Literature DB >> 30506882

Acute skeletal muscle responses to very low-load resistance exercise with and without the application of blood flow restriction in the upper body.

Samuel L Buckner1, Matthew B Jessee2, Scott J Dankel3, Kevin T Mattocks4, J Grant Mouser5, Zachary W Bell3, Takashi Abe3, Jeremy P Loenneke3.   

Abstract

The purpose was to examine the acute skeletal muscle response to high load exercise and low-load exercise with and without different levels of applied pressure (BFR). A total of 22 participants completed the following four conditions: elbow flexion exercise to failure using a traditional high load [70% 1RM, (7000)], low load [15% 1RM,(1500)], low load with moderate BFR [15%1RM+40%BFR(1540)] or low load with greater BFR [15% 1RM+80%BFR(1580)]. Torque and muscle thickness were measured prior to, immediately post, and 15 min postexercise. Muscle electromyography (EMG) amplitude was measured throughout. Immediately following exercise, the 7000 condition had lower muscle thickness [4·2(1·0)cm] compared to the 1500 [4·4 (1·1)cm], 1540 [4·4(1·1)cm] and 1580 [4·5(1·0)cm] conditions. This continued 15 min post. Immediately following exercise, torque was lower in the 1500 [31·8 (20) Nm], 1540 [28·3(16·9) Nm, P<0·001] and 1580 [29·5 (17) Nm] conditions compared to the 7000 condition [40 (19) Nm]. Fifteen minutes post, 1500 and 1540 conditions demonstrated lower torque compared to the 7000 condition. For the last three repetitions percentage EMG was greater in the 7000 compared to the 1580 condition. Very low-load exercise (with or without BFR) appears to result in greater acute muscle swelling and greater muscular fatigue compared to high load exercise.
© 2018 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kaatsu; blood flow restriction; ischaemia; low-load; volitional failure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30506882     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  4 in total

1.  Cardiovascular and Muscular Response to NO LOAD Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction.

Authors:  Wenyuan G Zhu; Noam Yitzchaki; Tayla E Kuehne; Ryo Kataoka; Kevin T Mattocks; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Unilateral, bilateral, and alternating muscle actions elicit similar muscular responses during low load blood flow restriction exercise.

Authors:  Daphney M Stanford; Joonsun Park; Matthew B Jessee
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Low-Load Blood-Flow Restriction Exercise to Failure and Nonfailure and Myoelectric Activity: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mikhail Santos Cerqueira; Daniel Germano Maciel; Jean Artur Mendonça Barboza; Christoph Centner; Maria Lira; Rafael Pereira; Wouber Hérickson De Brito Vieira
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.824

4.  The acute muscular response following a novel form of pulsed direct current stimulation (Neubie) or traditional resistance exercise.

Authors:  Ecaterina Vasenina; Ryo Kataoka; William B Hammert; Adam H Ibrahim; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.864

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.