Literature DB >> 34046765

Defining Polyamory: A Thematic Analysis of Lay People's Definitions.

Daniel Cardoso1,2, Patricia M Pascoal3,4,5, Francisco Hertel Maiochi4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze laypeople's definitions of polyamory and compare definitions presented by people who are not willing to engage in consensual non-monogamy (CNM) and those who are or are willing to be in a CNM relationship. This exploratory qualitative study used data collected from a convenience sample through a web survey, where people answered the question "What does polyamory mean?" We conducted thematic analysis to examine patterns in meaning and used demographic data to compare themes among groups. The final sample comprised 463 participants aged 18-66 years (M = 32.19, SD = 10.02), mostly heterosexual (60%). Of the total sample, 54% were in a monogamous relationship, followed by 21% not in a relationship, and 13% in a non-monogamous relationship. Analysis showed that people define polyamory mostly as a set of behaviors in a relationship, followed by the potential of multiple relationships or feelings for multiple people. Definitions also include emotional, sexual, and ethical aspects. People in CNM relationships are more likely to define polyamory as constituting a potential form of relating, focus more on interpersonal feelings and ethics, and include consent in their definitions than those unwilling to engage in CNM. People in CNM relationships also focus particularly on the non-central role of sex within these relationships, which might challenge assumptions about sexuality in these relationships in clinical and research settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consensual non-monogamy; Laypeople; Polyamory; Thematic analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34046765     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02002-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  9 in total

Review 1.  Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence.

Authors:  Ilan H Meyer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships.

Authors:  Terri D Conley; Ali Ziegler; Amy C Moors; Jes L Matsick; Brandon Valentine
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-11-21

3.  Has the American Public's Interest in Information Related to Relationships Beyond "The Couple" Increased Over Time?

Authors:  Amy C Moors
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2016-05-23

4.  Sexuality in Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: An Exploratory Study Using Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Ana N Santos; Patrícia M Pascoal; Luísa Barros
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2019-11-04

5.  Whose interests do lay people represent? Towards an understanding of the role of lay people as members of committees.

Authors:  C Hogg; C Williamson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Prevalence of Experiences With Consensual Nonmonogamous Relationships: Findings From Two National Samples of Single Americans.

Authors:  M L Haupert; Amanda N Gesselman; Amy C Moors; Helen E Fisher; Justin R Garcia
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2016-04-20

7.  Defining workplace bullying behaviour professional lay definitions of workplace bullying.

Authors:  Paula Saunders; Amy Huynh; Jane Goodman-Delahunty
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2007-08-09

8.  Willingness of Emerging Adults to Engage in Consensual Non-Monogamy: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Kayla M Sizemore; Spencer B Olmstead
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-10-06

9.  Sexual identity, attraction and behaviour in Britain: The implications of using different dimensions of sexual orientation to estimate the size of sexual minority populations and inform public health interventions.

Authors:  Rebecca S Geary; Clare Tanton; Bob Erens; Soazig Clifton; Philip Prah; Kaye Wellings; Kirstin R Mitchell; Jessica Datta; Kirsten Gravningen; Elizabeth Fuller; Anne M Johnson; Pam Sonnenberg; Catherine H Mercer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Introduction to the Special Section on Consensual Non-Monogamy.

Authors:  Lisa Dawn Hamilton; Carm De Santis; Ashley E Thompson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.