Literature DB >> 23175520

A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships.

Terri D Conley1, Ali Ziegler, Amy C Moors, Jes L Matsick, Brandon Valentine.   

Abstract

In this article, we critically examine the social institution of monogamy. First, we discuss the lack of an adequate and consistent definition of the construct of monogamy and consider how common monogamy is. Next, we address perceived benefits of monogamy and whether those ostensible benefits are supported by empirical evidence. We conclude that evidence for the benefits of monogamy relative to other relationship styles is currently lacking, suggesting that, for those who choose it, consensual non-monogamy may be a viable alternative to monogamy. Implications for theories of close relationships are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175520     DOI: 10.1177/1088868312467087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev        ISSN: 1532-7957


  26 in total

1.  Individual and Relationship Predictors of Couple-Level Sexual Concurrency in Heterosexual South African Couples.

Authors:  Jennifer M Belus; Donald H Baucom; Wendee M Wechsberg
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-09-24

2.  (De)Politicizing Polyamory: Social Media Comments on Media Representations of Consensual Non-Monogamies.

Authors:  Daniel Cardoso; Ana Rosa; Marisa Torres da Silva
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-11

3.  Does "Open" Rhyme with "Special"? Comparing Personality, Sexual Satisfaction, Dominance and Jealousy of Monogamous and Non-monogamous Practitioners.

Authors:  Oscar Lecuona; Mar Suero; Tobias Wingen; Sara de Rivas
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-03

4.  Are there "Better" and "Worse" Ways to be Consensually Non-Monogamous (CNM)?: CNM Types and CNM-Specific Predictors of Dyadic Adjustment.

Authors:  Terri D Conley; Jennifer L Piemonte
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-07

5.  Comparing the Self-Reported Health, Happiness, and Marital Happiness of a Multinational Sample of Consensually Non-Monogamous Adults with Those of the U.S. General Population: Additional Comparisons by Gender, Number of Sexual Partners, Frequency of Sex, and Marital Status.

Authors:  Derrell W Cox; James R Fleckenstein; Lori R Sims-Cox
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-08

6.  What Drives the Dehumanization of Consensual Non-Monogamous Partners?

Authors:  David L Rodrigues; Diniz Lopes; Aleksandra Huic
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-04

7.  Consensual Non-Monogamy Among Kink-Identified Adults: Characteristics, Relationship Experiences, and Unique Motivations for Polyamory and Open Relationships.

Authors:  Ellora Vilkin; Richard Sprott
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-14

8.  Motivations for Engaging in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships.

Authors:  Jessica Wood; Carm De Santis; Serge Desmarais; Robin Milhausen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-14

Review 9.  Social Monogamy in Nonhuman Primates: Phylogeny, Phenotype, and Physiology.

Authors:  Jeffrey A French; Jon Cavanaugh; Aaryn C Mustoe; Sarah B Carp; Stephanie L Womack
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2017-07-13

10.  Exploring Variations in North American Adults' Attitudes, Interest, Experience, and Outcomes Related to Mixed-Gender Threesomes: A Replication and Extension.

Authors:  Ashley E Thompson; Allison E Cipriano; Kimberley M Kirkeby; Delaney Wilder; Justin J Lehmiller
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.