Literature DB >> 34050232

Accurate detection and quantification of seasonal abundance of American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) using ddPCR eDNA assays.

Teun Everts1, David Halfmaerten2, Sabrina Neyrinck2, Nico De Regge2, Hans Jacquemyn3, Rein Brys4.   

Abstract

The invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) imperils freshwater biodiversity worldwide. Effective management hinges on early detection of incipient invasions and subsequent rapid response, as established populations are extremely difficult to eradicate. Although environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods provide a highly sensitive alternative to conventional surveillance techniques, extensive testing is imperative to generate reliable output. Here, we tested and compared the performance of two primer/probe assays to detect and quantify the abundance of bullfrogs in Western Europe in silico and in situ using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Although both assays proved to be equally target-specific and sensitive, one outperformed the other in ddPCR detection resolution (i.e., distinguishing groups of target-positive and target-negative droplets), and hence was selected for further analyses. Mesocosm experiments revealed that tadpole abundance and biomass explained 99% of the variation in eDNA concentration. Because per individual eDNA emission rates did not differ significantly among tadpoles and juveniles, and adults mostly reside out of the water, eDNA concentration can be used as an approximation of local bullfrog abundance in natural populations. Seasonal eDNA patterns in three colonized ponds showed parallel fluctuations in bullfrog eDNA concentration. An increase in eDNA concentration was detected in spring, followed by a strong peak coinciding with the breeding season (August, September or October), and continuously low eDNA concentrations during winter. With this study, we report the validation process required for appropriately implementing eDNA barcoding analyses in lentic systems. We demonstrate that this technique can serve as a solid and reliable tool to detect the early stages of bullfrog invasions and to quantify temporal changes in abundance that will be useful in coordinating large-scale bullfrog eradication programs and evaluating their efficiency.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34050232     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90771-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  28 in total

Review 1.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.

Authors:  O E Sala; F S Chapin; J J Armesto; E Berlow; J Bloomfield; R Dirzo; E Huber-Sanwald; L F Huenneke; R B Jackson; A Kinzig; R Leemans; D M Lodge; H A Mooney; M Oesterheld; N L Poff; M T Sykes; B H Walker; M Walker; D H Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions.

Authors:  Miguel Clavero; Emili García-Berthou
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  DNA barcoding for ecologists.

Authors:  Alice Valentini; François Pompanon; Pierre Taberlet
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring.

Authors:  Kristine Bohmann; Alice Evans; M Thomas P Gilbert; Gary R Carvalho; Simon Creer; Michael Knapp; Douglas W Yu; Mark de Bruyn
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Are Environmental DNA Methods Ready for Aquatic Invasive Species Management?

Authors:  Adam J Sepulveda; Nanette M Nelson; Christopher L Jerde; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.

Authors:  David Dudgeon; Angela H Arthington; Mark O Gessner; Zen-Ichiro Kawabata; Duncan J Knowler; Christian Lévêque; Robert J Naiman; Anne-Hélène Prieur-Richard; Doris Soto; Melanie L J Stiassny; Caroline A Sullivan
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-12

8.  Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples.

Authors:  Gentile Francesco Ficetola; Claude Miaud; François Pompanon; Pierre Taberlet
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  A framework for estimating the sensitivity of eDNA surveys.

Authors:  Elise M Furlan; Dianne Gleeson; Christopher M Hardy; Richard P Duncan
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 7.090

10.  Robust detection of rare species using environmental DNA: the importance of primer specificity.

Authors:  Taylor M Wilcox; Kevin S McKelvey; Michael K Young; Stephen F Jane; Winsor H Lowe; Andrew R Whiteley; Michael K Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.