Literature DB >> 34038945

Low-Load Blood-Flow Restriction Exercise to Failure and Nonfailure and Myoelectric Activity: A Meta-Analysis.

Mikhail Santos Cerqueira1, Daniel Germano Maciel1, Jean Artur Mendonça Barboza1, Christoph Centner2, Maria Lira1, Rafael Pereira3, Wouber Hérickson De Brito Vieira4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short- and long-term effects of low-load resistance training with blood-flow restriction (LL-BFR) versus low- (LL-RT) or high- (HL-RT) load resistance training with free blood flow on myoelectric activity and investigate the differences between failure (exercise performed to volitional failure) and nonfailure (exercise not performed to volitional failure) protocols. DATA SOURCES: We identified sources by searching the MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro electronic databases. STUDY SELECTION: We screened the titles and abstracts of 1048 articles using our inclusion criteria. A total of 39 articles were selected for further analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently assessed the methodologic quality of each study and extracted the data. A meta-analytic approach was used to compute standardized mean differences (SMDs) ± 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses were conducted for both failure and nonfailure protocols. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search identified 39 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Regarding the short-term effects, LL-BFR increased muscle excitability compared with LL-RT during nonfailure protocols (SMD = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.34, 0.88), whereas HL-RT increased muscle excitability compared with LL-BFR during failure (SMD = -0.61; 95% CI = -1.01, -0.21) and nonfailure (SMD = -1.13; 95% CI = -1.94, -0.33) protocols. Concerning the long-term effects, LL-BFR increased muscle excitability compared with LL-RT during exercises performed to failure (SMD = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.39, 1.79).
CONCLUSIONS: Greater short-term muscle excitability levels were observed in LL-BFR than in LL-RT during nonfailure protocols. Conversely, greater muscle excitability was present during HL-RT than LL-BFR, regardless of volitional failure. Furthermore, LL-BFR performed to failure increased muscle excitability in the long term compared with LL-RT. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kaatsu training; electromyography; muscle fatigue; vascular occlusion exercise; volitional failure

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34038945      PMCID: PMC9020604          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0603.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   3.824


  71 in total

1.  Effects of low-intensity concentric and eccentric exercise combined with blood flow restriction on indices of exercise-induced muscle damage.

Authors:  Robert S Thiebaud; Tomohiro Yasuda; Jeremy P Loenneke; Takashi Abe
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2013-07-04

2.  Effects of blood flow restriction duration on muscle activation and microvascular oxygenation during low-volume isometric exercise.

Authors:  Trent E Cayot; Jakob D Lauver; Christopher R Silette; Barry W Scheuermann
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.273

3.  Blood flow restriction augments the skeletal muscle response during very low-load resistance exercise to volitional failure.

Authors:  M B Jessee; S L Buckner; K T Mattocks; S J Dankel; J G Mouser; Z W Bell; T Abe; J P Loenneke
Journal:  Physiol Int       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.090

4.  Acute skeletal muscle responses to very low-load resistance exercise with and without the application of blood flow restriction in the upper body.

Authors:  Samuel L Buckner; Matthew B Jessee; Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; J Grant Mouser; Zachary W Bell; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 2.273

5.  Can blood flow restriction augment muscle activation during high-load training?

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Samuel L Buckner; Matthew B Jessee; Kevin T Mattocks; J Grant Mouser; Brittany R Counts; Gilberto C Laurentino; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.273

6.  Practical blood flow restriction training increases acute determinants of hypertrophy without increasing indices of muscle damage.

Authors:  Jacob M Wilson; Ryan P Lowery; Jordan M Joy; Jeremy P Loenneke; Marshall A Naimo
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Effects of exercise with and without different degrees of blood flow restriction on torque and muscle activation.

Authors:  Jeremy P Loenneke; Daeyeol Kim; Christopher A Fahs; Robert S Thiebaud; Takashi Abe; Rebecca D Larson; Debra A Bemben; Michael G Bemben
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  The Effects of Blood Flow Restriction on Muscle Activation and Hypoxia in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Brian Killinger; Jakob D Lauver; Luke Donovan; John Goetschius
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 9.  Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety.

Authors:  Stephen D Patterson; Luke Hughes; Stuart Warmington; Jamie Burr; Brendan R Scott; Johnny Owens; Takashi Abe; Jakob L Nielsen; Cleiton Augusto Libardi; Gilberto Laurentino; Gabriel Rodrigues Neto; Christopher Brandner; Juan Martin-Hernandez; Jeremy Loenneke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Neuromuscular effects of dorsiflexor training with and without blood flow restriction.

Authors:  Simon Svanborg Kjeldsen; Erhard Trillingsgaard Næss-Schmidt; Gunhild Mo Hansen; Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen; Peter William Stubbs
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.