Literature DB >> 3404236

Enhanced specificity of prognosis in severe head injury.

S C Choi1, R K Narayan, R L Anderson, J D Ward.   

Abstract

Data from 523 patients admitted to the Medical College of Virginia with severe head injury and known 6-month outcomes were analyzed in order to determine the optimal combination of early-available prognostic factors. Twenty-one prognostic indicators noted in the emergency room at admission were used to predict outcomes into four categories: good, moderately disabled, severely disabled, or vegetative/dead. A combination of the patient's age (in years), the best motor response (graded in the usual six-point scale), and pupillary response (in both eyes) was found to be the most accurate indicator. The model correctly predicted outcome into one of the four outcome categories in 78% of cases ("specifically accurate predictions"). If predictions into an outcome category adjacent to the actual outcome were accepted, this model was accurate in 90% of cases ("grossly accurate predictions"). A set of three simple graphs based on this model can be used for rapid early estimation of probable outcome in a severely head-injured patient at admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3404236     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1988.69.3.0381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  18 in total

1.  Early prediction of outcome in severe head injury.

Authors:  R Braakman
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  The abbreviated injury scale as a predictor of outcome of severe head injury.

Authors:  A D Walder; P M Yeoman; A Turnbull
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  A Critical Review for Developing Accurate and Dynamic Predictive Models Using Machine Learning Methods in Medicine and Health Care.

Authors:  Hamdan O Alanazi; Abdul Hanan Abdullah; Kashif Naseer Qureshi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 4.  [Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury].

Authors:  C Heim; P Schoettker; D R Spahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Clinical implications of quantitative infrared pupillometry in neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  Kostas N Fountas; Eftychia Z Kapsalaki; Theofilos G Machinis; Angel N Boev; Joe S Robinson; E Christopher Troup
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Contribution of non-neurologic disturbances in acute physiology to the prediction of intensive care outcome after head injury or non-traumatic intracranial haemorrhage.

Authors:  M M Niskanen; A Kari; J A Hernesniemi; M P Vapalahti; E Iisalo; L Kaukinen; V Rauhala; E Saarela; P Nikki
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Event-related potentials--neurophysiological tools for predicting emergence and early outcome from traumatic coma.

Authors:  N M Kane; S H Curry; C A Rowlands; A R Manara; T Lewis; T Moss; B H Cummins; S R Butler
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  D F Signorini; P J Andrews; P A Jones; J M Wardlaw; J D Miller
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies.

Authors:  Kathryn E Saatman; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Ross Bullock; Andrew I R Maas; Alex Valadka; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Knowledge of Glasgow coma scale by air-rescue physicians.

Authors:  Catherine Heim; Patrick Schoettker; Nicolas Gilliard; Donat R Spahn
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.