Literature DB >> 15155011

Phase relationships between sleep-wake cycle and underlying circadian rhythms in Morningness-Eveningness.

Valérie Mongrain1, Suzie Lavoie, Brahim Selmaoui, Jean Paquet, Marie Dumont.   

Abstract

A shorter phase angle between habitual wake time and underlying circadian rhythms has been reported in evening types (E types) compared to morning-types (M types). In this study, phase angles were compared between 12 E types and 12 M types to verify if this difference was observed when the sleep schedule was relatively free from external social constraints. Subjects were selected according to their Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire score (MEQ score). There were 6 men and 6 women in each group (ages 19-34 years), and all had a habitual sleep duration between 7 and 9 h. Sleep schedule was recorded by actigraphy and averaged over 7 days. Circadian phase was estimated by the hour of temperature minimum (T(min)) in a 26-h recording and by the timing of the onset of melatonin secretion (dim-light melatonin onset [DLMO]) measured in saliva samples. Phase angles were defined as the interval between phase markers and averaged wake time. Results showed that, in the present experimental conditions, phase angles were very similar in the 2 groups of subjects. However, results confirmed the previously reported correlation between phase and phase angle, showing that a later circadian phase was associated with a shorter phase angle. Gender comparisons showed that for a same MEQ score, women had an earlier DLMO and a longer phase angle between DLMO and wake time. Despite a significant difference in the averaged circadian phases between E-type and M-type groups, there was an overlap in the circadian phases of the subjects of the 2 groups. Further comparisons were made between the 2 circadian types, separately for the subgroups with overlapping or nonoverlapping circadian phases. In both subgroups, the significant difference between MEQ scores, bedtimes, and wake times were maintained in the expected direction. In the subgroup with nonoverlapping circadian phases, phase angles were shorter in E-type subjects, in accordance with previous studies. However, in the overlapping subgroup, phase angles were significantly longer in E types compared to M types. Results suggest that the morningness-eveningness preference identified by the MEQ score refers to 2 distinct mechanisms, 1 associated with a difference in circadian period and phase of entrainment and the other associated with chronobiological aspects of sleep regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15155011     DOI: 10.1177/0748730404264365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  69 in total

1.  Early chronotype with advanced activity rhythms and dim light melatonin onset in a rural population.

Authors:  Francieli S Ruiz; Felipe Beijamini; Andrew D Beale; Bruno da Silva B Gonçalves; Daniel Vartanian; Tâmara P Taporoski; Benita Middleton; José E Krieger; Homero Vallada; Josephine Arendt; Alexandre C Pereira; Kristen L Knutson; Mario Pedrazzoli; Malcolm von Schantz
Journal:  J Pineal Res       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 13.007

2.  Night shift performance is improved by a compromise circadian phase position: study 3. Circadian phase after 7 night shifts with an intervening weekend off.

Authors:  Mark R Smith; Charmane I Eastman
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Constraint is associated with earlier circadian phase and morningness: Confirmation of relationships between personality and circadian phase using a constant routine protocol.

Authors:  B Bullock; G Murray; J L Anderson; T Cooper-O'Neill; J J Gooley; S W Cain; S W Lockley
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2016-07-31

4.  Assessment of chronotype in four- to eleven-year-old children: reliability and validity of the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire (CCTQ).

Authors:  Helene Werner; Monique K Lebourgeois; Anja Geiger; Oskar G Jenni
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Alterations of the cortisol quiescent period after experimental night work with enforced adaptation by bright light and its relation to morningness.

Authors:  Barbara Griefahn; Sibylle Robens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Sex differences in phase angle of entrainment and melatonin amplitude in humans.

Authors:  Sean W Cain; Christopher F Dennison; Jamie M Zeitzer; Aaron M Guzik; Sat Bir S Khalsa; Nayantara Santhi; Martin W Schoen; Charles A Czeisler; Jeanne F Duffy
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.182

7.  Circadian and Homeostatic Regulation of Human Sleep and Cognitive Performance and Its Modulation by PERIOD3.

Authors:  Derk-Jan Dijk; Simon N Archer
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2009-06-09

8.  Diurnal and circadian variation of sleep and alertness in men vs. naturally cycling women.

Authors:  Diane B Boivin; Ari Shechter; Philippe Boudreau; Esmot Ara Begum; Ng Mien Kwong Ng Ying-Kin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Reliability and validity of the Korean version of Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire in adults aged 20-39 years.

Authors:  Jung Hie Lee; Seong Jae Kim; Se Yong Lee; Kwang Ho Jang; In Soo Kim; Jeanne F Duffy
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Consequences of the timing of menarche on female adolescent sleep phase preference.

Authors:  Sylvia Frey; Silvia Balu; Sarah Greusing; Nicolas Rothen; Christian Cajochen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.