Literature DB >> 18514784

Cone beam CT image guidance for intracranial stereotactic treatments: comparison with a frame guided set-up.

Laura Masi1, Franco Casamassima, Caterina Polli, Claudia Menichelli, Ivano Bonucci, Carlo Cavedon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An analysis is performed of the setup errors measured by a kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) patients immobilized by a thermoplastic mask and a bite-block and positioned using stereotactic coordinates. We evaluated the overall positioning precision and accuracy of the immobilizing and localizing systems. The potential of image-guided radiotherapy to replace stereotactic methods is discussed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-seven patients received brain SRT. After a frame-guided setup, before each fraction (131 fractions), a CBCT was acquired and the detected displacements corrected online. Translational and rotational errors were analyzed calculating overall mean and standard deviation. A separate analysis was performed for bite-block (in conjunction with mask) and for simple thermoplastic mask. Interobserver variability for CBCT three-dimensional registration was assessed. The residual error after correction and intrafractional motion were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean module of the three-dimensional displacement vector was 3.0 +/- 1.4 mm. Setup errors for bite block and mask were smaller (2.9 +/- 1.3 mm) than those for thermoplastic mask alone (3.2 +/- 1.5 mm), but statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.15). Interobserver variability was negligible. The maximum margin calculated for residual errors and intra fraction motion was small but not negligible (1.57 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the detected setup errors, daily image guidance is essential for the efficacy of SRT treatments when mask immobilization is used, and even when a bite-block is used in conjunction. The frame setup is still used as a starting point for the opportunity of rotational corrections. Residual margins after on-line corrections must be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514784     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

1.  Efficient and accurate stereotactic radiotherapy using flattening filter free beams and HexaPOD robotic tables.

Authors:  Morten Nielsen; Christian R Hansen; Carsten Brink; Anders S Bertelsen; Charlotte Kristiansen; Jeppesen Stefan S; Olfred Hansen
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2016

2.  Relocatable fixation systems in intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Accuracy of serial CT scans and patient acceptance in a randomized design.

Authors:  A Theelen; J Martens; G Bosmans; R Houben; J J Jager; I Rutten; P Lambin; A W Minken; B G Baumert
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases. A report of the DEGRO Working Group on Stereotactic Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Martin Kocher; Andrea Wittig; Marc Dieter Piroth; Harald Treuer; Heinrich Seegenschmiedt; Maximilian Ruge; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Hypofractionated frameless stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of 1-3 brain metastases.

Authors:  Bruno De Potter; Gert De Meerleer; Wilfried De Neve; Tom Boterberg; Bruno Speleers; Piet Ost
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Setup margins and geometric uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiation therapy in treating pituitary adenomas: the experience of Lyon Sud Hospital.

Authors:  B De Bari; I Shakir Shakir; T Chekrine; L Lestrade; V Favrel
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Semi-robotic 6 degree of freedom positioning for intracranial high precision radiotherapy; first phantom and clinical results.

Authors:  Jürgen Wilbert; Matthias Guckenberger; Bülent Polat; Otto Sauer; Michael Vogele; Michael Flentje; Reinhart A Sweeney
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  CyberKnife enhanced conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for high grade glioma in close proximity to critical structures.

Authors:  Eric Oermann; Brian T Collins; Kelly T Erickson; Xia Yu; Sue Lei; Simeng Suy; Heather N Hanscom; Joy Kim; Hyeon U Park; Andrew Eldabh; Christopher Kalhorn; Kevin McGrail; Deepa Subramaniam; Walter C Jean; Sean P Collins
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 17.388

8.  Quantifying the effects of positional uncertainties and estimating margins for Gamma-Knife® fractionated radiosurgery of large brain metastases.

Authors:  Béatrice Reiner; Peter Bownes; David L Buckley; David I Thwaites
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2017

9.  Quantifying the trigger level of the vacuum surveillance system of the Gamma-Knife eXtend™ positioning system and evaluating the potential impact on dose delivery.

Authors:  Béatrice Reiner; Peter Bownes; David L Buckley; David I Thwaites
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2016

10.  Dosimetric consequences of translational and rotational errors in frame-less image-guided radiosurgery.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Johannes Roesch; Kurt Baier; Reinhart A Sweeney; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.