| Literature DB >> 34040473 |
Nipa Basak1,2, Tsering Norboo3, Mohammed S Mustak4, Kumarasamy Thangaraj1,2,5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: High altitude hypoxia is believed to be experienced at elevations of more than 2500 meters above sea level. Several studies have shed light on the biochemical aspects of high altitude acclimatization, where participants were sojourners to the high altitude from low altitude areas. However, information regarding the difference between the high altitude adapted Tibetans living at high altitude and their counterparts who reside at low altitude are lacking. To understand this, we have measured various hematological parameters in the Tibetan populations, who are residing in both high and low altitudes in India.Entities:
Keywords: Tibetans; erythropoietin; hematological parameters; high altitude; low altitude
Year: 2021 PMID: 34040473 PMCID: PMC8139737 DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S294564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Blood Med ISSN: 1179-2736
Figure 1India map showing sampled area. The distance between Samad Rakchan and Bylakuppe is ~2320 km.
Figure 2Age distribution among (A) high altitude and (B) low altitude participants.
Description of Anthropometric Parameters of the Subjects (n=168); Data is Expressed in Mean ± SD Format
| Parameter | High Altitude | Low Altitude | Test, p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.32 ± 13.70 | 67.15 ± 18.42 | Mann-Whitney test, <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.75 ± 3.67 | 25.28 ± 4.78 | Unpaired |
Figure 3Various hematological parameters of high and low altitude Tibetan males and females: (A) RBC, (B) HCT, (C) Hb, (D) MCV, (E) MCH and (F) MCHC. Blue and maroon horizontal lines represent mean ± SD. ****p <0.0001, *p = 0.01–0.05.
Description of Various Hematological Parameters in the Subjects; Data is Expressed in Mean ± SD Format
| Parameter | HA Male (n=23) | LA Male (n=46) | HA Female (n=23) | LA Female (n=43) | Test, p-value (HA Male vs LA Male); Test, p-value (HA Female vs LA Female) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (cells/µL) | 6957 ± 1788 | 6744 ± 1682 | 6743 ± 1938 | 7277 ± 1472 | Mann-Whitney test, 0.7022; Unpaired |
| RBC (106 cells/µL) | 6.21 ± 0.74 | 4.45 ± 0.49 | 5.4 ± 0.40 | 4.19 ± 0.40 | Mann-Whitney test, <0.0001; Unpaired |
| HCT (%) | 59.83 ± 6.89 | 44.57 ± 4.56 | 50.09 ± 3.6 | 42.5 ± 4.06 | Unpaired |
| MCV (fL) | 96.6 ± 8.06 | 100.5 ± 6.97 | 92.7 ± 6.17 | 101.5 ± 4.67 | Mann-Whitney test, 0.0280; Unpaired |
| MCH (pg/cell) | 32.29 ± 2.51 | 30.27 ± 3.40 | 31.07 ± 1.97 | 30.04 ± 1.92 | Mann-Whitney test, 0.0212; Mann Whitney test, 0.1347 |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 33.47 ± 1.92 | 30.07 ± 2.26 | 33.47 ± 1.99 | 29.58 ± 1.23 | Mann-Whitney test, <0.0001; Unpaired |
Description of Serum EPO and Hb in the Subjects; Data is Expressed in Mean ± SD Format
| Parameter | HA Male | LA Male | HA Female | LA Female | Test, p-value (HA Male vs LA Male); Test, p-value (HA Female vs LA Female) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPO (mIU/mL) | 13.3 ± 11.61 (n=21) | 11.32 ± 7.77 (n=42) | 13.21 ± 6.98 (n=21) | 11.31 ± 7.63 (n=42) | Mann-Whitney test, 0.4826; Mann-Whitney test, 0.1283 |
| Hb (g/dL) | 20.01 ± 1.91 (n=41) | 13.42 ± 1.75 (n=46) | 16.97 ± 1.74 (n=38) | 12.56 ± 1.19 (n=43) | Unpaired |
Description of BMI Among Participants Belonging to Three Different Age Categories; Data is Expressed in Mean ± SD Format
| Age Category | BMI | Test, p-value (HA Male vs LA Male); Test, p-value (HA Female vs LA Female) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA Male | LA Male | HA Female | LA Female | ||
| 17–40 years | 20.46 ± 2.18 (n=13) | 23.83 ± 7.25 (n=3) | 24.34 ± 3.74 (n=9) | 28.08 ± 5.35 (n=4) | Mann-Whitney test, 0.5643; Mann-Whitney test, 0.3119 |
| 41–60 years | 21.66 ± 3.01 (n=22) | 24.44 ± 5.18 (n=5) | 23.83 ± 3.78 (n=19) | 25.98 ± 3.86 (n=10) | Mann-Whitney test, 0.1413; Mann-Whitney test, 0.0915 |
| 61–80 years | 24.33 ± 4.89 (n=6) | 23.35 ± 4.50 (n=22) | 23.7 ± 4.08 (n=10) | 28.88 ± 4.24 (n=8) | Mann-Whitney test, 0.7745; Mann-Whitney test, 0.0143 |
Figure 4Hemoglobin concentration (Hb) among age-categorized participants: (A) in the age range of 17–40 years, (B) 41–60 years, (C) 61–80 years. ****p <0.0001, ***p = 0.0001–0.001, **p = 0.001–0.01. Blue and maroon horizontal lines represent mean ± SD.
Description of Hemoglobin Concentration Among Participants Belonging to Three Different Age Categories; Data is Expressed in Mean ± SD Format
| Age Category | Hemoglobin Concentration (g/dl) | Test, p-value (HA Male vs LA Male); Test, p-value (HA Female vs LA Female) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HA Male | LA Male | HA Female | LA Female | ||
| 17–40 years | 19.78 ± 1.7 (n=13) | 13.9 ± 0.49 (n=4) | 16.28 ± 1.39 (n=9) | 12.3 ± 0.44 (n=4) | Mann-Whitney test, 0.0008; Mann-Whitney test, 0.0028 |
| 41–60 years | 20.4 ± 1.87 (n=22) | 15.24 ± 1.69 (n=5) | 17.26 ± 1.90 (n=19) | 12.79 ± 1.04 (n=16) | Mann-Whitney test, <0.0001; Mann-Whitney test, <0.0001 |
| 61–80 years | 19.08 ± 2.30 (n=6) | 13.34 ± 1.59 (n=22) | 17.05 ± 1.69 (10) | 12.56 ± 1.41 (14) | Mann-Whitney test, <0.0001; Mann-Whitney test, <0.0001 |
Figure 5Distribution of serum erythropoietin (EPO) level among participants.