Literature DB >> 8857436

Event-related potentials--neurophysiological tools for predicting emergence and early outcome from traumatic coma.

N M Kane1, S H Curry, C A Rowlands, A R Manara, T Lewis, T Moss, B H Cummins, S R Butler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic value of multimodal evoked potentials (EPs) and event-related (ERPs) potentials in coma (Glasgow Coma Score <8), after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal study of neurophysiological responses recorded during traumatic coma.
SETTING: Intensive Care Unit, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four comatose TBI patients (age range 1-80 years, mean 36.4).
METHODS: Neurophysiological responses were recorded from 11 scalp electrodes with earlobe reference. Conduction times were measured for brainstem auditory, flash visual and somatosensory, short-latency EPs. Peak latencies and amplitudes were determined for long-latency components of visual and auditory ERPs, generated by passive "oddball" paradigms. These neurophysiological and various clinical parameters were correlated with patient outcome using Pearson's coefficient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Three month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Highly significant (P <0.001) correlations exist between long-latency ERP components and 3-month outcome. Short-latency EPs, brainstem (wave I-V) and somatosensory conduction times also correlate significantly with the GOS (P <0.01). Of the clinical measurements, pupillary response patterns, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS) correlate significantly with outcome, as do the retrospective measures of duration of coma and post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) in survivors. Unfortunately, due to variance of long-latency responses, even in controls, absolute values cannot be relied upon as prognosticators. The presence of "mismatch negativity" predicted the return of consciousness (89.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity) and preceded changes in GCS. Its latency was the single best indicator of 90-day outcome from coma (r = -0.641).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8857436     DOI: 10.1007/bf01728329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  28 in total

1.  Electrophysiologic function in the healthy, extremely old.

Authors:  B S Oken; J A Kaye
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Somatosensory and auditory brain stem conduction after head injury: a comparison with clinical features in prediction of outcome.

Authors:  K Lindsay; A Pasaoglu; D Hirst; G Allardyce; I Kennedy; G Teasdale
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Evaluation of brain function in severe human head trauma with multimodality evoked potentials. Part 1: Evoked brain-injury potentials, methods, and analysis.

Authors:  R P Greenberg; D J Mayer; D P Becker; J D Miller
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Recommendations for intensive care unit admission and discharge criteria. Task Force on Guidelines. Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Prognosis after head injury based on early clinical examination.

Authors:  J Overgaard; O Hvid-Hansen; A M Land; K K Pedersen; S Christensen; J Haase; O Hein; W A Tweed
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prognosis after severe head injury.

Authors:  B Jennett
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1972

7.  Evoked potentials and head injury. 2. Clinical applications.

Authors:  M Rappaport; H K Hopkins; K Hall; T Belleza
Journal:  Clin Electroencephalogr       Date:  1981-10

8.  Prognosis of patients with severe head injury.

Authors:  B Jennett; G Teasdale; R Braakman; J Minderhoud; J Heiden; T Kurze
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Multimodality evoked potentials in closed head trauma.

Authors:  D C Anderson; S Bundlie; G L Rockswold
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1984-04

10.  Enhanced specificity of prognosis in severe head injury.

Authors:  S C Choi; R K Narayan; R L Anderson; J D Ward
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Recognition of affective prosody in brain-damaged patients and healthy controls: a neurophysiological study using EEG and whole-head MEG.

Authors:  Boris Kotchoubey; Jochen Kaiser; Vladimir Bostanov; Werner Lutzenberger; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography Predicts Outcome in Patients with Coma After Acute Brain Injury.

Authors:  Wendong You; Qilin Tang; Xiang Wu; Junfeng Feng; Qing Mao; Guoyi Gao; Jiyao Jiang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 4.  Neurophysiological endophenotypes of schizophrenia: the viability of selected candidate measures.

Authors:  Bruce I Turetsky; Monica E Calkins; Gregory A Light; Ann Olincy; Allen D Radant; Neal R Swerdlow
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  MMN and novelty P3 in coma and other altered states of consciousness: a review.

Authors:  Dominique Morlet; Catherine Fischer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Cognitive event-related potentials in comatose and post-comatose states.

Authors:  Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse; Steven Laureys; Fabien Perrin
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Demand and modality of directed attention modulate "pre-attentive" sensory processes in schizophrenia patients and nonpsychiatric controls.

Authors:  Anthony J Rissling; Sung-Hyouk Park; Jared W Young; Michelle B Rissling; Catherine A Sugar; Joyce Sprock; Daniel J Mathias; Marlena Pela; Richard F Sharp; David L Braff; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Preattentional and attentional cognitive deficits as targets for treating schizophrenia.

Authors:  David L Braff; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Preattentive sensory processing as indexed by the MMN and P3a brain responses is associated with cognitive and psychosocial functioning in healthy adults.

Authors:  Gregory A Light; Neal R Swerdlow; David L Braff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The relationship between preattentive sensory processing deficits and age in schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Michael Kiang; David L Braff; Joyce Sprock; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.