Literature DB >> 34050790

Phase fMRI defines brain resting-state functional hubs within central and posterior regions.

Zikuan Chen1, Ebenezer Daniel2, Bihong T Chen2.   

Abstract

From a brain functional connectivity (FC) matrix, we can identify the hub nodes by a new method of eigencentrality mapping, which not only counts for one node's centrality but also all other nodes' centrality values through correlation connections in an eigenvector of the FC matrix. For the resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data (complex-valued EPI images in nature), both magnitude and phase images are useful for brain FC analysis. We herein report on brain functional hubness analysis by constructing the FC matrix from phase fMRI data and identifying the hub nodes by eigencentrality mapping. In our study, we collected a cohort of 160 complex-valued fMRI dataset (consisting of magnitude and phase in pairs), and performed independent component analysis (ICA), FC matrix calculation (in size of 50 × 50) and FC matrix eigen decomposition; thereby obtained the 50-node eigencentrality values in the eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue. We also compared the hub structures inferred from FC matrices under different thresholding. Alternatively, we obtained the geometric hubs among p value the 50 nodes involved in the FC matrix through the use of harmonic centrality metric. Our results showed that phase fMRI data analysis defines the resting-state brain functional hubs primarily in the central region (subcortex) and the posterior region (parieto-occipital lobes and cerebella). The brain central hubness was supported by the geometric central hubness, which, however, is distinct from the magnitude-inferred hubness in brain superior region (frontal and parietal lobes). Our findings pose a new understanding of (or a debate over) brain functional connectivity architecture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain functional connectivity (FC); Eigencentrality; Hubness; Independent component analysis (ICA); Network graph; Phase fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34050790     DOI: 10.1007/s00429-021-02301-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Struct Funct        ISSN: 1863-2653            Impact factor:   3.270


  51 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms.

Authors:  V D Calhoun; T Adali; G D Pearlson; J J Pekar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis.

Authors:  Christian F Beckmann; Marilena DeLuca; Joseph T Devlin; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Subcortical contributions to large-scale network communication.

Authors:  Peter T Bell; James M Shine
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Investigation of BOLD fMRI resonance frequency shifts and quantitative susceptibility changes at 7 T.

Authors:  Marta Bianciardi; Peter van Gelderen; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state.

Authors:  Elena A Allen; Eswar Damaraju; Sergey M Plis; Erik B Erhardt; Tom Eichele; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Multisubject independent component analysis of fMRI: a decade of intrinsic networks, default mode, and neurodiagnostic discovery.

Authors:  Vince D Calhoun; Tülay Adalı
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

7.  The diverse club.

Authors:  M A Bertolero; B T T Yeo; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  A mechanistic model of connector hubs, modularity and cognition.

Authors:  Maxwell A Bertolero; B T Thomas Yeo; Danielle S Bassett; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-09-03

Review 9.  Ten Key Observations on the Analysis of Resting-state Functional MR Imaging Data Using Independent Component Analysis.

Authors:  Vince D Calhoun; Nina de Lacy
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Functional quantitative susceptibility mapping (fQSM).

Authors:  Dávid Z Balla; Rosa M Sanchez-Panchuelo; Samuel J Wharton; Gisela E Hagberg; Klaus Scheffler; Susan T Francis; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.