Michele Allen1, April Wilhelm1, Luis Enrique Ortega2, Shannon Pergament2, Nicole Bates3, Brooke Cunningham1. 1. University of Minnesota Medical School Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Program in Health Disparities Research, Minneapolis, MN. 2. SoLaHmo Partnership for Health and Wellness/ Community University Health Care Center, Minneapolis, MN. 3. St. Paul Public Schools, Woodbury, MN.
Abstract
Objectives: To use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) adapted to a race-conscious frame to understand ways that structural racism interacts with intervention implementation and uptake within an equity-oriented trial designed to enhance student-school connectedness. Design: Secondary analysis of qualitative implementation data from Project TRUST (Training for Resiliency in Urban Students and Teachers), a hybrid effectiveness-implementation, community-based participatory intervention. Setting: Ten schools across one urban school district. Methods: We analyzed qualitative observational field notes, youth and parent researcher reflections, and semi-structured interviews with community-academic researchers and school-based partners within CFIR constructs based on framing questions using a Public Health Critical Race Praxis approach. Results: Within most CFIR constructs and sub-constructs, we identified barriers to implementation uptake not previously recognized using standard race-neutral definitions. Themes that crossed constructs included: 1) Leaders' willingness to examine Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) student and parent experiences of school discrimination and marginalization had a cascading influence on multiple factors related to implementation uptake; 2) The race/ethnicity of the principals was related to intervention engagement and intervention uptake, particularly at the extremes, but the relationship was complex; 3) External change agents from BIPOC communities facilitated intervention uptake in indirect but significant ways; 4) Highly networked implementation champions had the ability to enhance commitment to intervention uptake; however, perceptions of these individuals and the degree to which they were networked was highly racialized. Conclusions: Equity-oriented interventions should consider structural racism within the CFIR model to better understand intervention uptake.
Objectives: To use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) adapted to a race-conscious frame to understand ways that structural racism interacts with intervention implementation and uptake within an equity-oriented trial designed to enhance student-school connectedness. Design: Secondary analysis of qualitative implementation data from Project TRUST (Training for Resiliency in Urban Students and Teachers), a hybrid effectiveness-implementation, community-based participatory intervention. Setting: Ten schools across one urban school district. Methods: We analyzed qualitative observational field notes, youth and parent researcher reflections, and semi-structured interviews with community-academic researchers and school-based partners within CFIR constructs based on framing questions using a Public Health Critical Race Praxis approach. Results: Within most CFIR constructs and sub-constructs, we identified barriers to implementation uptake not previously recognized using standard race-neutral definitions. Themes that crossed constructs included: 1) Leaders' willingness to examine Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) student and parent experiences of school discrimination and marginalization had a cascading influence on multiple factors related to implementation uptake; 2) The race/ethnicity of the principals was related to intervention engagement and intervention uptake, particularly at the extremes, but the relationship was complex; 3) External change agents from BIPOC communities facilitated intervention uptake in indirect but significant ways; 4) Highly networked implementation champions had the ability to enhance commitment to intervention uptake; however, perceptions of these individuals and the degree to which they were networked was highly racialized. Conclusions: Equity-oriented interventions should consider structural racism within the CFIR model to better understand intervention uptake.
Authors: Lise M Youngblade; Christina Theokas; John Schulenberg; Laura Curry; I-Chan Huang; Maureen Novak Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jill S Cannon; Marylou Gilbert; Patricia Ebener; Patrick S Malone; Caitlin M Reardon; Joie Acosta; Matthew Chinman Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2019-11
Authors: Stephen B Thomas; Sandra Crouse Quinn; James Butler; Craig S Fryer; Mary A Garza Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2011 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Prajakta Adsul; David Chambers; Heather M Brandt; Maria E Fernandez; Shoba Ramanadhan; Essie Torres; Jennifer Leeman; Barbara Baquero; Linda Fleischer; Cam Escoffery; Karen Emmons; Montserrat Soler; April Oh; Ariella R Korn; Stephanie Wheeler; Rachel C Shelton Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2022-06-03
Authors: Ana A Baumann; Eva N Woodward; Rajinder Sonia Singh; Prajakta Adsul; Rachel C Shelton Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Rinad S Beidas; Shannon Dorsey; Cara C Lewis; Aaron R Lyon; Byron J Powell; Jonathan Purtle; Lisa Saldana; Rachel C Shelton; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Meghan B Lane-Fall Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 7.960