. In high-income countries, a woman living under adverse socioeconomic circumstances has twice the risk of having a stillborn child when compared to her more advantaged counterparts. Programmes at community and country level need to improve health in disadvantaged families to address these inequities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26794070 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet ISSN: 0140-6736 Impact factor: 79.321