Literature DB >> 24945672

Functional quantitative susceptibility mapping (fQSM).

Dávid Z Balla1, Rosa M Sanchez-Panchuelo2, Samuel J Wharton2, Gisela E Hagberg3, Klaus Scheffler3, Susan T Francis2, Richard Bowtell2.   

Abstract

Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a powerful technique, typically based on the statistical analysis of the magnitude component of the complex time-series. Here, we additionally interrogated the phase data of the fMRI time-series and used quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in order to investigate the potential of functional QSM (fQSM) relative to standard magnitude BOLD fMRI. High spatial resolution data (1mm isotropic) were acquired every 3 seconds using zoomed multi-slice gradient-echo EPI collected at 7 T in single orientation (SO) and multiple orientation (MO) experiments, the latter involving 4 repetitions with the subject's head rotated relative to B0. Statistical parametric maps (SPM) were reconstructed for magnitude, phase and QSM time-series and each was subjected to detailed analysis. Several fQSM pipelines were evaluated and compared based on the relative number of voxels that were coincidentally found to be significant in QSM and magnitude SPMs (common voxels). We found that sensitivity and spatial reliability of fQSM relative to the magnitude data depended strongly on the arbitrary significance threshold defining "activated" voxels in SPMs, and on the efficiency of spatio-temporal filtering of the phase time-series. Sensitivity and spatial reliability depended slightly on whether MO or SO fQSM was performed and on the QSM calculation approach used for SO data. Our results present the potential of fQSM as a quantitative method of mapping BOLD changes. We also critically discuss the technical challenges and issues linked to this intriguing new technique.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional QSM; MR phase imaging; Quantitative BOLD; Specific brain activation; Susceptibility mapping; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24945672     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  21 in total

1.  Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range.

Authors:  Hongjiang Wei; Russell Dibb; Yan Zhou; Yawen Sun; Jianrong Xu; Nian Wang; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Susceptibility-based time-resolved whole-organ and regional tissue oximetry.

Authors:  Felix W Wehrli; Audrey P Fan; Zachary B Rodgers; Erin K Englund; Michael C Langham
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Nonlinear dipole inversion (NDI) enables robust quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM).

Authors:  Daniel Polak; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Jaeyeon Yoon; Siddharth Srinivasan Iyer; Carlos Milovic; Jongho Lee; Peter Bachert; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Kawin Setsompop; Berkin Bilgic
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 4.  Introduction to Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping and Susceptibility Weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Pascal P R Ruetten; Jonathan H Gillard; Martin J Graves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain.

Authors:  Chunlei Liu; Wei Li; Karen A Tong; Kristen W Yeom; Samuel Kuzminski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Saifeng Liu; Sagar Buch; Yongsheng Chen; Hyun-Seok Choi; Yongming Dai; Charbel Habib; Jiani Hu; Joon-Yong Jung; Yu Luo; David Utriainen; Meiyun Wang; Dongmei Wu; Shuang Xia; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 7.  Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy outside the central nervous system.

Authors:  Russell Dibb; Luke Xie; Hongjiang Wei; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 8.  Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal.

Authors:  César Caballero-Gaudes; Richard C Reynolds
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Multivariate MR biomarkers better predict cognitive dysfunction in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Alexandra Badea; Natalie A Delpratt; R J Anderson; Russell Dibb; Yi Qi; Hongjiang Wei; Chunlei Liu; William C Wetsel; Brian B Avants; Carol Colton
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Phase fMRI defines brain resting-state functional hubs within central and posterior regions.

Authors:  Zikuan Chen; Ebenezer Daniel; Bihong T Chen
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.