Literature DB >> 34050968

A classification approach to estimating human circadian phase under circadian alignment from actigraphy and photometry data.

Lindsey S Brown1, Melissa A St Hilaire2,3, Andrew W McHill2,3,4, Andrew J K Phillips5, Laura K Barger2,3, Akane Sano6, Charles A Czeisler2,3, Francis J Doyle1,2, Elizabeth B Klerman2,3,7.   

Abstract

The time of dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) is the gold standard for circadian phase assessment in humans, but collection of samples for DLMO is time and resource-intensive. Numerous studies have attempted to estimate circadian phase from actigraphy data, but most of these studies have involved individuals on controlled and stable sleep-wake schedules, with mean errors reported between 0.5 and 1 hour. We found that such algorithms are less successful in estimating DLMO in a population of college students with more irregular schedules: Mean errors in estimating the time of DLMO are approximately 1.5-1.6 hours. We reframed the problem as a classification problem and estimated whether an individual's current phase was before or after DLMO. Using a neural network, we found high classification accuracy of about 90%, which decreased the mean error in DLMO estimation-identifying the time at which the switch in classification occurs-to approximately 1.3 hours. To test whether this classification approach was valid when activity and circadian rhythms are decoupled, we applied the same neural network to data from inpatient forced desynchrony studies in which participants are scheduled to sleep and wake at all circadian phases (rather than their habitual schedules). In participants on forced desynchrony protocols, overall classification accuracy dropped to 55%-65% with a range of 20%-80% for a given day; this accuracy was highly dependent upon the phase angle (ie, time) between DLMO and sleep onset, with the highest accuracy at phase angles associated with nighttime sleep. Circadian patterns in activity, therefore, should be included when developing and testing actigraphy-based approaches to circadian phase estimation. Our novel algorithm may be a promising approach for estimating the onset of melatonin in some conditions and could be generalized to other hormones.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actigraphy; biological clocks; circadian rhythm; classification; machine learning; melatonin; shift-work

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34050968      PMCID: PMC8474125          DOI: 10.1111/jpi.12745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pineal Res        ISSN: 0742-3098            Impact factor:   12.081


  43 in total

1.  Uncovering residual effects of chronic sleep loss on human performance.

Authors:  Daniel A Cohen; Wei Wang; James K Wyatt; Richard E Kronauer; Derk-Jan Dijk; Charles A Czeisler; Elizabeth B Klerman
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Long short-term memory.

Authors:  S Hochreiter; J Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 3.  Systems Chronotherapeutics.

Authors:  Annabelle Ballesta; Pasquale F Innominato; Robert Dallmann; David A Rand; Francis A Lévi
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 25.468

4.  Increased sensitivity of the circadian system to light in delayed sleep-wake phase disorder.

Authors:  Lauren A Watson; Andrew J K Phillips; Ihaia T Hosken; Elise M McGlashan; Clare Anderson; Leon C Lack; Steven W Lockley; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Sean W Cain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Addition of a non-photic component to a light-based mathematical model of the human circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  Melissa A St Hilaire; Elizabeth B Klerman; Sat Bir S Khalsa; Kenneth P Wright; Charles A Czeisler; Richard E Kronauer
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Phase relationships between sleep-wake cycle and underlying circadian rhythms in Morningness-Eveningness.

Authors:  Valérie Mongrain; Suzie Lavoie; Brahim Selmaoui; Jean Paquet; Marie Dumont
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.182

7.  Phase-amplitude resetting of the human circadian pacemaker via bright light: a further analysis.

Authors:  M E Jewett; R E Kronauer; C A Czeisler
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.182

8.  Analysis method and experimental conditions affect computed circadian phase from melatonin data.

Authors:  Hadassa Klerman; Melissa A St Hilaire; Richard E Kronauer; Joshua J Gooley; Claude Gronfier; Joseph T Hull; Steven W Lockley; Nayantara Santhi; Wei Wang; Elizabeth B Klerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Application of a Limit-Cycle Oscillator Model for Prediction of Circadian Phase in Rotating Night Shift Workers.

Authors:  Julia E Stone; Xavier L Aubert; Henning Maass; Andrew J K Phillips; Michelle Magee; Mark E Howard; Steven W Lockley; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Tracey L Sletten
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Universal method for robust detection of circadian state from gene expression.

Authors:  Rosemary Braun; William L Kath; Marta Iwanaszko; Elzbieta Kula-Eversole; Sabra M Abbott; Kathryn J Reid; Phyllis C Zee; Ravi Allada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.