Literature DB >> 34047635

Pathogen and Surrogate Survival in Relation to Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Freshwater Mesocosms.

Christopher A Baker1, Giselle Almeida1, Jung Ae Lee2, Kristen E Gibson1.   

Abstract

The microbial quality of agricultural water for fresh produce production is determined by the presence of the fecal indicator bacterium (FIB) Escherichia coli, despite poor correlations with pathogen presence. Additional FIB, such as enterococci, have been utilized for assessing water quality. The study objective was to determine the survival times (first time to detect zero or censored) of FIB (E. coli and enterococci), surrogates (Listeria innocua, Listeria seeligeri, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and PRD1), and pathogens (four strains each of pathogenic E. coli and Listeria monocytogenes and five Salmonella serovars) simultaneously inoculated in freshwater mesocosms exposed to diel and seasonal variations. Six separate mesocosm experiments were conducted for ≤28 days each season, with samples (sediment/water) collected each day for the first 7 days and weekly thereafter. Microorganisms survived significantly longer in sediment than in water (hazard ratio [HR] for water/sediment is 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79 to 2.71). Also, FIB E. coli survived significantly longer than FIB enterococcus (HR for enterococci/E. coli is 12.9 [95% CI, 8.18 to 20.37]) after adjusting for the sediment/water and lake/river effects. Differences in the area under the curve (calculated from log CFU or PFU over time) were used to assess pathogen and surrogate survival in relation to FIB. Despite sample type (sediment/water) and seasonal influences, survival rates of pathogenic Salmonella serovars were similar to those of FIB E. coli, and survival rates of L. monocytogenes and pathogenic E. coli were similar to those of FIB enterococci. Further investigation of microbial survival in water and sediment is needed to determine which surrogates are best suited to assess pathogen survival in agricultural water used in irrigation water for fresh produce. IMPORTANCE Contamination of fresh produce via agricultural water is well established. This research demonstrates that survival of fecal indicator bacteria, pathogenic microorganisms, and other bacterial and viral surrogates in freshwater differs by sample type (sediment/water) and season. Our work highlights potential risks associated with pathogen accumulation and survival in sediment and the possibility for resuspension and contamination of agricultural water used in fresh produce production. Specifically, a greater microbial persistence in sediments than in water over time was observed, along with differences in survival among microorganisms in relation to the fecal indicator bacteria E. coli and enterococci. Previous studies compared data among microbial groups in different environments. Conversely, fecal indicator bacteria, surrogates, and pathogenic microorganisms were assessed within the same water and sediment mesocosms in the present study during four seasons, better representing the agricultural aquatic environment. These data should be considered when agricultural microbial water quality criteria in fresh produce operations are being determined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; FIB; Listeria; Listeria monocytogenes; PRD1; Salmonella; enterococci; fecal indicator bacteria; pathogens; sediment; surrogates; survival; water

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34047635      PMCID: PMC8276815          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00558-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  35 in total

1.  Tangential-flow ultrafiltration with integrated inhibition detection for recovery of surrogates and human pathogens from large-volume source water and finished drinking water.

Authors:  Kristen E Gibson; Kellogg J Schwab
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The efficacy of zero valent iron-sand filtration on the reduction of Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes in surface water for use in irrigation.

Authors:  Claire M Marik; Brienna Anderson-Coughlin; Samantha Gartley; Shani Craighead; Rhodel Bradshaw; Prachi Kulkarni; Manan Sharma; Kalmia E Kniel
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 3.  Enterococci in the environment.

Authors:  Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Meredith B Nevers; Asja Korajkic; Zachery R Staley; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  Environmental and animal-associated enterococci.

Authors:  Christopher Staley; Gary M Dunny; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  Adv Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.086

5.  Characterizing relationships among fecal indicator bacteria, microbial source tracking markers, and associated waterborne pathogen occurrence in stream water and sediments in a mixed land use watershed.

Authors:  J Kenneth Bradshaw; Blake J Snyder; Adelumola Oladeinde; David Spidle; Mark E Berrang; Richard J Meinersmann; Brian Oakley; Roy C Sidle; Kathleen Sullivan; Marirosa Molina
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Predicting Salmonella populations from biological, chemical, and physical indicators in Florida surface waters.

Authors:  Rachel McEgan; Gabriel Mootian; Lawrence D Goodridge; Donald W Schaffner; Michelle D Danyluk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Modeling the effect of light and salinity on viable but non-culturable (VBNC) Enterococcus.

Authors:  Karina Yew-Hoong Gin; Shin Giek Goh
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand: a comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands.

Authors:  A B Boehm; J Griffith; C McGee; T A Edge; H M Solo-Gabriele; R Whitman; Y Cao; M Getrich; J A Jay; D Ferguson; K D Goodwin; C M Lee; M Madison; S B Weisberg
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Correlation between E. coli levels and the presence of foodborne pathogens in surface irrigation water: Establishment of a sampling program.

Authors:  Pilar Truchado; Natalia Hernandez; Maria I Gil; Renata Ivanek; Ana Allende
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Physicochemical Factors Influence the Abundance and Culturability of Human Enteric Pathogens and Fecal Indicator Organisms in Estuarine Water and Sediment.

Authors:  Francis Hassard; Anthony Andrews; Davey L Jones; Louise Parsons; Vera Jones; Brian A Cox; Peter Daldorph; Howard Brett; James E McDonald; Shelagh K Malham
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Investigation on Potential ESKAPE Surrogates for 222 and 254 nm Irradiation Experiments.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Gierke; Martin Hessling
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Strategy to Evaluate Changes in Bacterial Community Profiles and Bacterial Pathogen Load Reduction After Sewage Disinfection.

Authors:  Mandy Lok Yi Tang; Stanley Chun Kwan Lau
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.